By Mark Steyn
Friday, November 08, 2013
At a time when over 4 million people have had their
health insurance canceled, it’s good to know that some Americans can still
access prompt medical treatment, even if they don’t want it. David Eckert was
pulled over by police in Deming, N.M., for failing to come to a complete halt
at a stop sign in the Walmart parking lot. He was asked to step out of the
vehicle, and waited on the sidewalk. Officers decided that they didn’t like the
tight clench of his buttocks, a subject on which New Mexico’s constabulary is
apparently expert, and determined that it was because he had illegal drugs
secreted therein. So they arrested him, and took him to Gila Regional Medical
Center in neighboring Hidalgo County, where Mr. Eckert was forced to undergo two
abdominal X-rays, two rectal probes, three enemas, and defecate thrice in front
of medical staff and representatives of two law-enforcement agencies, before
being sedated and subjected to a colonoscopy — all procedures performed against
his will and without a valid warrant.
Alas, Mr. Eckert’s body proved to be a drug-free zone,
and so, after twelve hours of detention, he was released. If you’re wondering
where his lawyer was during all this, no attorney was present, as police had
not charged Mr. Eckert with anything, so they’re apparently free to frolic and
gambol up his rectum to their hearts’ content. Deming police chief Brandon
Gigante says his officers did everything “by the book.” That’s the problem, in
New Mexico and beyond: “the book.”
Getting into the spirit of things, Gila Regional Medical
Center subsequently sent Mr. Eckert a bill for $6,000. It appears he had one of
what the president calls those “bad apple” plans that doesn’t cover anal rape.
Doubtless, under the new regime, Obamacare navigators will be happy to take a
trip up your northwest passage free of charge. That’s what it is, by the way:
anal rape. The euphemisms with which the state dignifies the process — “cavity
search” — are distinctions that exist only in the mind of the perpetrator, not
the fellow on the receiving end. Fleet Street’s Daily Mail reports that this is
at least the second anal fishing expedition mounted by local authorities.
Timothy Young underwent a similar experience after being fingered by the same
police dog, Leo, who may not be very good at sniffing drugs but certainly has
an eye for a pert bottom. At the time of Mr. Young’s arrest, Leo’s police
license had reportedly expired a year-and-a-half earlier, but why get hung up
on technicalities?
Messrs. Eckert and Young may yet win their cases. But one
notes that the Supreme Court has dramatically circumscribed Fourth Amendment
protections against unreasonable search and seizure when it occurs at America’s
border, and post-9/11 the “border” has been redefined to mean anywhere within
100 miles of the actual frontier. Many European countries are not 100 miles
wide in their entirety. A hundred-mile buffer zone from Belgium’s northern
border, for example, would be well south of the southern border and deep into
France. But Deming falls within the 100-mile Fourth Amendment–free zone, and
so, I note, between the seacoast and the Quebec border, does the whole of my
own state of New Hampshire. It would be prudent perhaps for Granite Staters to
affect a loose-buttocked saunter when strolling around the White Mountains.
Of course, even with millions of canceled health-care
policies freeing up medical staff, it is unlikely that the authorities could
ever give the full Deming PD treatment to the bulk of the populace. Perhaps
that’s why Americans do not seem to get terribly exercised by these cases.
There are over 300 million people, and the chances of Leo taking a fancy to
one’s own posterior are relatively remote. Yet tyranny is always capricious,
and the willingness of police and compliant doctors and nurses to go along with
it ought to disturb a supposedly free people, no matter how comparatively rare
it may seem.
Meanwhile, an unarmed woman was gunned down on the
streets of Washington for no apparent crime other than driving too near
Barackingham Palace and thereby posing a threat to national security. As
disturbing as Miriam Carey’s bullet-riddled body and vehicle were, the public
indifference to it is even worse. Ms. Carey does not appear to be guilty of any
act other than a panic attack when the heavy-handed and heavier-armed palace
guard began yelling at her. Much of what was reported in the hours after her
death seems dubious: We are told Ms. Carey was “mentally ill,” although she had
no medications in her vehicle and those at her home back in Connecticut are
sufficiently routine as to put millions of other Americans in the category of
legitimate target. We are assured that she suffered from post-partum
depression, as if the inability to distinguish between a depressed mom and a
suicide bomber testifies to the officers’ professionalism. Under D.C. police
rules, cops are not permitted to fire on a moving vehicle, because of the risk
to pedestrians and other drivers. But the Secret Service and the Capitol Police
enjoy no such restraints, so the car doors are full of bullet holes. The final
moments of the encounter remain a mystery, but police were supposedly able to
extract Ms. Carey’s baby from the back of a two-door vehicle before dispatching
the defenseless mother to meet her maker.
Did I mention she was African American? When a black teen
dies in a late-night one-on-one encounter with a fellow citizen on the streets
of Sanford, Fla., it’s the biggest thing since Selma. But when a defenseless
black woman is gunned down by a posse of robocops in broad daylight on the
streets of the capital, the Reverend Jackson and the Reverend Sharpton and all
the other bouffed and pampered grievance-mongers are apparently cool with it.
This isn’t very difficult. When you need large numbers of
supposedly highly trained elite officers to kill an unarmed woman with a baby,
you’re doing it wrong. In perhaps the most repugnant reaction to Ms. Carey’s
death, the United States Congress expressed their “gratitude” to the officers
who killed her and gave them a standing ovation. Back in the Eighties, the
Queen woke up to find a confused young man at the end of her bed. She talked to
him calmly until help arrived and he was led away. A few years later, Her
Majesty’s Canadian prime minister, Jean Chrétien, was confronted by an
aggrieved protester. As is his wont, he dealt with it somewhat more forcefully
than his sovereign, throttling the guy, forcing him to the ground, and breaking
his tooth, until the Mounties arrived to rescue the assailant from the prime
minister. But, had the London and Ottawa intruders been gunned down by SWAT
teams, I cannot imagine for a moment either the British or Canadian parliament
rising to applaud such an outcome. This was a repulsive act by Congress.
Miriam Carey is already forgotten, and the lawyer her
family hired has now, conveniently, been jailed for a bad debt. I am not one
for cheap historical analogies: My mother spent four of her childhood years
under Nazi occupation, and it is insulting to her and millions of others who
know the real thing to bandy overheated comparisons. But there is a despotic
trend in American government. Too many of our rulers and their enforcers
reflexively see the citizenry primarily as a threat. Which is why the tautness
of one’s buns is now probable cause, and why in Congress the so-called people’s
representatives’ first instinct is to stand and cheer the death of a
defenseless woman.
No comments:
Post a Comment