By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, August 16, 2024
Kamala Harris is hardly even bothering to campaign in the
conventional way against Donald Trump. And why should she? Joe Biden beat Trump
in 2020 without running a real campaign against him, either.
Trump’s three big problems as a candidate are precisely
the same qualities that mitigated the worst of what might have been a much
worse Trump presidency the last time around: He is lazy, he is stupid, and he
is childish.
I can hear you objecting: “Hey, we came here for serious
analysis, not name-calling!” But, in this case, the analysis and the
name-calling end up in the same place: finding that the most politically
relevant traits of Donald Trump are that he is lazy, stupid, and
childish.
Right now, the laziness is hurting Trump most. There is a
very good, credible political case to be made against Kamala Harris—but Trump
is too lazy to make the case. As political scholars based at UCLA run the
numbers, Harris’ record in the Senate was the second-most
left-wing of any Democrat to serve in this century. That gives Trump a lot
that he could talk about, if he could only get his mouth—and his brain—around
the words “for instance.” Instead, he just talks in half-understood
generalities, typically dishonest ones (e.g., telling Elon Musk, “She is
considered more liberal, by far, than Bernie Sanders. She’s a radical left
lunatic.”).
There isn’t any serious person or analysis that finds
Harris to be “by far” to the left of Bernie Sanders. But, even if there were,
degrees of leftness or rightness are not especially useful in prosecuting a
political case against a major-party nominee. Indictments of a candidate’s
support of particular bad policies or opposition to particular good policies,
however, really have to be answered. Harris has taken wrong—and
unpopular—positions on everything from race-based
college admissions to “Medicare
for All” to the First
Amendment. She has a pretty bad record on Trump’s hallmark issue,
immigration, but Trump and his team cannot advance the conversation past the
question of whether it said “border
czar” on her business card (in part because the candidate gets distracted
by his need to deliver disquisitions on Hannibal
Lecter). Trump could do a Buzzfeed-style listicle of Harris’ three
or five worst policy positions and hammer those home in a hundred speeches. But
he is too lazy to do the modest work involved.
Trump’s stupidity is wrapped up in his laziness. Anyone
who has heard Trump speak or read his unedited writing knows that he is not an
especially intelligent man. But his native stupidity is compounded by his
ignorance—which is to say, by the fact that he is too lazy to do his homework
and acquire the kind of grasp of the issues that would make him a more
effective candidate.
For example, it would not be very difficult to explain
how Biden-Harris spending policies have made inflation worse, making it more
expensive for Americans to buy groceries and necessitating policies that have
driven up rates on mortgages and car loans. (Never mind that Trump followed the
same policies during the COVID period—I’m not arguing that consistency,
of all things, would make him a more effective political candidate.) But he
would need to be at least superficially familiar with a little bit of
elementary economics to do that in conversation. Or willing to let someone
smarter write down some remarks for him to memorize.
But he won’t do the homework, and he may not have the raw
brainpower to simply file away enough mental notecards to get the job done.
There is a reason he wanders all over the place in his speeches—it isn’t only
arrogance and self-centeredness. He’s dumber than nine chickens. That’s why he
was an incompetent real-estate investor even though he was a successful
reality-television grotesque. He isn’t the first dumb person to find success in
the celebrity business, where stupidity seems to be an asset.
Naturally, all of this is made worse by his childishness.
Trump goes into rooms full of would-be donors and supporters and bores
them to death with tales of how the 2020 election was stolen. He is
derailing his own campaign right now by having an extended tantrum over the
Democrats’ Harris-for-Biden switcheroo, which has him blubbering that it is one
more act of unfairness in the heavy catalog of such acts he has been made to
suffer. (The poor dear.)
His penchant for using demeaning nicknames as a
substitute for political argument might be thought of as an aspect of his
laziness or his stupidity, but it is, at heart, part of his childishness. The
same childishness is what has him insisting that he doesn’t need to run a
conventional campaign, because he is a very special little boy. Never mind that
after his fluke win in 2016, he has led his party from one electoral defeat to
another—often in close succession, as when he pissed away Republicans’ chances in
Georgia in a snit after his humiliating loss to the human eggplant in
2020.
Trump’s personality defects were, perversely enough, this
country’s saving grace while he was president. He wanted to be a caudillo
but ended up being very little more than a poisonous buffoon thanks to the
laziness, stupidity, and childishness that kept him from realizing the worst of
his ambitions as president. That very well may keep him from realizing any of
his political ambitions in 2024.
I am not quite sure that I believe the maxim that
“character is destiny.” Stupidity, on the other hand …
No comments:
Post a Comment