By David French
Wednesday, December 06, 2017
President Trump’s decision to formally recognize that
Jerusalem is the capital of Israel and to announce plans to move America’s
embassy to the seat of Israel’s government is one of the best, most moral, and important
decisions of his young administration. On this issue, he is demonstrating
greater resolve than Republican and Democratic presidents before him, and he is
defying some of the worst people in the world.
Think I’m overstating this? Think I’m too enthusiastic
about an isolated diplomatic maneuver — especially when that maneuver, to quote
the New York Times, “isolates the
U.S.” and “has drawn a storm of criticism from Arab and European leaders”?
Let’s consider some law, history, and context.
First, sovereign nations are entitled to name their
capital, and it is the near-universal practice of other nations to locate their
embassies in that same capital. I say “near-universal” because the nations of
the world have steadfastly refused to recognize Israel’s capital. They’ve
steadfastly placed their embassies outside of Jerusalem. They do so in spite of
the Jewish people’s ancient connection to the City of David and in spite of the
fact that no conceivable peace settlement would turn over the seat of Israel’s
government to Palestinian control — even if parts of East Jerusalem are
reserved for a Palestinian capital. Israel’s government sits on Israeli land,
and it will remain Israeli land.
Yet the international community condemns America for
recognizing reality, for treating Israel the way the world treats every other
nation. Why?
From the birth of the modern nation-state of Israel, an
unholy mixture of anti-Semites and eliminationists have both sought to drive
the Jewish people into the sea and — when military measures failed — isolate
the Jewish nation diplomatically, militarily, and culturally. Working through
the U.N. and enabled by Soviet-bloc (and later) European allies, these
anti-Semites and eliminationists have waged unrelenting “lawfare” against Israel.
(Lawfare is the abuse of international law and legal processes to accomplish
military objectives that can’t be achieved on the battlefield.)
The scam works like this: The U.N. and other
international bodies establish rules that apply only to Israel, or they hold
Israel to higher standards than any other nation on earth; then, when Israel
(or its primary ally, America) object to those unjust rules and double
standards, the Arab world threatens unrest, riots, or, at worst, renewed jihad.
A cowardly European community goes along, perpetuating injustice in the name of
“stability.”
The examples are legion. Time and again the U.N. Human
Rights Council and the U.N. General Assembly dedicate more resolutions to
condemning Israel than the rest of the world’s nations combined. The world’s
Islamic countries vote in unified lockstep against Israel, in spite of the fact
that many of these countries are thousands of miles from the Middle East.
They’re often motivated by vile anti-Semitic bias, and their populations are
shot-through with bigotry. According to a
2013 Anti-Defamation League survey, a whopping 74 percent of North African
and Middle Eastern residents registered anti-Semitic beliefs. Even 61 percent
of far-away Malaysians have anti-Semitic attitudes.
The U.N., moreover, adjusted
its definition of refugees for the special and sole benefit of
Palestinians. Contrary to conventional international law, the U.N. treats the descendants of Palestinian war refugees
as refugees themselves. Thus, incredibly, the population of Palestinian
“refugees” from the 1948 and 1967 conflicts is growing. The result is a perpetual, unique, and artificial crisis,
one that is designed specifically to place pressure on one nation on planet
Earth: Israel.
When it comes to the scrutiny placed on the Israeli
military, one hardly knows where to begin. The IDF takes greater care than any
other actively engaged military in the world (including the U.S.) to avoid
civilian casualties. Its routine conduct of military operations goes above and
beyond the requirements of the law of armed conflict. By contrast, Israel’s
terrorist opponents violate the law of armed conflict not just as a matter of
course but as a matter of strategy. They target civilians on purpose. They use
human shields. They hide weapons in civilian locations like mosques and
hospitals. Yet when armed conflict breaks out, the anti-Semitic legions cheer
Hamas and condemn the IDF.
The bottom line is that to be Israeli in the world is to
face unique challenges. In international competitions, athletes will sometimes
forfeit rather than compete against Israelis. Universities will impose
sanctions on Israeli academics that they’ll impose on no one else. You’ll find
yourself barred from entering numerous countries. And when defenders of these
double standards bleat about “Israeli occupation,” remember that they don’t
impose the same penalties on nations with far worse records on human rights.
That, friends, is textbook anti-Semitism.
If “stability” means the perpetuation of double
standards, the isolation of Israel, and continued kowtowing to threats of
violence, then it’s time to call the Arabs’ bluff. If the most powerful nation
in the history of the world doesn’t have the moral strength to even properly
recognize Israel’s capital, it gives aid and comfort to those who impose unique
burdens on the Jewish state. Will America’s Arab allies — nations that depend
on our alliances to confront a growing Iranian threat — forsake their own
national security to protest an embassy location? It’s time to find out.
The Trump administration has made the right move. Now
let’s see how the bigots respond.
No comments:
Post a Comment