By Noah Rothman
Monday, January 95, 2026
The invasion of Iraq “continues to weaken the United
States,” the legacy Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung observed 20 years on from the
invasion. The demolition of Saddam Hussein’s regime had discredited
“conservative internationalism,” rendered America incapable of leading global
opposition to land grabs like Vladimir Putin’s adventurism in Ukraine, and made
it “more difficult to mobilize the global South” against revisionist powers.
The paper attributed those consequences to the psychological malaise America’s
experience in Iraq imposed on its citizens — a crippling insecurity NZZ’s
contributors did not welcome.
So-called “Iraq syndrome,” a variant of its far more
debilitating cousin “Vietnam syndrome,” was apparent in the GOP’s internal
debates over the prudence of confronting Putin in Ukraine, NZZ correspondent
Christian Weisflog wrote. Ronald Reagan’s victory in Grenada chipped away at
post–Vietnam War weariness, and George H. W. Bush eradicated it with his
successes in Panama and the first Gulf War. By contrast, America in the Joe
Biden era seemed attached to its post-Iraq diffidence. Biden had no stomach for
America’s commitments abroad, and his Republican opponents appeared to feel the
same way. The quick and relatively bloodless military victories that made
“Vietnam syndrome” a thing of the past were hard to envision in the spring of
2023.
What a difference a president makes.
Operation Midnight Hammer, which set the Iranian nuclear
program back by years and laid the groundwork for the existential threat to the
mullahs currently convulsing Iran’s streets, was a remarkable raid. It featured the most advanced ordnance
dropped from state-of-the-art platforms. It involved complex information
security, deception, and synchronization. It demonstrated that America can
still engineer speedy military victories and take maximum advantage of the
shifting geopolitical conditions those successes unlock. But for all the acumen
displayed by U.S. armed forces during that operation, the incursion into
Venezuela that resulted in Nicolás Maduro’s capture was even more
sophisticated.
The operation began in August with the deployment of a CIA team to
Caracas. There, U.S. clandestine assets collected information, tracked Maduro’s
travel patterns, and cultivated human sources on the ground inside Venezuela —
a heartening revelation given the reports indicating that America’s
unreliability had made our would-be partners abroad reluctant to put themselves at risk. That information was
critical to the success of the raid, which was conducted by U.S. Army Delta
Force commandos who had practiced the operation for months at a scale replica
of Maduro’s safehouse. Those ground operations were supported by 150 U.S. air
assets — including electronic warfare aircraft, attack helicopters, and stealth
drones.
The president said in the raid’s wake that “the lights of
Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have,” and
he seems to have divulged a real U.S. capability. Venezuela’s state-run
electricity provider subsequently denounced the “criminal
attack” on the state’s grid. U.S. forces neutralized dozens of the Cuban intelligence and military
officials with whom Maduro surrounded himself before absconding with the despot
himself. U.S. forces suffered no fatalities in the operation. American troops
suffered only minor casualties, and no U.S. platforms were lost in the
engagement.
While the raid successfully decapitated the Venezuelan
government, it did not, however, result in regime change. For now, the Chavista
junta that has governed the country since 1999 remains intact, and it is not
clear that the Trump administration considers that outcome unacceptable.
Statements produced by Trump administration officials in the wake of Maduro’s
ouster are sometimes in conflict. Depending on the principal speaking at any
given moment, America is prepared to work with Maduro’s deputy, Delcy Rodríguez.
Or, American officials will “run” the country themselves — and without even a
modest U.S. military footprint on the ground in Venezuela.
Sometimes the legitimate Venezuelan opposition, led by
Nobel Peace Prize laureate María Corina Machado, seems to enjoy the confidence
of Trump officials. At others, she is dismissed as a marginal figure who lacks
the requisite “respect” to succeed Madruo. Sometimes, it seems the
administration is inclined to hand the state over to American oil interests, all of whom are lining up in the expectation that
Venezuela’s nationalized resources will soon be back on the market. The tactics
the U.S. used to bring Maduro to justice were impressive and straightforward,
but the strategy those tactics were designed to advance is nowhere near as
clear.
And yet, Operation Absolute Resolve was also a strategic
success. The signal America sent to anti-American great powers and rogue states
alike with the raid is a sobering one.
Maduro’s fall presents the communist Chinese with a
comprehensive embarrassment. As Nikkei’s Ken Moriyasu reported, America now threatens China’s access
to a source of foreign oil that might offset Beijing’s reliance on Iran. The
raid took place while a Chinese delegation was on the ground in Caracas —
indeed, within hours of the Chinese mission’s meeting with the
Venezuelan strongman. Beijing is fit to be tied over the insult to their
diplomatic personnel — a rare emotive display that betrays the People’s
Republic’s outrage over the setback to its efforts to establish reliable
outposts in the Western Hemisphere. “Over the past 24 hours, China’s regional
calculations have gone out the window,” the Hudson Institute’s Michael Sobolik
told Moriyasu.
Beijing has been further humiliated as a result of the
failure of its “anti-stealth” radar systems, which Taiwanese media dismissed as
“expensive
ornaments.” Those systems proved no obstacle to U.S. forces, nor did
Russia’s anti-air defense network. “Experts had warned that Venezuela’s layered
air-defense network could complicate U.S. air operations,” the Financial
Times reported. “But it apparently presented little or no resistance to
the US strike that captured President Nicolás Maduro.” In much the same way
Iran’s air defense systems were quickly decimated by Israeli and U.S. forces in
June 2025, Russia’s S-300 anti-aircraft systems were turned into scrap
over the course of 20 minutes. It is not that these Russian and Chinese assets
are unimpressive. U.S. tactics and equipment were simply superior.
The operation made a big impression on the sources who
contributed to an after-action report published by Beijing’s preferred
megaphone, the Global Times. “The key to the success of the mission was
that the US forces held the absolute superiority in terms of military might,” its
dispatch read. The indications that the U.S. penetrated and turned key
elements of Maduro’s security apparatus have rattled Beijing. “This further
demonstrated that the biggest weakness of a fortress often lies within it,”
said Chinese military affairs expert Zhang Junshe.
The trajectory of Venezuela’s political evolution is by
no means assured. Indeed, it is not obvious that the administration had any
plan for the day after Maduro was ousted. The administration’s critics are
correct to note that Operation Absolute Resolve was the beginning, not the end,
of the project on which the U.S. has embarked in Latin America. But while
America’s strategy in Venezuela is ambiguous, a number of strategic successes
are flowing from the demonstration of U.S. tactical superiority and resolve.
Today, America’s enemies are a little more nervous, and
those at home and abroad who regard the U.S. as a spent force that should
retreat from the global stage are a little quieter. It’s hard to argue with
success.
No comments:
Post a Comment