By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, January 24, 2024
A
headline in the Wall Street Journal today reads:
“Chipotle to Offer New Benefits to Draw Younger Workers for Burrito Season.”
What
I found striking is that “Burrito Season” is a thing we’re supposed to know is
a thing. In other words, while I didn’t know that burrito—or Chipotle
burrito—sales spike in the spring, I’m not that surprised to learn it. But I do
find it jarringly funny to throw around “burrito season” like “baseball season”
or “Oscar season.” Do people ask, “Are you psyched for burrito season?” Do
sewer workers say, “Next year, we’ve got to be better prepared for burrito
season.”
Anyway,
speaking of seasons and increases in gross crap tonnage, this is technically
the heart of primary season. But it really doesn’t feel like it. Barring some
events that we normally don’t consider part of normal primary
seasons—unprecedentedly old candidates dying, breaking a hip, yelling at
clouds, speaking in tongues, or being put in jail—it’s already pretty clear who
the nominees will be. And both presumptive nominees and their parties are ready
to start the presidential campaign season—which traditionally doesn’t start
until after Labor Day—right now.
Also,
primary season is the busy season for political pundits, and there’s no
shortage of punditry—from excellent to excremental—out there. I have all sorts
of points to make on this front that probably span that spectrum to one degree
or another. But I’ll focus on what I think is the most important one.
The
basic dynamic right now is that Donald Trump has an insurmountable advantage
among people who strongly identify as Republicans and a very significant
advantage among people who are willing to identify as Republicans at all. Nikki
Haley’s strengths are the inverse. She has a massive advantage among people
willing to vote Republican, but not for Trump. Some of these people still
describe themselves as Republican, but odds are good that they’re a little
embarrassed to say so. A larger chunk of these voters are self-described
independents who either were once Republicans but left the party in disgust, or
who are authentic conservative-leaning swing voters who do not want to vote for
Joe Biden but also don’t want to vote for Donald Trump.
In
other words, Haley leads with the voters who traditionally spell the difference
between a winning majority coalition and losing, rump coalition.
“In
a polarized country, any candidate has to win 90% or more of their party to win
an election,” Whit Ayres, a widely respected veteran Republican pollster and
strategist, told
the Wall Street Journal. “You can’t be competitive if you’re
not close to 90%.”
As
it stands right now, Trump cannot get 90 percent of Republicans. In New
Hampshire, 21 percent of Republicans said they would not vote for him if he
were the nominee. (In Iowa, 15 percent of Republicans said they wouldn’t vote
for Trump in the general election.) A whopping 68 percent of independents who
voted in the Republican primary said that they will not vote for him in the
general. Admittedly, New Hampshire is top-heavy with independents, which is why
Haley’s chances in future primaries are so slim. But if that number is remotely
representative of independents nationally, Trump’s chances in a two-person race
are dismal. As the Journal reports,
Trump won independents by 4 points in 2016, but lost them by 13 points in 2020.
As
I wrote last week, convincing former Trump voters who turned their back on him
in 2020 that they were wrong to do so would be difficult under normal
circumstances. But these are hardly normal circumstances. The former supporters
who refused to vote for him last time have seen Trump try to steal an election,
talk about goons and thugs convicted in court as “hostages,” demand the
suspension of the Constitution, and promise to be a dictator on Day One of his
administration. Just last night, they saw Trump vow revenge on Haley and
humiliate Sen. Tim Scott.
They’ve
also watched as the GOP has put in yeoman efforts to convince people that it is
fine with all of this. There’s been virtually zero signaling from the
Republican Party that its leaders would do their patriotic best to keep Trump’s
worst tendencies in check, the way many did last time. Not everyone has said
forthrightly, “He can do whatever he wants,” but in their deafening silences,
obsequious endorsements, and embarrassing dismissals of criticisms, they’ve
sent that message.
Meanwhile,
the loudest voices of the right have worked assiduously to convince
voters—their voters and all the other voters, too—that they are fine with being
enablers of Trump’s worst instincts. And many have shouted that if you’re not
willing to be a human footstool for Trump as he climbs his figurative white
horse, you are unwelcome in the party. Marjorie Taylor Greene told MSNBC that
“any Republican” who isn’t willing to do likewise will be eradicated from
the party.
Apparently, Pauline
Kael didn’t actually say, “I can’t believe Nixon won. I don’t know anyone
who voted for him.” The actual quote was, “I live in a rather special world. I
only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where [Nixon voters] are I don’t
know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel
them.” Millions of Trump voters live in a similar “special world.” And that’s
fine. The problem for Republican politicians, party officials, and the MAGA
media industrial complex, is that they’re operating as if that special world is
much larger than it is. They’re convinced that Trump—who never won the popular
vote, and who, in 2016, got a lower share of it than Mitt Romney did in
2012—can win with just the votes of those who really love him. But more people
have always disliked him than liked him. They may be distributed in ways that
keep the Electoral College a viable path to the presidency, but “the people”—or
even a majority of the people—have never actually rallied to him.
Many
Republican politicians and media personalities know this, but it is in their
political or financial interest to pretend they don’t. But many rank-and-file
MAGA Pauline Kaels don’t know this. One reason: They believe Trump when he says
he beat Biden “by a lot.” They’re not all fools, but they have all been fooled.
Regardless, the belief that the 2020 election was stolen is now a kind of
litmus test issue that divides the party as starkly as any policy issue. In the
Iowa Caucus entrance
poll, Haley beat Trump 53-11 among those who believed Biden won. In New
Hampshire, the number was
76 to 13. Ask yourself: Would Trump attack any Republican for wavering on
abortion, guns, or Ukraine with a fraction of the rage he would dole out for
forthrightly saying he didn’t win in 2020? I doubt it.
The
stolen election lie is, of course, a stand-in for blind loyalty to Trump, which
is the fundamental litmus issue of the Trumpified GOP. Love me, love my
lies.
And
this is where the punditry portion ends. If the Republicans don’t want you
unless you agree to embrace Trump-in-Full, accept their terms.
Every day, the drumbeat to unify the party and rally to Trump grows louder. It
will become deafening soon enough. Many of the people who say now that they
won’t vote for Trump will cave. Many of the critics—possibly even Haley, though
I hope not—will “come home.” Don’t. Please.
The
Trumpists are clear: They want you to bend, to negotiate away your concerns and
objections, while they stick by theirs. They appeal to your loyalty, while
offering none in return. They want the political equivalent of a forced
conversion to their faith. The old, traditional, notion of party loyalty
involved reciprocity, an implicit transaction. You get our support in exchange
for your support. That’s not the bargain here. Trump gets your support and you
get whatever he deigns to give you. Ronald Reagan used to say something like,
“if you agree with me on 7 out of 10 issues, you’re my 70 percent friend, not
my 30 percent enemy.” There are people who see Trump through a similar prism,
and for understandable reasons. They like a lot of things done by the first
Trump administration and want more. But what they don’t see is that for Trump,
the only nonnegotiable issue is him. You can love him or fear
him, but you can’t question him. If he changes policies, that’s his
prerogative, and you’re obliged to change yours too.
I
do not want Joe Biden to be president again. But that doesn’t obligate me, or
anyone else, to vote for Donald Trump. Indeed, the people voting for Haley or
who voted for Ron DeSantis do not want Joe Biden to be president again, either.
But the party establishment—and yes, Trump is the establishment candidate—want
you to sacrifice your integrity, your judgment, or your patriotism, under the
theory that you can’t be a real Republican unless you’re all in for Trump. Not
his policies, him.
Take
them at their word when they tell you the price of admission. Don’t pay it. If
they don’t want you, don’t give them your support for free. I’m not going to
rehearse all the reasons I think Trump is unfit for office. I won’t wax lyrical
on how dangerous it is to have a president who believes all constraints on his
will and desire are illegitimate. Instead, I’ll just point out that the
Republican Party can never, ever, be a majority party again unless and until
the party realizes it needs more votes than those it can take for granted. The
only way to break the fever is for the party to internalize the fact it needs
more voters than those who fill the ranks of a cult of personality.
As
I said earlier, I don’t think Trump can win a two-person race against Biden.
But he can win because I don’t think it’ll be a two person
race. That’s a topic for more punditry another time. But if I’m right, it’s
worth contemplating that Trump will be far kinder to voters who vote for
socialists and crackpots, and take away votes from Biden as a result, than he
will be to principled conservatives who want the Republican Party to be more
than a plaything for a narcissistic demagogue. Which is to say, he doesn’t care
about any issues other than his own self-interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment