By Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
A friend recently sent me a link to an inspiring video
about an upbeat young black man who was born without arms. It showed him going
to work -- unlike the record number of people living on government payments for
"disabilities" that are far less serious, if not fictitious.
How is this young man getting to work? He gets into his
car and drives there -- using controls set up so that he can operate the car
with his feet.
What kind of work does he do, and how does he do it? He
is involved in the design of racing cars. He sits at his computer, looking at
the screen, with the keyboard on the floor, where he uses his toes as others
use their fingers.
His story recalls the story of Helen Keller, who went to
an elite college and on to a career, despite being both deaf and blind. Her
story was celebrated in books, in television documentaries and in an inspiring
movie, "The Miracle Worker."
But our culture has changed so much over the years that
the young man with no arms is unlikely to get comparable publicity. Helen
Keller's achievement was seen as an inspiration for others, but this young
man's achievement is more like a threat to the prevailing ideology of our
times.
The vision on which the all-encompassing and
all-controlling welfare state was built is a vision of widespread helplessness,
requiring ever more expanding big government. Our "compassionate"
statists would probably have wanted to take this young man without arms, early
on, and put him in some government institution.
But to celebrate him in the mainstream media today would
undermine a whole ideological vision of the world -- and of the vast government
bureaucracies built on that vision. It might even cause people to think twice
about giving money to able-bodied men who are standing on street corners,
begging.
The last thing the political left needs, or can even
afford, are self-reliant individuals. If such people became the norm, that
would destroy not only the agenda and the careers of those on the left, but
even their flattering image of themselves as saviors of the less fortunate.
Victimhood is where it's at. If there are not enough real
victims, then fictitious victims must be created -- as with the claim that
there is "a war on women." Why anyone would have an incentive or a
motivation to create a war on women in the first place is just one of the
questions that should be asked of those who promote this political slogan,
obviously designed for the gullible.
The real war -- which is being waged in our schools, in
the media and among the intelligentsia -- is the war on achievement. When
President Obama told business owners, "You didn't build that!" this
was just one passing skirmish in the war on achievement.
The very word "achievement" has been replaced
by the word "privilege" in many writings of our times. Individuals or
groups that have achieved more than others are called "privileged"
individuals or groups, who are to be resented rather than emulated.
The length to which this kind of thinking -- or lack of
thinking -- can be carried was shown in a report on various ethnic groups in
Toronto. It said that people of Japanese ancestry in that city were the most
"privileged" group there, because they had the highest average
income.
What made this claim of "privilege" grotesque
was a history of anti-Japanese discrimination in Canada, climaxed by people of
Japanese ancestry being interned during World War II longer than Japanese
Americans.
If the concept of achievement threatens the prevailing
ideology, the reality of achievement despite having obstacles to overcome is a
deadly threat. That is why the achievements of Asians in general -- and of
people like the young black man with no arms -- make those on the left uneasy.
And why the achievements of people who created their own businesses have to be
undermined by the President of the United States.
What would happen if Americans in general, or blacks in
particular, started celebrating people like this armless young man, instead of
trying to make heroes out of hoodlums? Many of us would find that promising and
inspiring. But it would be a political disaster for the left -- which is why it
is not likely to happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment