A Socialist Takeover Is Not Imminent

By Jonah Goldberg

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

 

I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but it’s almost like the GOP is secretly promoting the Democratic Socialists of America, which is now producing a lot of the energy and excitement within the Democratic and Republican parties.

 

The DSA champions many views that exist wildly outside the mainstream of American politics, including the abolition of the police, prisons, the Pentagon, and the U.S. Senate.  

 

This is all, to borrow a term from social science, bat guano insane. Even if you think such proposals make sense on the merits—I don’t!—politically, this stuff is nuttier than a pool party at Mr. Peanut’s pad. For one, the Constitution effectively bans abolishing the Senate, even via amendment. So expending any political energy on eliminating it is like insisting 2+2 equal 5.

 

But, man, do some people eat this stuff up. Specifically, fringe left-wing political activists, young and mostly white progressives with useless college and graduate degrees, and the Republican Party. Now, the first two groups eat it up because they love it. The Republicans eat it up because they’re eager to run against it.

 

Republicans are increasingly insisting that the only way to stop a takeover by “godless communists” is to vote Republican.

 

“Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty,” President Donald Trump said during a July 3 speech at Mount Rushmore. “It is the greatest threat to our country, including World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, or even 9/11.” (I agree! Barring some time machine shenanigans, communism is a bigger threat than Pearl Harbor and many other past events).

 

“We’re fighting right now in Congress over whether we’re going to maintain our status as a constitutional republic,” House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted. “Or we’re going to trade that in, dismantle the foundations and go down this dark road of death to communism. That is the question on the ballot this fall.”

 

There’s a “bootleggers and Baptists” dynamic here. The DSA benefits from the attention, and the GOP benefits from the perception that Democrats are either too radical or too cowardly to confront the radicals in their ranks.

 

“It’s going to be a hate election,” a Republican working for Trump’s political operation told Axios earlier this month. “Voters have to hate the Dems more than they hate us. And we have material to work with.”

 

That might be right, but I’m not too worried, even if the GOP fails to weaponize the Red Menace. If you tune out the noise and simply look at the more mainstream question of socialism’s alleged rise in popularity, fears of a socialist takeover of America are absurdly overblown.

 

Polls do show, particularly among young Democrats, increased support for socialism and a rising distaste for capitalism. But this isn’t a new story. For the last couple of decades, dissatisfaction with the economic status quo has increased support for socialism. That’s because people equate the status quo with “capitalism.” As slaves to binary thinking, poll respondents think, “What’s the opposite of capitalism?” Answer: socialism.

 

A 2014 survey by the Reason Foundation found that millennials favored capitalism to socialism by a meager 10 points (52 percent to 42 percent). But when asked if they favored a “free-market economy” to a “government-managed economy,” the free market won 2-1 (64 percent to 32 percent).

 

Fast forward to 2026. A recent Echelon Insights survey found that among Democrats under 50, the favorability of “capitalism” is -31 points (it’s popular with every other group). When asked their view of a “free market economy,” support jumps 41 points to 22 (it jumps up with every other cohort as well).

 

In other words, “capitalism” means something very different than “free markets,” even to many socialists. And that’s fair enough. I wish our economy was more free market than it is. But the point is that a ton of people think “capitalism” is an adjective describing things they don’t like about the economy, not a synonym for “free markets” or “free enterprise.”  

 

Oh, yeah: Net favorability for communism is -40.

 

The same applies for socialism, which means many different things to different people.

 

Once you get beyond the labels and the quirks of polling, reality suggests that socialism is a much heavier lift. For example, according to Echelon, 74 percent of Medicare for All fans think it can be paid for solely by raising taxes on billionaires. This is a lie. Medicare for All would cost an estimated $32 trillion over 10 years. The total combined net worth of America’s billionaires is around $9 trillion. Forget taxes—you could confiscate everything the “billionaire class” owns and it wouldn’t cover a third of the cost.

 

In other words, even if the “socialists” win, they’ll lose at governing. And so will the popularity of socialism.