By
Luther Ray Abel
Sunday,
June 18, 2023
“Ron
DeSantis Is Young, Has Little Kids and Wants America to Know It,” reads a
headline from the New York Times. In the story, Nicholas Nehamas
and Ruth Igielnik write:
One of the few candidates with kids still at home, Mr. DeSantis
regularly highlights his parental worries about schools and popular culture as
he presses his right-wing social agenda.
When he signed the state budget on Thursday, he joked that a tax break on
one of parenthood’s most staggering expenses — diapers — had come too late for his
family, though not by much.
“I came home, and my wife’s like, ‘Why didn’t you do that in 2019 when
our kids were still in diapers?’” Mr. DeSantis said.
The evident goal is to draw a stark contrast with his main rivals,
President Biden, 80, and former President Donald J. Trump, who just turned 77,
both grandfathers who have sons (Hunter and Don Jr.) older than Mr. DeSantis.
Voters have expressed concern about the age and fitness of both men, especially Mr.
Biden.
The
piece details a man who is aware of the power of a family that looks like what
most Americans imagine their families to be — young and beautiful. Of course,
the Times being the Times, they note:
His conservative views on abortion, climate change and how race is
taught — among
other issues — have left Mr. DeSantis out of step with many members of his own
generation. Majorities of voters in his age bracket want abortion to be legal
in all or most cases, think climate change is a very serious problem and
support the Black Lives Matter movement. Only about one in four voters between
the ages of 35 and 49 have a favorable view of Mr. DeSantis, according to the
Quinnipiac poll.
The Times is
factually incorrect — 39 percent of those between 35 and 49 had a favorable
view of DeSantis in that May poll. A comparison is made to the similarly
youthful Barack Obama of 2008, who enjoyed immense popularity with people his
age. The Times doesn’t explain why it matters that DeSantis is
unpopular with those his age. It so happens that DeSantis is second only to
Trump in popularity on the Republican ticket — other GOP candidates rate much
more poorly on name recognition. (More than half the respondents reported that
they “hadn’t heard enough” about Nikki Haley.)
Then
there’s the Washington Post‘s lengthy profile of Casey DeSantis by
Ruby Cramer, which is, if nothing else, a fascinating effort by a left-wing
female reporter to ease around adjectives and clichés that sound misogynistic
to many ears. Cramer has to reckon with a conservative woman who is smart
enough to trim her social life to the bare minimum in the service of a higher
goal while also managing to be charming and comely in public — a rare
combination. Cramer is incapable of finding anyone close to the DeSantises,
with every possible angle accounted for. Amusingly, even Casey’s hairdresser
refuses to talk. Cramer writes:
As a unit, Ron-and-Casey, one word, have become one of the most guarded
and feared partnerships in politics. In the shifting light, they could have the
look of a traditional husband and wife — or of two modern partners, coequals in
life and work, a couple in their 40s, next-generation. Often, he deferred to
her. And often, she deferred to him.
The
whole thing is worth reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment