By Mark
Krikorian
Wednesday,
June 07, 2023
You know
those websites listing celebrities you thought were dead but are still around?
The Southern Poverty Law Center might as well have been on such a list.
The
“civil rights” group has been lying low for some time, since the eruption of
multiple humiliating scandals involving racism and sexual
harassment that led to the firing of most of the group’s leadership, including
founder Morris Dees.
The
appearance of its annual “hate map” was months late, raising suspicions that
there were changes afoot. No such luck — the latest anathema was just
pronounced. (Google it yourself, if you want to see it.)
The
Center for Immigration Studies is still there, of course; after operating for
three decades, we graduated to “hate group” status right
after Trump’s election in 2016 — coincidentally.
The
other usual targets are still there as well: Alliance Defending Freedom, Center
for Security Policy, Family Research Council, etc.
But in
what I assume is a bid to goose donations (and add to its half-billion-dollar
hoard of cash), the SPLC has added parents’-rights groups like Moms for Liberty
to the hate map. (Tyler O’Neil, author of Making Hate
Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Daily Signal’s
indefatigable SPLC-watcher, is on the case.)
But the
SPLC may be facing an unprecedented challenge. Earlier this year, a defamation
lawsuit against it for a “hate group” designation was, for the first time
ever, not dismissed and has made it to the discovery stage.
The Dustin Inman Society — run by
immigration-enforcement dynamo D. A. King in Georgia — was classified as a
“hate group” in 2018, right after the SPLC registered as a lobbying
organization to oppose a bill King supported in the state legislature. (Coincidentally.)
Defamation
is hard to prove under U.S. law. D. James
Kennedy Ministries tried
and failed. We at CIS tried a different tack, filing a civil RICO suit against SPLC, but also failed.
(The multimillion-dollar settlement SPLC paid to Muslim reformer
Maajid Nawaz meant his lawsuit never went to trial. The reasons for the
settlement have never been revealed.)
But SPLC
was sloppy in smearing the Dustin Inman Society, and King saw an opening. So
last year he filed suit. The first case was dismissed and
so King filed suit again, and this time, in April of this year, the judge
allowed the case to proceed to discovery, with discovery due by April of next
year.
No one
has ever gotten a look at SPLC’s internal machinations, and staff
communications and other files regarding the plaintiffs could well turn over
rocks that SPLC would prefer to keep in place.
But
discovery can be expensive — masses of emails and other documents to go
through, opposing counsel obstructing at every turn — I shudder to think of the
cost.
King
doesn’t have deep pockets — he’s had to take out two mortgages just to keep
going. Which is why he needs the support of anyone who wants to see some
sunlight shed on the SPLC’s shenanigans. To help fund its fight for justice,
the Dustin Inman Society has a GoFundMe page, and one at GiveSendGo. I’ve donated myself; this is not a grift.
It’s not every day that an opportunity like this comes along to get
accountability from one of the worst actors on the left. Don’t squander
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment