By Michael Baumgartner
Saturday, November 08, 2025
Long before I became a member of Congress, I frequently
traveled to and advised international mining companies in Venezuela. I saw the
country’s potential: blessed with the world’s largest oil reserves, talent, and
the rule-of-law foundations to turn natural wealth into broad prosperity.
I saw how socialist thugs Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro
brutalized its people and impoverished a nation that once led Latin America in
living standards. Their predatory policies now export disorder beyond
Venezuela’s borders.
We have to ask: Is Venezuela today a threat to
international peace and security — and a direct threat to the United States?
Yes, on both counts.
More than 7 million Venezuelans have fled a collapsing
economy and an abusive security state, stressing every country between the
Orinoco and our southern border. These migration routes also carry contraband,
weapons, and cash, where a new generation of gangs has flourished — most
notoriously, Tren de Aragua.
A normal country suppresses organized crime. In
Venezuela, the state is the business partner: senior officials sanctioned or
indicted abroad; intelligence services repurposed to protect rackets; ports and
papers “taxed” to move illicit oil, gold, drugs, and people. In the Orinoco
mining arc, toxic illegal mining finances armed groups and poisons rivers. This
is a system that monetizes sovereignty and sells it to America’s enemies.
Caracas is not a Hollywood “ops center” where our
adversaries plot around a shared table. It’s something more practical, and more
dangerous: a permissive hub where state power, transnational crime, and
extra-hemispheric rivals intersect. Marxist terrorists find sanctuary.
Hezbollah-linked facilitators use regional finance and trade channels. Russia
gets an arms market. China provides surveillance tech to enable the regime to
police dissent.
Maduro’s narco-governance model risks spreading across
the region to Mexico and beyond. U.S. personnel and facilities in the region
face elevated risk from regime-enabled armed groups. Maritime and air
interdiction are strained by dark-fleet oil movements and drug routes radiating
from Venezuelan territory and waters. Our financial system is exploited to
launder illicit oil, gold, and narcotics revenues.
When hostile networks enjoy access, safe passage, and
state protection in our hemisphere, American neighborhoods absorb the
downstream effects. If “direct threat” means predictable harm to American
families and government interests, the Maduro regime and its proxies qualify.
The previous administration foolishly thought it could
entice the Maduro regime to hold free elections in exchange for increased oil
production. The predictable result was funneling money into regime coffers
while the election was rigged.
It’s time to end appeasement and apply maximum pressure.
America has used force in the hemisphere many times
before. In 1989, Panamanian strongman Noriega posed an acute, localized danger:
U.S. personnel were attacked, and our canal obligations were at risk. The
trigger was clear and the remedy quick.
Venezuela’s threat is broader and more durable. It’s a
chronic, multi-vector threat — crime, migration pressure, terrorist finance,
foreign adversaries, and digital repression tools. That makes today’s problem
more consequential for peace and security than smaller, bounded crises like
Panama. Here’s a clear-eyed game plan for Congress and the president to
discipline the use of force:
·
Lead with moral clarity. The Venezuelan
people aren’t the enemy; the regime is. Opposition figures such as Nobel Peace
laureate María Corina Machado show the country’s potential.
·
Follow the money. Squeeze oil-for-cash
brokers, illicit-gold buyers, dark-fleet shippers, and shell/free-trade-zone
laundries. Treat Tren de Aragua and allies as hemispheric crime and terrorist
syndicates: Disrupt their logistics, finance, and communications.
·
Cut off foreign patrons. Russia, Cuba,
Iran, and China enable Caracas with weapons, advisers, surveillance tech, and
cover. Build a coalition to choke financing, parts, and political shelter.
·
Use the right tools. Keep lawful military
force on the table and use it with precision. Run a sustained campaign to
degrade the Caracas hub: smarter maritime interdiction, tighter sanctions,
aggressive anti–money laundering, and visa/asset bans on profiteering security
officials — backed by partners willing to share risk.
·
Stay the course. This is an endurance
fight; letting a criminalized state entrench as a hemispheric staging ground
will cost far more later.
After my time in Venezuela, I worked in counterinsurgency
in Iraq and counternarcotics in Afghanistan. The threats festering in Venezuela
risk spreading into the sort of problematic challenges America faced in both of
those countries. The difference, of course, is Venezuela is in our own backyard
and its disease risks infecting our direct neighbors.
Calling Venezuela a threat to international peace and security isn’t chest-thumping; it’s clarity. And clarity is where sound policy starts.
No comments:
Post a Comment