By Noah Rothman
Friday,
January 05, 2024
On
Thursday night, Politico revealed that the Biden White House is
preparing for a “wider, protracted regional conflict” to emerge from the war
against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. But that’s not much of a revelation. The more
surprising discovery Politico inadvertently exposed is that
the White House is beginning to reluctantly acknowledge the existence of that
very “wider, protracted regional conflict,” which has been both active and
observable since the 10/7 massacre.
Really,
what gave it away? Was it the upwards of 118 separate attacks on U.S. soldiers in Iraq and
Syria by Iran-backed militias? Was it the multiple retaliatory airstrikes Biden approved on positions
occupied by Iranian proxies and Iranian
Revolutionary Guards Corps-linked facilities in the region, the latest
of which occurred only yesterday afternoon? Maybe it was the campaign of terror
and armed piracy in the Gulf of Aden by the Iran-backed Houthi militia group,
which has all but closed the Suez Canal to international commerce.
Who’s to say?
That
wasn’t the most shocking revelation in Politico’s latest report.
Indeed, even the humiliating discovery that the Biden White House has “for
months behind the scenes urged Tehran to persuade the proxies to scale back
their attacks,” only to be rebuffed, somehow fails to shock. What was most
unnerving in this Politico dispatch is that the outlet
forecast Biden’s “plans to hit back at Iran-backed Houthi militants” as though
that was news.
Observers
of this conflict have been following the administration’s plans to restore
deterrence in the Red Sea and once again guarantee the maritime transit of
global commerce for nearly a month. On December 6, Politico revealed that U.S. military officials had “drafted
options to hit back against the Houthis, though they are not actively pushing
those plans at this time” in the fear that Biden might execute one of those
options. Ten days later, Politico informed the public that the
White House had reached the “actively weighing” stage of deliberations over the prospect
of a retaliatory response against Houthi targets. As of the most recent
reporting, the White House was still “drawing up plans to intervene
directly against the” terror group.
All
this drawing and weighing is no longer news. It hasn’t been for some time.
What is news is the Biden administration’s inexplicable
reluctance to execute any of the options the Pentagon has presented to him.
And
it is inexplicable, if only because the rationale that supposedly explains the
White House’s reluctance keeps changing. Sometimes Biden is afraid of sparking
a broader conflict — one that, by all accounts, is already upon them.
Sometimes, it’s because the administration doesn’t want to appear to be on the
same side as the odious Saudis in their long-simmering conflict with the
Houthis. Occasionally, we are told that Biden is actually seeing to the Saudis’
interests. After all, what Riyadh supposedly wants more than anything is a
durable settlement to the civil war in Yemen, and acknowledging the existence
of the Houthi’s terror campaign would throw a wrench in those works.
None
of it adds up. Meanwhile, Western prestige erodes by the day, and the
international trade regime maintained by the United States degrades further.
What is obvious
is that the Biden administration is self-deterred. Its fear of sparking a
broader conflict with Iran has given Iran a free hand to test its freedom of
action, and it will continue to probe its parameters until it encounters a hard
target. Unless the costs of this regional terror campaign outweigh the
benefits, it will continue and, indeed, become more reckless. Already, those
benefits include humiliating the United States, forcing it to move assets
around the region and expend vast stores of defensive ordnance, and a clear
demonstration that it can close the Gulf of Aden through proxies at a time of
its choosing. From Tehran’s view, those are real, tangible gains. The costs
required to outweigh them grow with every successful provocation. The longer
Biden waits, the bigger the event necessary to arrest this tempo of operations.
What
is staying Biden’s hand? That’s the story. The existence of plans, none of
which the president seems inclined to act on, is not.
No comments:
Post a Comment