By Matthew Continetti
Monday, January 01, 2024
The
debate over American military assistance to Ukraine has lost touch with
reality. The argument in Washington is less about Ukraine’s defense and
America’s place in the world than about domestic politics ahead of the 2024
presidential election. The Ukrainian people have been drafted into America’s
culture war, with potentially terrible consequences for both nations and the
world.
At
the time of writing, Senate Republicans won’t approve additional weapons
transfers until the Biden administration takes action to close the southern
border to illegal migration and drug trafficking. House Republicans might not
vote for another aid package under any circumstances. The issue divides the
GOP. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell
support additional arms for Ukraine, but former president (and current
front-runner) Donald Trump is ambivalent, at best. Trump calls the shots in the
Republican Party.
There
is a chance that, by the time you read these words, Congress will have come
together to pass President Biden’s $105 billion request for aid to Israel,
Ukraine, Taiwan, and the southern border. Or perhaps the Biden administration
will have discovered that, thanks to an accounting error, there is enough money
to help the Ukrainians pin down and degrade the Russian military for another
year. Perhaps not. America’s support for Ukraine may be coming to an end.
No
one should have any illusions about what will happen next.
A
lapse in aid would be a coup for Russian propaganda. Vladimir Putin would
pocket another chess piece and scan the board for targets. America’s partners
would recognize the arrival of the post-American world. China’s Xi Jinping,
Iran’s Ali Khamenei, North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro, and
countless other murderers, thugs, and genocidaires would be emboldened. Cutting
off aid to Ukraine will not reduce violence or lessen the threat to America. It
will amplify the carnage. It will enhance the risk.
Some
people argue that stopping the flow of U.S. weapons to Ukraine will force
President Volodymyr Zelensky to sue for peace. Maybe—though Ukrainians seem as
willing as ever to defend their homeland. Let’s say that a broke and
empty-handed Zelensky does call for a cease-fire and negotiations. Would Putin
lay down his arms? There is no reason to think so. And yet, out of ignorance,
indifference, or malice, a great number of Americans seem to believe that our
assistance to Ukraine is what fuels this conflict. They seem to believe that
Putin would like nothing more than for the war in Ukraine to end. He does not.
On the contrary: The Russian dictator gives every indication that he is
mobilizing for years of aggression against not only Ukraine but also America
and the West.
Shortly
after the Black Sabbath of October 7, Russian officials welcomed Hamas leaders
to Moscow. The Russian government’s latest budget, authorized in November,
devotes 30 percent of spending to the military. (Defense accounts for about 12
percent of the U.S. federal budget.) As part of this buildup, Putin will add
170,000 soldiers, bringing the total size of his armed forces to 2.2 million
personnel. Also in November, Russia tested a submarine-launch intercontinental
ballistic missile. Putin has strengthened his alliances with China, Iran, and
North Korea. In early December, he traveled to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates, flexing his muscles as leader of the anti-American axis of
resistance.
The
Kremlin has identified and exploited loopholes in the sanctions levied against
Russia. The durable Russian economy, flush with petrodollars, sustains Putin’s
wars as well as Russian proxies in the Middle East and Africa. If Putin no
longer feels the bite of the Ukrainian army, he will be free to maneuver. He
will probe for weaknesses in his near-abroad and redeploy forces from Ukraine
to build situations of strength elsewhere. Though the Russians may not be able
to take Kiev, they certainly will gain territory if Ukraine lacks American aid.
Putin may “freeze” the conflict in Ukraine and pursue his interests in the
Caucasus and in Central Asia, while saber-rattling against NATO.
Taking
a cue from his frenemy Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey, Putin has seized the
migrant weapon. Russia is helping illegal migrants from the Middle East and
Africa enter the Baltic nations, pressuring democratic governments and generous
social-welfare states. Finland has sealed its border with Russia to stop the
traffic. Latvia and Lithuania are considering similar moves. Russia is
fomenting unrest in Moldova and in Bosnia, as well. According to Jacek
Siewiera, the head of Poland’s National Security Bureau, Eastern Europe must
act quickly. “If we want to avoid war,” he said on December 4, “the NATO
countries on the eastern flank should adopt a shorter, three-year time horizon
to prepare for confrontation.”
It
did not have to be this way. Ever since February 2022, when he failed to deter
Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, President Biden has played odd games with military
aid. Rather than ask for one massive supplemental bill early in the conflict,
when America was united in support for Ukraine and for President Zelensky,
Biden instead asked Congress to approve several tranches of support. Each
weapons package has been more controversial than the last.
Rather
than supply the Ukrainians with everything they ask for, and as quickly as
possible, Biden has sent over the most advanced weapons platforms reluctantly,
in dribs and drabs, while withholding airplanes, armor, and long-range
artillery that could give Ukraine an advantage. As the war went on, nationalist
populists gained ground within the GOP, demonizing Zelensky, echoing Russian
propaganda, and undermining the bipartisan consensus in favor of Ukraine. Biden
may say that America will back Ukraine for as long as it takes, but he missed
his chance to provide Ukraine with whatever it might have taken to roll back
Putin’s armies. The result is a brutal war of position in Europe, a political
stalemate in the United States, and an empowered Russia.
Not
long ago, on a visit to Washington, a Ukrainian parliamentarian (and member of
the opposition) delivered a grim assessment of the battlefield. He observed
that this year’s Ukrainian counteroffensive culminated in limited gains, and
that Russia is now on offense. He acknowledged the widening divisions in
Ukraine, between Zelensky and political rivals and between Zelensky and parts
of the military. He expressed concern that Ukrainian morale might waver if the
United States cuts off aid. Yet he remained hopeful that America will continue
to support his resilient country.
I
asked him why. The parliamentarian replied that few members of Congress oppose
weapons transfers to Ukraine in principle. Most critics take aim instead at the
economic assistance we give to the Ukrainian government and civil society.
What’s more, he said, the United States does not have a choice in the matter.
The strategic price of leaving Ukraine to fend for itself is too high. America
can’t afford it.
Abandoning
Ukraine to the Russian bear would be a catastrophe of greater magnitude than
the retreat from Afghanistan in 2021. The Afghan rout damaged America’s
credibility. Defeat in Ukraine would shake the foundations of the transatlantic
alliance and NATO and green-light a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Incompetence in
Afghanistan pulled Biden’s approval ratings underwater. Losing two wars in one
term would doom his reelection. The Taliban, for the moment, seem to be
limiting their malign behavior to the Afghan people and to Pakistan. Vladimir
Putin’s ambitions—and those of his Chinese patron—are global.
Opponents
of aid to Ukraine evade the reality of Putin’s intent. For more than a
decade—first in the republic of Georgia, then in Crimea and the Donbas, in
Syria, and in the rest of Ukraine—Putin has sought to resurrect the Soviet
Empire. He pursued his objective unencumbered until he met resistance in the
battle for Kiev. If America abandons the fight for freedom in Ukraine, Putin
won’t change. He won’t falter. He won’t stop. And the danger in which we will
soon find ourselves will be matched only by our dishonor.
No comments:
Post a Comment