By Ben Shapiro
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
This week, President Barack Obama doomed Israel to a
choice between unpalatable options: either striking at Iran's nuclear
facilities in its own defense and thereby internationally isolating itself, or
watching as its most ardent enemy goes nuclear. The deal, put into place with
Iran by the Obama administration, allows Iran to continue developing
nuclear-enrichment processes, encompasses virtually no real monitoring
standards and grants cash to a regime busily preparing for a second Holocaust.
Obama made the conscious decision to shove Israel into
this corner for two reasons. First, because he is an egotist determined to
divert attention from his domestic political woes. Second, because he is a
hard-core, anti-Israel fanatic who believes that Israeli power represents the
chief threat to peace in the Middle East.
The first rationale explains Obama's timing. After years
of flirting with Iran -- a flirtation dating all the way back to his presidential
campaign of 2008, during which he said he would engage in direct negotiations
with the Islamic theocracy without preconditions - Obama culminated the
burgeoning relationship with a rammed-through deal leaving Iran in control of
its own nuclear destiny. Why the sudden rush? With his poll numbers dropping
precipitously and his signature program, Obamacare, dragging down his
presidency, Obama needed a big win.
The media duly delivered this to Obama by proclaiming his
diplomatic blunder an enormous victory. Ignoring the fact that Obama tacitly
gave Iran the right to nuclear development in contravention of all United
Nations' resolutions and the best interests of the United States, The New York
Times proclaimed, "No one can seriously argue that it doesn't make the
world safer." The newspaper also called Israel's dismay at the deal
"extremist" and "theater," and even admitted that the Iran
deal acted as a "welcome change of subject" for Obama.
The Obama administration, meanwhile, rapidly erected a
series of straw men designed to make the president look like a tower of
strength rather than the appeaser he is. Secretary of State John Kerry
immediately stated that those who opposed the deal thought war should be the
"first option" -- an odd proclamation, given Israel's repeated desire
to delay action. Obama himself said that the time for "tough talk and
bluster" was over -- as though harsh sanctions backed by the threat of
force were a bluff. (Which, apparently, they were.)
Though none of this explains why Obama wanted to make a
deal in the first place. Yes, it was a convenient distraction -- but the
president of the United States can always find a way to shift the political
narrative.
The truth is that the president despises Israel and
always has. He has spent his entire adult life surrounded by Israel-haters,
from Professor Derrick Bell to Reverend Jeremiah Wright, from former Palestine
Liberation Organization spokesman Rashid Khalidi to Jimmy Carter's former
National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. His current ambassador to the
United Nations, Samantha Power, has suggested that the United States ought to
place troops on Israeli ground to protect Palestinians from those brutal Jews.
Obama's administration has repeatedly leaked Israeli
national security information in order to stop Israel from striking Iran, and
Obama himself forced Netanyahu to apologize to the government of Turkey for
stopping its flotilla, directed toward helping the terrorist group Hamas, in
the Gaza Strip. The Obama administration sees Israel building homes in its
capital city of Jerusalem as more of a threat to peace than Iran building
nukes.
Obama's political philosophy dictates that Israel is a
colonialist outpost offending the locals -- an unfortunate hangover from the
Holocaust instead of a historic Jewish dream and possession. Obama's belief
system suggests that Middle Eastern conflict springs not from religious and
cultural differences but from Jewish intransigence. So Israel must be stopped.
And if that means arming Iran, Obama is happy to do it. If he can while
simultaneously winning himself a second Nobel Peace Prize and distracting
people from his failed domestic tenure, so much the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment