By John R. Puri
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
For four years, the Biden administration and the media
kept telling us that the crisis at the southern border was out of the
president’s hands because it was caused by international, uncontrollable “root
causes” of migration. No matter what policy changes Biden made, millions of
migrants would keep showing up. They were pushed out of their home countries by
forces beyond domestic politics, like poverty and violent conflict — as though
these were novel developments.
This was the official line from beginning to end. In
March 2021, two months after Joe Biden was sworn in, he assigned Vice President Kamala Harris to help stem the flow
of migration by addressing its “root causes” in poor Latin American countries.
The administration rarely specified what forces or events it was referring to.
Almost three years later, in 2024, Secretary of Homeland
Security Alejandro Mayorkas said in an interview that the migration crisis was
not specific to
the United States’ southern border. This is something that we are seeing
throughout the hemisphere and throughout the world. We have an increase in
authoritarian regimes. We have more extreme weather events that are driving
people from their homes. We have poverty. And America is proving to be
prosperous with more than 8 million jobs that need to be filled. We recovered
from the COVID pandemic more rapidly than any other country. This is something
that is not specific to the southern border.
Based on such defeatism, media outlets concurred that the
administration was helpless to deal with record border crossings.
Time magazine wrote in 2023: “There’s very little a
homeland security secretary or an American President can do to reverse human
migration patterns predominantly caused by climate change, new storm patterns,
rampant violence and economic need.”
The New Yorker wrote in 2023: “Much of the migration
to the United States in recent years has been driven by profound developments
in Central and South America and in the Caribbean, where economic turmoil,
natural disasters, and drug-related violence have brought many states to the
brink of collapse, and where gangs and drug cartels often operate beyond state
control.”
The Cato Institute told Axios in 2024 that “apprehension
numbers have little to do with changes in enforcement tactics or new policies,”
because “it’s really primarily reflective of the state of the U.S. economy,”
and “the smuggling networks have taken years to build out — but once they’re
built out, there’s nothing you can do to rewind the clock and eliminate those.”
Axios
itself wrote in 2024: “Much of the current crisis is rooted in factors
Biden’s team has had little control over — including unprecedented global
calamities that have pushed millions of migrants to the U.S., decades of
congressional inaction, and the state of key agencies after the Trump
administration.”
Mayorkas told PBS that year, “We can only do so much within
a broken immigration system, a system that is fundamentally broken,” since the
problem was “hemispheric and global.”
Then, in 2025, the Trump administration entered office
and immediately changed border policy by shutting down pathways to admission.
In the administration’s first full month, border encounters fell to the lowest level in recorded history — 8,349, compared to
140,641 the year before and 29,105 just a month earlier — and have pretty much stayed at that level ever since. The record was
beaten again in July 2025, with just 4,592 encounters.
So much for those supposedly insurmountable “root causes.” When the push factors of migration — poverty and conflict in home countries, attractive conditions in America — are relatively constant, it turns out that policy incentives are what really matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment