By Joshua S. Treviño
Thursday, July 23, 2026
‘Violence should stop in Mexico,” said
the tired old man. “Too many lives are lost. It destroys families. It thrusts
youths into a life without future. Nobody will win this war.”
Then, having spoken, Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada García, one
of the most fearsome cartel bosses in all of Mexican history, went silent to
await his sentencing. The sentence was handed down on Monday: life in prison without the
possibility of parole. As an end for a man who moved drugs and people across
America’s southern border for decades, and who was directly and indirectly
responsible for uncounted deaths and lives destroyed at the hands of his
Sinaloa Cartel, the sentence was arguably somewhat less than he deserved. But
the death penalty had been taken off the table some time ago, and Zambada
García is reported to have been spared the worst possible federal lockup in ADX
Florence, where his erstwhile Sinaloa partner Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzmán now
permanently resides.
The question is why he was granted these mercies, small
as they are. The Department of Justice knows, but — likely for good reasons —
isn’t talking. The conspiratorial hypothesizing that seems to attach to nearly
every element of Mexican civics rushes in with explanations, many of them
genuinely plausible.
One theory is that the circumstances of El Mayo’s
rendition to the United States are sufficiently radioactive that the DOJ has a
positive interest in keeping them unknown, and therefore in keeping the
prisoner from disclosing them. To be sure, the known facts of the case raise
significant questions. On July 25, 2024, a small aircraft from Mexico arrived
at the grandiosely named Doña Ana County International Jetport, a modest
airport in Santa Teresa, N.M., just across the Texas state line. On board were El
Mayo and a Chapito — one of El Chapo’s sons, in this case Joaquin “El Güero”
Guzmán Lopez. The Mexican authorities had no knowledge of the flight or the
passengers, but American authorities clearly did, as both men were arrested by
federal agents upon arrival.
The tales of the two prisoners, both eminences within the
Sinaloa Cartel, swiftly diverged. The Chapito was quickly charged — not by the
Americans, but by the Mexicans, whose Fiscalía General de la República (FGR),
their DOJ equivalent, indicted El Güero for treason. Tellingly, the Mexican authorities chose to
immediately credit at face value Zambada García’s assertion, issued through his
lawyer, that he was kidnapped by the Chapito and hustled onto the plane after
being lured to a meeting at which Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Moya was
supposed to be present. (Rocha Moya is, of course, now at the center of the
DOJ’s April 2026 indictments of Mexican senior officeholders.) The story
eventually turned out to be true — or was at least accepted by U.S. authorities
as a presentable narrative — when El Güero admitted to the kidnapping in his guilty plea last December.
El Güero was charged by the Americans, too — along with
his brother Ovidio “El Raton” Guzmán Lopez, who had been arrested and
extradited more conventionally the preceding year — for his own role in the
Sinaloa Cartel’s leadership. Yet something curious then happened in the Familia
Guzmán Lopez, come May 2025: That month, 17 Guzmán Lopez relatives voluntarily crossed from Mexico into the United States,
hauling their luggage and a reported $70,000 in cash across the San Ysidro
border crossing from Tijuana to San Diego — all under the watchful eyes of
American agents and at least one U.S.-side sniper. Again, the Mexican
authorities were kept in the dark: The story was broken by the intrepid crime
journalist Luis Chaparro and picked up in the U.S. press by the Los Angeles
Times. As for El Raton, his sentencing has been deferred to October 2026. El Güero has not yet had a
sentencing date set. So much for the Chapitos.
The ambit of Mexican governance has responded poorly to
this entire sequence of events. The abrupt removal of El Mayo and two of the
Chapitos from the Sinaloan chessboard sparked a sanguinary war of succession
that continues to wrack the erstwhile territories of that cartel. Those
territories extend not just across Sinaloa proper, but in various forms across
much of Mexico. Having long tolerated one species of violence in the reign of
its Sinaloa-cartel (probable) allies, the ruling Morena regime now blames the
Americans for incepting a different phase of killing. Mexican President Claudia
Sheinbaum has asked, pointedly, why — if the Sinaloa Cartel is a U.S.-designated Foreign Terror Organization — that same
United States is apparently making deals with some of its leadership.
Sheinbaum’s claim is a rich bit of turnabout: Having been a de facto ally of
the Sinaloans for years, the Morena hierarchy now gets to accuse the Americans
of the same.
Yet it is this probable Mexican state–cartel alliance
that leads to another theory about the small mercies extended to El Mayo. The
old cartel lord has been in the business for a very long time; he has worked
alongside infamous traffickers including El Chapo, Felix Gallardo, El Señor de
los Cielos, Beltran Leyva, and even the Colombians of the Medellin and Cali
heydays. He was venerable and senior when, in 2006, what would become Morena’s
original political core allegedly first formed its alliance with the Sinaloa
Cartel. El Mayo was not removed from that activity: His own younger brother,
Jesús Reynaldo “El Rey” Zambada García, has testified twice at trial in the
U.S. that Sinaloa provided funding to Morena that year. The Chapitos aren’t the
only ones who can be candid, for transactional purposes, with American
prosecutors. Could the comparative leniency accorded to El Mayo — who is easily
as malevolent in record and character as El Chapo — be a signal that he will
share what he knows about Mexico’s corrupted political class? His lawyer is
insisting it is not so, but to paraphrase Mandy Rice-Davies, he would say that.
The prospect clearly has Morena rattled, which is why
Sheinbaum has tried to preempt the narrative by ordering the FGR to reopen the case about El Mayo’s removal from Mexico, and
further accusing former U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ken Salazar of
having lied about the episode. Already stricken with a quiet panic over the
American indictments of the Sinaloa governor and one of the state’s federal
senators, among others, they (probably correctly) suspect it to be both a
result of the Chapito and El Mayo’s cooperation — and a harbinger of things to
come. For his part, Salazar (who as ambassador was regarded by much of the
Biden White House as far too close to Morena) has stated
that the whatever took El Mayo and El Güero to American soil was “not our
plane, not our pilot, and not our operation.”
Yet the plane is on public display in a small museum at the very same Doña Ana
County International Jetport at which the drug lords passed into the custody of
the United States, courtesy of the FBI’s El Paso field office. “Nobody will win
this war,” said El Mayo — but though crime will always be with us, there is a
side that is presently winning. Sinaloa’s cartel is decapitated and has
collapsed into civil war. Sinaloa’s political leadership is hiding and under
American indictment. The Mexican political class that has profited for so long
from cartel partnerships is wondering what’s next — and scrambling to cut deals to save itself.
The sentencing of the old jefe de narco is not an
end. It is merely part of the beginning. Known and unknown, public and secret,
there are more deals to come in the unfolding American war upon Mexico’s narco
estado.
No comments:
Post a Comment