By Kevin D. Williamson
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
African Americans occupy a strange social niche. They are
at once profoundly alienated from the mainstream of American society and
somewhere near to the heart of it, inasmuch as black culture is one of the
great wellsprings of American culture. Though the Main Line WASPs are still out
there in the country clubs and on the charity-ball circuit, in American popular
culture — music, television, film, sports, fashion, and such highbrow pursuits
as literature and drama — black America, currently just 12.6 percent of the
population, punches above its weight. But African Americans are profoundly
overrepresented in the prison population, in the murder-victim population, and
in the poor population, as well.
Until quite recently, I thought it was remarkable that
black Americans took such a deeply conspiratorial view of politics and public
affairs: Louis Farrakhan and his insane racial just-so stories, the wider
anti-Semitic paranoia, the familiar myths about the CIA bringing crack and HIV
to black neighborhoods for nefarious purposes. Even among African Americans who
do not buy any of those fanciful tales entirely, there is a sense that, however
wrong they may be in the details, Farrakhan et al. speak to a deeper and more
subtle truth. This can produce some perverse outcomes: Some years ago, the Philadelphia Daily News ran a cover
including the police mugshot of every fugitive currently wanted by the local
police in a homicide case. The faces were all black and brown, not because the
editors had excluded the white fugitives from the cover but because there were
none. The outcry was difficult to parse: No one really claimed that the cover
was wrong in any particular — those pictured were wanted and those wanted were
pictured — but Philadelphia’s black leaders insisted it was wrong on some
deeper and more mysterious level. The editor of the newspaper in the end agreed
and, in a baffling move, apologized for his newspaper’s entirely accurate
portrayal of a situation of great public concern.
What may be at work here is something that is difficult
to talk about: humiliation. Beyond the CIA-centered fantasies and Jew-hating
Farrakhan nonsense, you hear a lot of claims about the state of black American
life that are demonstrably untrue. It is not the case that the Ku Klux Klan or
white-power skinheads are staging murderous raids on black neighborhoods. It is
not the case that police commonly shoot unarmed black men who are simply
minding their own business. Those things are in fact exceedingly rare. But what
about the often-repeated, less dramatic accounts of petty (and not so petty)
humiliation in everyday black life: being followed around stores by clerks who
assume that black customers are likely to be thieves, questionable traffic
stops in which black drivers are subjected to invasive and discourteous
interrogation, unfriendly loan officers and apartment managers, hostesses who
look at black customers like they’ve wandered into the wrong restaurant. Is
that all made up, too?
Some of it. The different outcomes experienced by the
median white loan applicant and the median black loan applicant much more
closely track income and credit rating than race. It is implausible that the
radically different criminal-conviction rates of whites and blacks are
unrelated to differences in real crime rates. And there are rude people of all
races who are rude to people of all races: A few years ago, waiting to meet a
friend for lunch at the Harvard Club in New York (I was the guest, not the
member), I was very amused when a harried, middle-aged man on a cell phone
rushed in and handed me his car keys, having mistaken me for the valet. (I was
wearing a bow tie, in fairness.) Happily for him, the car wasn’t worth
stealing, and I silently handed the keys back to him.
But of course if all that silly talk of “privilege” means
anything at all, it means that reasonably well-off white men having lunch at
the Harvard Club or the Union League experience these situations in a
fundamentally different way than someone who hails from a community that is,
whatever his own individual circumstances, poorer, less powerful, less socially
mobile, less likely to propel him to the corner office, and more likely to
propel him to prison. Take all that as understood.
I wrote above that I thought the prominence of mass
paranoia in African American life was remarkable “until quite recently” because
— I doubt this even requires explaining — it has become such a prominent and
unwelcome feature of life where I live politically: on the Right, which is
overwhelmingly (and more and more self-consciously) white, Christian,
relatively affluent, and male-dominated. For many years working as a newspaper
editor, I published ordinary stories about workaday crime in and around
Philadelphia, and I’d routinely hear from black leaders and black readers that
media outlets such as mine “always make our
neighborhoods look bad.” Now, I hear cries of “fake news!” from the right every
time there’s a story discomfiting to the Trump administration or to Roy Moore
or to whichever right-wing populist figure is the cultural totem of the moment.
To have coordinated a fictitious case against Roy Moore on sexual-misconduct
grounds would have taken a wide-ranging conspiracy involving scores of people
unknown to one another — and Roy Moore would have been one of them. What else
could his claim not to have dated young girls “without their mothers’
permission” be taken to mean, and what else could be made of his conflicting
accounts of his encounters with those girls? (Never mind, for the moment, the
many other aspects of Moore’s résumé and his character that render him unfit
for office.) But those black leaders who assumed I was trying to make black
neighborhoods look bad rarely if ever had any particular complaint with any
particular detail of my coverage. In that, I was markedly unlike the powers
that be at CNN, who have given the “fake news!” crowd so much fodder.
What’s happened and is happening in Alabama is not about
policy. “I’d rather vote for Roy Moore, who might be a bad guy, than for a guy
I know favors abortion!” goes one
line of argument, but that’s unpersuasive. Moore’s absence from the Senate
would be unlikely to have any effect on abortion law or on which party controls
the chamber. And, given that the election today is only for the remainder of
Jeff Sessions’s unfinished Senate term, even losing the seat to a Democrat
would almost certainly represent a very short-term setback.
This, too, is at its root about humiliation. Progressives
scoff at the notion that economic insecurity drives right-wing populism, and
they point to the fact that Trump’s supporters in the Republican primary were
relatively high-income, not out-of-work blue-collar factory men. That’s a
little narrow: It is entirely possible to have fears about the economic
prospects of one’s children, one’s extended family, or one’s community
irrespective of one’s own circumstances. (At the risk of belaboring the
parallel here, wealthy African Americans are in fact slightly more supportive
of welfare programs and economic redistribution than are poor African
Americans, even though they themselves are much more likely to pay for such
programs than to benefit from them.) Progressives would prefer this be all
about racism, which makes it a simple and satisfying black-hats/white-hats
contest. The emergence of self-conscious white-interest politics is certainly a
part of what is happening, but there is more to all of those millionaires and
billionaires and alleged billionaires raging about “elites” and “elitism” than
old-fashioned Bull Connor–style racism, or newfangled Richard Spencer–style
racism, either. And if you can get past the “white genocide” stuff and the
anti-Semitic conspiracy theories (strange what unites black America and white
America), you will hear stories of humiliation rooted in a sense of growing
powerlessness: university administrators who assume that young white men are
guilty of whatever it is they happen to be accused of, a popular culture that
sneers at life outside of the coastal metros and holds in contempt the people
who prefer a different and less crowded mode of living, an economy that has
less and less use for people who cannot bring the chops of Silicon Valley or
Wall Street to an increasingly globalized world, institutions that mock and
degrade faith, family, and — especially — fathers. These voters look at the Masterpiece Cakeshop case and see only
naked kulturkampf, a plot to humiliate a well-meaning and well-intentioned
Christian carried out by culture warriors who could have found a wedding cake
anywhere but insisted that this man be brought into conformity — and they are
not entirely wrong about that.
It was not policy that brought them to Donald Trump, and
it is not policy that brought them to Roy Moore, however much they talk about
abortion or the Constitution or anything else. It is the desire to humiliate
their tormentors, from the social-justice warriors on campus to the powers that
be in politics and the media who either ignore or harass them. Their strategy
is to meet the world’s bullies with a bigger and more sadistic bully. They have
not come around to Roy Moore in spite of his many disqualifying defects but
because of them — democracy means that you can make the other side swallow
whatever you want, if you have the numbers. Whether they really have the
numbers, and whether those numbers will prove enduring, is a longer-term
consideration about which they are not very much inclined to think at the
moment. But the new wore off Trumpism pretty quickly, a fact that should
concern Republicans and conservatives.
There is a better way to go about organizing the country
than bonk-you-on-the-head tribalism, but it requires a measure of maturity and
forbearance that we do not seem to be able to muster just now. The founding
generation had Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Adams. We have Trump, Moore,
Schumer, Pelosi. If the Almighty had wanted to teach us not to put our trust in
princes, He could hardly have done any better. But this is our doing. We have this situation because we choose to have it, because
we put our faith in naked political power and therefore choose to elevate the
worst and ugliest among us. This is all on us.
No comments:
Post a Comment