By Kevin D. Williamson
Sunday, December 10, 2017
‘He didn’t win, did he?”
Some of you will remember that sentence. Harry Reid, then
the Democratic leader in the Senate, in 2012 retailed a series of wild,
baseless, outright lies about Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee,
claiming, among other things, that he had paid no taxes in recent years in
spite of his substantial wealth. Because this was coming from a major figure in
the Democratic party and not some yahoo on Daily
Kos, the claim was widely reported and discussed, and it fit in nicely with
the Democratic strategy of characterizing Romney as an out-of-touch plutocrat
who as a private-equity investor would have sold his mother — or more likely
your mother — to make a buck.
Of course is was bulls**t. And most everybody knew it
was: Harry Reid, before being sent into retirement and richly deserved
obscurity, was one of the most dishonest, despicable, lying, conniving,
disreputable, contemptible lowlifes ever to disgrace the United States
Congress. When Reid was later confronted by CNN’s Dana Bash with the facts of the
case and asked about his willful mischaracterization of the facts, Reid
responded: “He didn’t win, did he?”
And that was that.
In the course of attempting to salve their consciences on
the matter of Donald J. Trump, more than a few Republicans have adopted the
Harry Reid standard: It doesn’t matter what’s been said or done, so long as the
right guy wins in the end — meaning the guy with the “R” next to his name,
irrespective of what it is he actually believes or what manner of man he is.
Republican self-abasement in the pursuit of power is terrible to behold: I like
and admire Senator Ted Cruz, who possesses one of the best conservative minds
in politics and who currently is prostrating himself before a man who insulted
his wife, called him a liar, and suggested that his father was mixed up in the
assassination of President Kennedy. Why? Because Trump won and Cruz did not,
and because Senator Cruz apparently has the natural politicians’ ability to
flow with the go — to get in front of the parade — without feeling too keenly
the pang of honor.
Similarly, Republicans are at the moment lining up behind
or at least making their peace with Roy Moore, the disgraced and disgraceful
Alabama jurist who takes his dates the way he takes his Scotch: 14 years old
and on the rocks. (Picking up underage girls is one thing, but at a custody hearing? That’s some next-level
degeneracy.) Again, Senator Cruz found a way to get some of that stink on
himself, comically trying to explain why he believed that Al Franken should be
driven from the Senate while the question of Roy Moore should be the exclusive
province of the people of Alabama. The ensuing ridicule was not entirely
undeserved.
The current polls suggest Moore is winning.
“You establishment lackeys would rather lose with dignity
than do what it takes to win!” the familiar criticism goes. Politics ain’t
beanbag, etc. Mitt Romney didn’t win, did he? Somewhere in Henderson, Nev.,
Harry Reid is snickering.
Karl Marx and Joseph Stalin, too. “The philosophers have
only interpreted the world, in various ways,” Marx said, highlighting the
inevitable rift between the intellectuals and the bomb-throwers. “The point,
however, is to change it.” The Western world was at one point quite full of
apologists for the purges and brutalities of Joseph Stalin, with our Communists
and fellow-travelers — just “liberals in a hurry,” they said they were —
justifying what ended up being 100 million deaths as the brush-clearing
necessary before laying the foundations of utopia. The inevitable cliché,
“You’ve got to break a few eggs to make an omelet,” was answered with
characteristic economy by George Orwell: “Where’s the omelet?”
Republicans ought to be asking themselves the same
question.
My friend (and boss) Rich Lowry recently argued that the
Trump administration has proved so far surprisingly successful from the point
of view of conventional Republican priorities — there’s more to the Trump
record, he said, than Neil Gorsuch. And that’s true enough: Scott Pruitt at the
EPA has done useful and important things, as has Betsy DeVos at Education. But
that’s a side of hash browns, not an omelet. Health care remains unreformed,
the tax bill is an incoherent mess, the border remains unsecured, there has
been no significant reform of economic policy, and we have in fact moved in the
direction opposite from fiscal sanity, etc. President Trump announced that the
U.S. embassy in Israel would be moved to Jerusalem . . . and then immediately
signed a waiver, as he predecessors had, adding an Augustinian “but not yet” to
the end of his declaration. That was a classic Trump move: The Trump
administration is a show about nothing.
That’s not a bargain at any price. But at the price of
one’s honor? The Republican party took the lead in seeing off both American
slavery and worldwide Communism under the leadership of men including Abraham
Lincoln, Dwight Eisenhower, and Ronald Reagan. The most today’s Republican
party can say for itself is: “You can’t prove
our guy was a serial molester of adolescent girls! That’s up to the people of
Alabama to decide.”
Some win. Some omelet.
No comments:
Post a Comment