By Edie Littlefield Sundby
Sunday, November 03, 2013
Everyone now is clamoring about Affordable Care Act
winners and losers. I am one of the losers.
My grievance is not political; all my energies are
directed to enjoying life and staying alive, and I have no time for politics.
For almost seven years I have fought and survived stage-4 gallbladder cancer,
with a five-year survival rate of less than 2% after diagnosis. I am a
determined fighter and extremely lucky. But this luck may have just run out: My
affordable, lifesaving medical insurance policy has been canceled effective
Dec. 31.
My choice is to get coverage through the government
health exchange and lose access to my cancer doctors, or pay much more for insurance
outside the exchange (the quotes average 40% to 50% more) for the privilege of
starting over with an unfamiliar insurance company and impaired benefits.
Countless hours searching for non-exchange plans have
uncovered nothing that compares well with my existing coverage. But the
greatest source of frustration is Covered California, the state's Affordable
Care Act health-insurance exchange and, by some reports, one of the best such
exchanges in the country. After four weeks of researching plans on the website,
talking directly to government exchange counselors, insurance companies and
medical providers, my insurance broker and I are as confused as ever. Time is
running out and we still don't have a clue how to best proceed.
Two things have been essential in my fight to survive
stage-4 cancer. The first are doctors and health teams in California and Texas:
at the medical center of the University of California, San Diego, and its
Moores Cancer Center; Stanford University's Cancer Institute; and the M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
The second element essential to my fight is a United
Healthcare PPO (preferred provider organization) health-insurance policy.
Since March 2007 United Healthcare has paid $1.2 million
to help keep me alive, and it has never once questioned any treatment or
procedure recommended by my medical team. The company pays a fair price to the
doctors and hospitals, on time, and is responsive to the emergency treatment
requirements of late-stage cancer. Its caring people in the claims office have
been readily available to talk to me and my providers.
But in January, United Healthcare sent me a letter
announcing that they were pulling out of the individual California market. The
company suggested I look to Covered California starting in October.
You would think it would be simple to find a
health-exchange plan that allows me, living in San Diego, to continue to see my
primary oncologist at Stanford University and my primary care doctors at the
University of California, San Diego. Not so. UCSD has agreed to accept only one
Covered California plan—a very restrictive Anthem EPO Plan. EPO stands for
exclusive provider organization, which means the plan has a small network of
doctors and facilities and no out-of-network coverage (as in a
preferred-provider organization plan) except for emergencies. Stanford accepts
an Anthem PPO plan but it is not available for purchase in San Diego (only
Anthem HMO and EPO plans are available in San Diego).
So if I go with a health-exchange plan, I must choose
between Stanford and UCSD. Stanford has kept me alive—but UCSD has provided
emergency and local treatment support during wretched periods of this disease,
and it is where my primary-care doctors are.
Before the Affordable Care Act, health-insurance policies
could not be sold across state lines; now policies sold on the Affordable Care
Act exchanges may not be offered across county lines.
What happened to the president's promise, "You can
keep your health plan"? Or to the promise that "You can keep your
doctor"? Thanks to the law, I have been forced to give up a world-class
health plan. The exchange would force me to give up a world-class physician.
For a cancer patient, medical coverage is a matter of
life and death. Take away people's ability to control their medical-coverage
choices and they may die. I guess that's a highly effective way to control
medical costs. Perhaps that's the point.
No comments:
Post a Comment