By Dominic Pino
Thursday, August 15, 2024
Republicans sometimes get a lot of grief for being stuck
in the 1980s on policy. This is little more than trying to dismiss arguments
for being old rather than for being wrong. Obviously, a lot has changed since
the ’80s, and it’s not a matter of copy-pasting that policy agenda for today.
But at the very least, the U.S. is currently facing a rising cost of living,
the accumulation of past regulations that stifle present growth, and a
communist-dictatorship adversary plus an aggressive Iran. It just might be the
case that tax cuts, deregulation, and peace through strength are at least
reasonable policies to try in response to those circumstances.
Democrats, on the other hand, are stuck in the 4th
century. Their brilliant new policy idea, Kamala Harris’s only one so far, is
price controls. Noah Rothman writes, “This float is light on details, but the dispatch
indicated that Harris would enforce her plan to impose price stability on the
market by decree via the Federal Trade Commission, which would be empowered
along with state attorneys general ‘to investigate and levy penalties on food
companies that violate the federal ban.'”
Imposing price stability by decree was Diocletian’s idea
of good policy. The Edict on Maximum Prices was issued in 301 by the Roman
emperor. Harris promises fines for price-gougers; Diocletian promised the death
penalty for profiteers — it was a more bloody time then. Price controls go back
even further: There were price controls in the Code of Hammurabi, and
archaeologists have discovered price controls a few centuries before then, ca. 1750 b.c.
For thousands of years, politicians have used price
controls to deflect responsibility for their own failures. They don’t
work, and they create new problems. If the choice is being stuck in the ’80s
with policies that won the Cold War, ushered in 40 years of low inflation, and
have kept the U.S. a relatively low-tax country, or being stuck in the 4th
century with price controls and economic decrees, it’s a no-brainer which
policy agenda is better.
No comments:
Post a Comment