By Rich Galen
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Since the grand opening of Healthcare.gov - the federal
home of Obamacare - on October 1, 2013, the federal government has been able to
sign up only 26,794 people.
26,794 people is something short of what the
Administration of Barack Obama had hoped for, had sneered at Republicans for
doubting, and had assured the American public it was on target to produce.
Put another way, after spending over three years and,
according to the Washington Post, between $170 and $300 million (just for the
website), the geniuses at the Department of Health and Human Services have been
able to sign up the equivalent of the entire population of … Carbondale,
Illinois (Pop. 26,241)
If you're looking for something to compare all this with,
Amazon.com gets about 4.3 million unique visitors - per day; almost 129 million
per month.
According to NBC News, HHS has had a "goal of 7
million newly signed up by the end of March" 2014.
I think I'm doing this correctly: 7 million - 26,794 =
6,973,296.
There are 137 days from today until March 31, 2014.
Leaving out Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years; plus Martin Luther King and
Presidents' Days that leaves 132 days (Let's assume the website will, like
Amazon or eBay but not Chick-fil-A, function on Sundays).
Starting tomorrow, the Healthcare.gov website has to
average 52,828 Americans signing up each and every day.
Given that only 623 have enrolled on the healthcare.gov
website in the first 43 days, there is - as they say in those "Think
Positive" lectures - plenty of opportunity for growth.
That 26,794 number represents the number of people who
have gone through the federal site. An additional 79,000 signed up using
state-run websites, so I have somewhat overstated the "opportunity for
growth."
In Washington State, though, some 8,000 enrollees are
getting some bad news: The amount of the premiums that the state system said
they would have to pay was incorrect to the low side. Why? Because the state
system was sending the IRS "hub" monthly income figures; while the
IRS "hub" was calculating the amount of subsidies based on annual
income figures.
Sort of like that time? In 1998? That NASA had two
different groups working on a mission - Lockheed Martin and Jet Propulsion Labs
- and the Lockheed team used English units of measurement while the JPL team
used metric calculations to send guidance signals to the spacecraft?
Result? The Mars Climate Orbiter missed the whole planet.
Happens.
Another problem with Healthcare.gov not being able to
sign people up for health insurance is that the private sector is moving along
with its part of the deal with private sector efficiency.
In California, for instance 35,364 people have signed up
using the state's system. That's the good news. The bad news is that over one
million Californians have been sent cancellation notices by their insurance
company.
Those would be notices cancelling the policies that
President Obama promised Americans they could keep if they liked their plans.
How is all this playing in America? According to
RealClearPolitics.com no national poll that has been in the field this month
has President Obama's job approval above 44 percent, nor disapproval below 52
percent. Two polls - Pew and Quinnipiac - have him at 39 percent.
A chart published by Chris Cizzilla in his Washington
Post blog "The Fix" dramatically demonstrates the state Obama is in.
I know what you're saying: "Moron. Obama's not going
to run for anything again so who cares?"
Every Democrat running for election or re-election in
2014, would be the answer to that.
The mid-term election of 2010 was fought in the Arena of
the health care issue. Two years later, Mitt Romney allowed the President's
team to move the fight from that to Romney's business practices.
But in 2014 there is little doubt that what we now call
Obamacare will be on the minds of voters and reporters. Reporters love stories
about people who are being treated unfairly. A family of four making more than
the upper limit for a subsidy will, in many, many cases, be paying more in
premiums and will have a higher co-pay than they had before.
If I were advising Republicans running for office next
year - any office - I would want as many people as possible to sign up for
Obamacare and then look for young families who are paying a lot more for their
insurance and make my Democratic opponent answer for it.
If Republicans expand their majority in the U.S. House
and take over control (or come close) of the U.S. Senate, the definition of the
term "Pyrrhic Victory" will include these words: "See, also,
Obamacare."
No comments:
Post a Comment