By Kevin D. Williamson
Thursday, December 21, 2017
Republicans have had their spoonful of sugar. Time for
the medicine.
Taking the ever-popular dessert-first approach to fiscal
policy, Republicans have delivered a very large tax cut. It has some good
features: It lowers the U.S. statutory corporate-tax rate, formerly one of the
highest in the world, to 21 percent, more in keeping with other advanced
economies; it expands the standard deduction; it raises the threshold for the
estate tax, which will be of great interest to those of you with parents worth
more than the previous limit of $11.2 million; it caps, though it fails to
eliminate, the deduction for state and local taxes, which is both good policy
and SALT in the wounds of Democrats from high-tax states such as California and
New Jersey.
It will also add about $1.5 trillion to the national
debt.
The Republicans are trying their best to ignore that.
They claim, contrary to historical evidence and the views of most professional
economists, that these tax cuts will pay for themselves. This is the right-wing
version of the magical Keynesian stimulus multiplier — a free-lunch fantasy
that we can pay for our bloated and expensive federal government by cutting
taxes.
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has said that Republicans
have every intention of making permanent the individual tax cuts, which
currently are scheduled to expire in ten years. The Republicans had to make
those “temporary” on paper in order to comply with budget rules. Which is to
say, the speaker has acknowledged that the accounting shenanigans used to get
this bill passed in the teeth of statutory spending constraints are basically
bullsh**. But there’s a lot of bullsh** going around Washington just now.
I am reminded of two pieces of ancient history here. One
is that the main problem with the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Balanced Budget Act,
passed a generation ago, was that it worked; Congress gutted it as soon as it
started preventing congressmen from doing what they like to do best, which is
spend money like rappers with 24 hours to live. The second is that heroin once
was used as a treatment for morphine addiction. If the connection between those
two pieces of trivia eludes you, then you haven’t seen the junkies in
Washington when they’re desperate for a fix. When sequestration was really
going, there were tough-guy military contractors in Virginia wailing like children
who’d been told that they cannot have dessert.
Time to eat your spinach, Washington.
The United States is on an unsustainable fiscal
trajectory. That does not mean that there is an economic crisis right around
the corner, today, tomorrow, or in six months. But if nothing is done,
entitlement spending will grow beyond our ability to pay for it, even with
substantial future tax increases. Military spending is a heavy contributor to
our fiscal burden, too, and it could and should be reduced, but that will first
require rethinking our national-security posture and our worldwide military
capabilities. For the military, the mission determines the budget, but much of
federal spending would be more properly organized the other way around. And as
much fun as it is to mock Harry Reid’s federally subsidized cowboy-poetry
festivals and the critical national effort to get monkeys high on cocaine,
basically all of federal spending goes to a handful of programs: Social
Security, Medicare, Medicaid, national defense, and interest on the debt.
Everything else — from the federal highways to staffing the embassies to the
FBI — adds up to about 20 cents on the federal spending dollar. If interest
rates go up, then debt service could become a radically larger expense — think
about an outlay roughly the size of the Department of Defense budget — very
quickly.
Which is to say, there’s no way to fix our finances
without doing the things that nobody — especially Republicans — wants to do,
meaning some combination of cuts to military spending, reform of Social
Security and Medicare, and tax increases. The less you want of one, the more
you’re going to need of the others.
The Growth Fairy is not going to save us. There’s a lot
of loose talk just now about sustained economic growth of 4 percent or more.
This is unlikely to come to pass. If I am wrong about that, nobody will be
better pleased than I. My friend Larry Kudlow is one of the great tax-cut
optimists, and if we see real GDP growth of 4 percent or more for four quarters
running after these tax cuts are implemented, I’ll shine his shoes.
Here’s a thought experiment for you. Imagine you have a
ne’er-do-well cousin who never saves a penny for his retirement. You advise him
that he needs to save, to be responsible for himself, and he says: “I’ve got it
covered. I’m going to win the lottery.” You see him when he’s 30 years old, and
he’s planning to win the lottery. You see him at 40 and 50 and 60, and he’s
still never saved a penny, but still buying those Powerball tickets every week.
And then, at 65, the dumb son-of-a-bitch wins the lottery, and takes home $300
million. Question: Was counting on winning the lottery a good retirement plan?
Of course not. Idiots get lucky from time to time, and
Bismarck is supposed to have remarked that there exists a special Providence
for fools, drunks, and the United States of America. But we should not tempt
Providence. It’s time to get sober.
No comments:
Post a Comment