By Kevin D. Williamson
Monday, March 9, 2015
Venezuela had a good run of it for about five minutes
there, at least in public-relations terms. When petroleum prices were booming,
all it took was a few gallons of heating oil from Hugo Chávez to buy the
extravagant praise of House members, with Representative Chaka Fattah (D.,
Philadelphia) issuing statements praising Venezuela’s state-run oil company
“and the Venezuelan people for their benevolence.” Lest anybody feel creeped
out by running political errands for a brutal and repressive caudillo, Joseph Kennedy
— son of Senator Robert Kennedy — proclaimed that refusing the strongman’s
patronage would be “a crime against humanity.” Kennedy was at the time the
director of Citizens Energy, which had a contract to help distribute that
Venezuelan heating oil — Boss Hugo was a brute, but he understood American
politics.
Celebrities came to sit at his feet, with Sean Penn
calling him a “champion” of the world’s poor, Oliver Stone celebrating him as
“a great hero,” Antonio Banderas citing his seizure of private businesses as a
model to be emulated in the rest of the world, Michael Moore praising his use
of oil for political purposes, Danny Glover celebrating him as a “champion of
democracy.” His successor, Nicolás Maduro, continued in the Chávez vein, and
even as basics such as food and toilet paper disappeared the American Left
hailed him as a hero, with Jesse Myerson, Rolling Stone’s fashionable uptown
communist, calling his economic program “basically terrific.” Some of the more
old-fashioned liberals at The New Republic voiced concern about Venezuela’s
sham democracy, its unlimited executive authority, political repression, the
hunting down of government critics, the stacking of elections and the
government’s perpetrating violence inside polling places — but Myerson insisted
that Venezuela’s “electoral system’s integrity puts the U.S.’s to abject
shame.” Never mind that opposition leaders there are hauled off to military
prison after midnight raids.
Vice President Biden, who can always be counted on to cut
straight to the heart of any political question, ran into Maduro in Brazil and,
noting the potentate’s thick mane, commented: “If I had your hair, I’d be
president of the United States.” Tragically for the Sage of Delaware, hair
transplants don’t work that way.
That is all going down the memory hole. The Obama
administration has announced economic sanctions on Venezuela’s rulers and its
intelligence agents, citing the “erosion of human-rights guarantees” – erosion,
as though this were something new, as though Hugo Chávez hadn’t been a tyrant
back when President Obama’s ally Representative Fattah was carrying his
political water all over the eastern seaboard. In the New York Times’ account
of Venezuela’s woes and Maduro’s misrule, there is no mention at all of the
critical role the American Left played in lending legitimacy to Chavismo, of
the so-called liberals and progressives who denounced legitimate protests
against Maduro’s brutality as nefarious U.S.-backed coup attempts, who remained
— and remain — silent on the regime’s censorship, political repression,
torture, and economic incompetence. William Neuman of the Times did find an
economist — a leftist economist, he assures us — who went so far as to say that
certain aspects of the Chávez program “needed to be revised or even discarded
to set the nation’s economy on the right track.”
There is never a reckoning for the Left. An entire
generation of American intellectuals found itself enraptured by the brutal,
repressive, terroristic political apparatus of the Soviet Union — not only
journalistic enablers like Walter Duranty of the Times and the various
Hollywood reds and Communist party operatives, but the purportedly enlightened
liberals at The New Republic, who were consistent apologists for Soviet
brutality at home and abroad at the height of Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror.
Scores of Americans, some of them in high government office, were working on
behalf of one of history’s most murderous and repressive regimes — and the bad
guys in that story are, in the popular imagination, the people who worked to
expose that conspiracy, rather than the people who worked to advance it.
Noam Chomsky has for decades been in the business of
peddling excuses for every gang of murderers flying his preferred flag — the
Khmer Rouge, the Sandinistas, and Mao Zedong’s regime among them. Professor
Chomsky was, while it suited him, literally a holocaust denier — a denier of a
Communist holocaust rather than a National-Socialist one. Jane Fonda was a game
propagandist for the murderous Beijing-backed regime in Vietnam and proclaimed
that if we really understood Communism we’d be “on our knees praying” for it.
(On our knees: The Left always tells us what it wants, if we’re listening.)
The sundry Communist regimes coddled and celebrated by
the American Left managed to kill something on the order of 100 million people
during the 20th century. Consider that a lesson unlearnt: In our own time, the
anti-fracking movement does the bidding of ex-KGB boss Vladimir Putin’s regime,
and so-called progressives such as Thom Hartmann are quite pleased to work
hand-in-glove with a Kremlin-backed propaganda network.
Things will come to a bad end in Venezuela. Sean Penn
won’t be there for it, and neither will Chaka Fattah. Perhaps the ghost of
Walter Duranty will file a report.
No comments:
Post a Comment