By
Charles C. W. Cooke
Thursday,
March 23, 2023
Those on
the American right who continue to doubt that Donald Trump will happily burn
down anything that stands between himself and his desire to lose yet another
election for the GOP would do well to note that, despite being engaged at
present in nothing more consequential than a nascent shadow primary, he has
already reached the point at which he is willing to sully the reputation of his
home state of Florida in exchange for a mess of pottage. In a wildly
misleading Truth
Social post, published this morning, Trump cast Florida as being among “the
worst in the Country” for “crime,” “Education,” “Health & Safety,”
“Education & Childcare,” “Affordability,” and “COVID-19 Deaths.” “HARDLY
GREATNESS THERE!” he concluded.
With
friends like these . . .
One
suspects that it may be futile to begin debating facts with a man who is now
prepared to venture with a straight face that Ron DeSantis was “a big Lockdown
Governor on the China Virus.” (Ah, yes, that’s what he’s
famous for!) But here goes nothing: Trump is wrong. And, worse still, not only
is Trump wrong — he knows that he’s wrong. There is a reason
that 850 people per day now elect to move to Florida — a number that, in 2021,
included a certain Donald J. Trump — and it is not that the state is an
ignorant, crime-ridden, impossibly expensive hellhole. On the contrary: Life is
pretty good here. On Truth Social, Trump claimed that Florida is in the
bottom-half of the country for education; per U.S. News and World
Report, it actually ranks
third overall
and first in
higher education.
He claimed that Florida is “among the worst in the Country and on crime
statistics”; it’s actually below the
national average in
both violent crime and property crime. He claimed that Florida is 50th in
affordability; it’s actually 31st overall and eighth for retirees. Do you notice a pattern?
Earlier
this week, I proposed that conservatives are on the cusp of an important
choice: They can
choose to elevate Donald Trump within the Republican Party, or they can choose
to advance conservatism using the Republican Party, but they cannot do both.
Trump’s attack on Florida is a solid example of what I meant. If Donald Trump
thinks that he’d be a better presidential candidate than Ron DeSantis, he of course
has every right to say so. But to pretend that the most successful
Republican-run state in the country is a toxic disaster area that is saved only
by its fortunate abundance of “Ocean & Sunshine” is something else
altogether. Naturally, if one cares solely about the cultish advancement of
Donald Trump, it doesn’t especially matter that Trump is now criticizing
precisely the sort of conservative governance that, at least in theory, he is
promising that he’ll bring to Washington, D.C. If one cares about advancing
conservative governance, however, it matters a great deal. Usually,
progressives maintain that Trump is such an unparalleled menace that he must be
kept away from social media, and from polite society more broadly. Today, those
same progressives are frantically endorsing and amplifying his denunciation of
Florida. Why, I wonder, do Trump’s acolytes believe that is?
And why
does it not bother them? Recently, Trump has taken to
insisting that
“Florida was doing GREAT long before Ron DeSanctus got there.” “Florida,” Trump
wrote this morning, “has been successful for many years, long before I put Ron
there.” Which . . . well, which doesn’t make much sense as an argument, does
it? Certainly, it is true that Florida was doing well prior to 2018. (A big
reason for this was the series of reforms that was pushed through by the one
recent governor that Trump cannot bring himself to mention: Jeb Bush.) But if
Florida really were now a state in which crime was rampant,
education was a joke, and residents couldn’t afford basic necessities, then
Trump wouldn’t describe it as “great” — let alone as “GREAT” — or concede that
it has been “successful for many years,” or suggest that “people are fleeing from New
York to Florida and other places because of high taxes and out-of-control
crime.” As a rule, Americans do not move from places with “out-of-control
crime” to places with even more out-of-control crime, just as they do not choose
to live in places with bad schools or move from cheap places to expensive
places or get out of areas with stringent lockdowns to seek out the policies of
“a big Lockdown Governor on the China Virus.” The notion is transparently,
self-servingly, brazenly stupid — and all of us know it full well.
No comments:
Post a Comment