By Kevin D. Williamson
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
Writing on Monday about Hillary Rodham Clinton’s ongoing
e-mail problems, Young Master Ian relayed this from Leon Panetta, former
secretary of defense and longtime Clinton-family sycophant: “I really do think
it’s time for the candidates and for the American people to move on.”
Interesting choice of words: move on.
“Move on” is of course the Clinton family motto. If the
Clintons had a family crest, the Latin at the top would read: “movete!”
In fact, you can quickly get a read on a particular
individual or organization’s dedication to kissing Clinton ass by noting how
quickly it deployed “move on!” and how deeply it is dedicated to that motto.
The gold standard there for many years was MoveOn.org.
For you youngsters out there, MoveOn.org is a self-described progressive group
that was founded in 1998 in response to the impeachment of President Bill
Clinton, who committed perjury and suborned perjury in the course of trying to
cover up his sexual exploitation of White House intern Monica Lewinsky, a crime
for which he eventually was disbarred, though Senate Democrats ensured that his
impeachment did not end in conviction and removal from office. Once he had
exhausted every possible avenue of dishonesty, Clinton issued an angry
denunciation that nearly took the form of an apology, and his minions
immediately began demanding that the country “move on!”
MoveOn.org was founded by Clinton toadies for the purpose
of Clinton toadying, though it eventually succumbed to what we must understand
as a corollary to O’Sullivan’s First Law of Politics. O’Sullivan’s First Law,
which comes to us from my friend and former National
Review editor John O’Sullivan, holds: “Any institution that is not
explicitly right-wing will become left-wing over time.” The Clintons were never
exactly left-wing, but the organization dedicated to servicing them became
leftier-wingier over time, and endorsed Bernie Sanders over Mrs. Clinton this
time around after a poll showed that three-quarters of its daft and barking-mad
members preferred the Vermont socialist to the Democrat in the Democratic race.
MoveOn.org has moved on. But the Clintonian motto
survives.
After President Clinton’s girl trouble obliged his
partisans to cry “move on!” his much-abused and humiliated wife was given the
junior Senate seat from New York. (And to think: Some men buy jewelry!) When
Senator Clinton found herself having to explain away more of President
Clinton’s shenanigans during a press conference — the president was accused of
peddling pardons, and her brothers, Hugh and Tony Rodham, were deep in the
scandal — the words “move on” were deployed by Mrs. Clinton’s friends in the
press and by professional apologists such as Representative Marty Meehan, today
president of the University of Massachusetts.
After her brief service in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton ran
for president and was defeated in the Democratic primary. She moved on to the
State Department, where her inept service left the country with a great deal of
moving on to do. The massacre in Benghazi and the lies Mrs. Clinton and the
Obama administration told about that? “It’s time to move on,” she said before
the ink on the official report was even dry. E-mail scandal? “move on!” says
Panetta — and Geraldo Rivera, and various Democratic peons and sub-peons from
sea to shining sea.
Move on. Funny how those exact words keep popping up.
“Move on!” is a strange demand to make on behalf of a
woman such as Mrs. Clinton. “Move on!” means drawing a line at the current
moment in the timeline, leaving the past to the past and dedicating now to the
future. That sounds appealing from a certain addlepated and idealistic point of
view, but if you are running on a long record in public office and on your
experience, insisting that the past is a foreign country is odd, indeed. In
2008, a young and fresh-faced Barack Obama might have plausibly used “move on!”
as a slogan: The country certainly was ready to move on from the Bush years,
and he was youthful, energetic, and relatively new to the scene. Mrs. Clinton
has many qualities that she might offer voters, but she soon will be running
hard up against her 70th birthday, and her campaign of 1990s nostalgia
represents the opposite of a break with the past. She is offering the very
freshest political thinking of 1968 when she isn’t sidelined into the latest
cutting-edge policy ideas from 1916.
Move on? She’d be lucky to catch up.
But consider this: President Clinton’s performance in
office demanded a “move on!” Mrs. Clinton’s performance as first lady, aiding
and abetting her husband’s various misdeeds (which were far from limited to
sexually preying on the help) inspired a great deal of “move on!” Mrs.
Clinton’s time in the Senate called for a “move on!” of its own. Her tenure as
secretary of state was “move on!” after “move on!” after “move on!” She’s still
demanding we “move on!” today, and her hangers-on sing a “move on!” chorus day
and night.
It says something about the Clintons that every time a
member of that sorry clan is given a position of public trust, it ends with a
demand that we forget how they abused that trust and instead “move on!”
Most peculiar.
No comments:
Post a Comment