By Daniel Foster
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
JD Vance previewed a possible 2028 argument, one he will
no doubt have to make a few hundred times, on the question of corruption and
self-dealing inside the Trump administration.
In an interview with Mark Halperin, Vance said, “I just don’t understand the
argument that politics has somehow made Donald Trump or his family much better
off. I mean, their lives were nearly destroyed, their business was nearly
destroyed, they tried to throw the president in jail for something like 900
years. So I don’t see the benefit there.” Later he adds, “It’s laughable to me
the idea that Donald Trump has somehow been enriched by political office.”
Vance does say there is a separate concern “that
sometimes gets muddled” with the first one, that D.C. is simply “too corrupt of
a town” and people may be selling access. But, adds Vance, he hasn’t seen any
evidence of that as far as Trump.
Credit to Vance, it’s as good an argument as is available
to him. The bad news is it’s still not very good. The core rhetorical maneuver
is to make the question a net–net proposition. That is, have Donald Trump and
his family (and friends) materially gained more from his presidencies than
they’ve lost. That gives Vance some leverage with voters who found the
post–January 6 lawfare against Trump outrageous, as they’ll presumably weigh
the costs heavily. The problem is it’s hard to weigh them at a couple of billion
dollars. That’s the value of Trump family crypto ventures alone, just to pick
one simple number. The potential gains extend far beyond that one slice, and
there exist multiple other efforts to track them — of various methodologies,
scopes, and levels of trustworthiness — that go as high as $4 billion. They
also include business dealings that exist on a spectrum from the merely
unseemly to the actively outrageous, so mileage will vary on what gets counted
as kosher. Regardless, there’s already plenty of evidence, and two years of
House Democratic control will undoubtedly furnish more still.
Vance leaves himself room to pivot on the campaign trail
to a familiar good czar and bad boyars argument. That the real problem is that
the opportunists around Trump took advantage of his good name for their own
greedy ends. And that it will take another four to eight years to properly
finish draining the swamp. Color me skeptical, but a lot can happen in two
years.
In any case, it’s already a problem. A recent Fox poll showed the top concern among voters heading
into the election is government corruption, with 88 percent extremely or very
concerned. That includes 47 percent of Republicans who said they were extremely
concerned. I’ve seen some commentary that the question may be capturing
MAGA-leaners who think about corruption primarily in terms of Somali daycares,
and there’s probably some of that. But the same poll shows a majority of respondents trust Democrats more than Republicans
to address the issue. Less ambiguous is a Washington Post–ABC News–Ipsos poll showing nearly
two-thirds of Americans believed Trump was using the presidency to enrich
himself. That included 34 percent of Republicans and Republican leaners, half
again more than said they had the same concern last year.
Heading into the lame-duck half, this doesn’t strike me
as friendly territory for Vance.
No comments:
Post a Comment