By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, August 14, 2024
Never has the GOP been more unified, and Donald Trump
deserves all the credit. The issue
uniting pundits,
editorial
boards, virtually all
Republican
politicians,
GOP consultants, MAGA warriors, and rallygoers:
the need for Trump to lay aside personal gripes and grievances and to stick to the
issues
and attack Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz on their records.
The New York Times asked
former Georgia GOP Rep. Jack Kingston what he made of Trump attacking Harris
for inventing her black identity only recently. He replied, “I would stick to
the price of groceries.”
“All Trump has to do is talk about his positions, like he
did in 2016,” insists
columnist Ann Coulter.
“He’s more comfortable with personality-driven attacks,
rather than issue-driven attacks,” Neil Newhouse, a Republican pollster, told
the Times. “But given that Kamala’s a relative unknown, the policy- and
issue-related attacks would get more traction right now.”
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro concurs: “All he has
to do is focus the attack, to dump the war chest he’s accrued on this extremist
ticket, to stick to a simple point: You were better off in 2019 than you are in
2024.”
Even Trump campaign honcho Chris LaCivita says as much.
“At the end of the day, it’s really about demonstrating through her own words
how dangerous, how weak and failed she really is, and it’s not hard to do when
you have her doing the talking,” he told
the Washington Post.
Obviously following this advice would be better than
Trump’s current approach—race baiting, election denial, whining about Biden’s
defenestration, attacking fellow Republicans, crowd size boasts, etc.—all of
which is clearly ill-advised.
But “ill-advised” is the wrong word, because pretty much everybody
advising Trump is telling him to stop. In other words, the conventional wisdom
is well-advised, it’s just that Trump can’t or won’t follow it. This is
not a new phenomenon. Expecting Trump to “pivot” or “act presidential” has been
a political pastime for almost a decade. It’s like betting Godot will be
punctual or Lucy won’t yank the football from Charlie Brown.
But what’s interesting to me is not the tiresome
assumption that Trump can be anything other than who he is; rather it’s the
assumption that if he ran the focused campaign his boosters favor, it would
guarantee success. It would certainly improve his chances. But as a subscriber
to the view that “vibes”
have supplanted
substantive issues and personal character as the decisive factors in elections,
I’m not so sure.
Ever since Trump came down the escalator in 2015, I’ve
been asking my pro-Trump friends some variant of the question, “What can the
next Democratic president—or Democratic candidate—do that won’t make you a
hypocrite for criticizing?” There are a few defensible answers to this
question, but they miss the larger point. Trump has been inconsistent on so
many issues—abortion, socialized medicine, transgender rights, debt, deficits,
military interventions, criminal justice, etc.—that his supporters have largely
given up on the idea that he should be held to a consistent position or
principle. His personal character has been more consistent, but consistently
wretched. The people who love his schtick like politics as a reality show. And
those are the people he cares about because their adulation ratifies his own
self-regard. Trump wants to believe that his awesome personality is the only
thing that should matter, which is why he rejects the idea he needs to change.
The problem is he needs a majority.
Trump was narrowly beating Biden in the polls because the
Biden reality show had worse vibes. His physical and mental deterioration
amplified his political failings. Trump exuded strength and confidence, and
that was enough vibes-wise. At 78, by contrast with Biden, he managed to be
both the “youthful” candidate and the “change” candidate.
The switch to Harris reversed all that. The vibe shift is
real, as a stream of polling has shown. People were tired of the Biden show,
and when the alternative was a rerun of the Trump show, they settled for that.
But now a whole new series is on offer.
Trump and his enablers created the vibe petard, and now
they’re being hoisted on it.
Now that Trumpworld is on the receiving end of the
reality show politics they helped create, they want to pivot back to issues.
But what if voters, at least the ones who will decide the election, think
politics-as-vibes is the new normal, particularly as Harris helpfully walks
away from her most controversial positions? Trump has always benefited from the
fact the rules of normal politics applied to everyone but him. Perhaps he
succeeded in liberating his opponent from those rules, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment