By Matthew Continetti
Saturday, August 31, 2024
It was, Dana Bash said on CNN at 9 p.m. Thursday, “a
watershed moment.” Not just a watershed — “a defining moment.” Why the fuss?
Kamala Harris was giving an interview.
Think about that. Somehow, in the whirlwind of campaign
2024, we have reached the point where it’s news that the Democratic nominee for
president of the United States of America will answer questions from the press.
Until now, if you’ve been interested in Harris’s views, you’ve had to rely,
with one or two exceptions, on the Harris whisperers — the unnamed aides quoted
in mainstream media disavowing the vice president’s previous positions on
health care, energy, the environment, immigration, and crime. The interview
mattered because it was the first time we heard the nominee unfiltered, without
her teleprompter, no notes.
Harris is elusive. It’s been over a month since she
locked up the Democratic nomination, and we barely know anything about what she
wants to do as president, or where she’d like to lead the country. One virtue
of the long campaign is that, over two years, you get a feeling for candidates.
You learn a lot — sometimes too much — about them. Democratic strategist David
Axelrod once said that presidential campaigns “are like an MRI for the soul.”
Harris missed her doctor’s appointment. She’s the first nominee in the modern
era not to have won a primary. She’s delivered one major policy speech, on
price controls, to mixed reviews. Then a Harris whisperer told the New York Times not to worry, the plan won’t
become law anyway.
“I think she’s someone who doesn’t like feeling known,
doesn’t like you assuming to have figured her out, and I think that’s true
politically and personally,” Astead Herndon of the New York Times told a colleague this week. Harris’s suspicion of reporters
was apparent in the conversation with Bash. She seemed to be spending more time
trying not to mispronounce Bash’s first name than delivering a message directly
and pithily. Forty days of preparation weren’t enough.
When Bash asked Harris if she would invite a Republican
to join her cabinet, Harris reacted as though she hadn’t contemplated such a
move. She looked downward for much of her answer, thinking through the question
aloud before settling on sure, why not, as her response. The last Republican to
serve in a Democrat’s cabinet was former defense secretary Bob Gates under
Barack Obama. It did not end well.
Harris’s values may not have changed, but what were her
values in the first place? She told Bash that the same values informed her
support for the Green New Deal in 2019 and the (so-called) Inflation Reduction
Act in 2022. But the two pieces of legislation are different in scope and
method. The Green New Deal was a child of Representative Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) and her socialist “Squad.” It aims to transform the
U.S. economy. The Inflation Reduction Act was a massive spending bill, a grab bag
of energy and health-care subsidies and an expansion of the IRS. Harris didn’t
explain the through line that connects reducing the number of “farting cows” and shoving money into EV charging stations.
Or perhaps she didn’t want to.
Bash asked some good questions, but rarely followed up.
She mentioned Harris’s calls to ban fracking. When Harris said, “As president I
will not ban fracking,” Bash moved on. The next subject was immigration. What
about the time when Harris wanted to decriminalize border crossings? “I would
enforce our laws as president going forward,” Harris said. What a relief.
In the end, Harris remained somewhat aloof, hesitant,
withdrawn. She stuck close to her talking points. The interview was cut into
segments, and the final piece was all soft — how Harris felt about the photo of
her grandniece watching her accept the Democratic nomination, how
vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota, responded to his
son’s joy at seeing his dad named as Harris’s running mate.
About Walz. Bash asked him to explain his
misrepresentation of his National Guard service, his family’s fertility
treatments, his DUI. He, too, stuck to the playbook. He emoted. He harrumphed.
He avoided a direct answer. Bash could’ve pressed him further. It was a missed
opportunity. One among many.
A watershed? A defining moment? If so, the water’s under
the bridge. And I wouldn’t say the moment defined Kamala Harris well.
No comments:
Post a Comment