By Noah Rothman
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
The capitalist enterprise is alive and well, even in that
“paragon of collectivism,” as the Wall Street Journal put it: Sweden.
“Today, nearly half of primary healthcare clinics are
privately owned, many by private-equity firms,” reporter Tom Fairless observed
this week. “One in three public high schools is privately run, up from 20% in
2011. School operators are listed on the stock exchange.”
In addition, Sweden’s market-oriented reforms have
transformed it into an investment hub. “Sweden’s economy is expected to grow by
around 2% a year through 2030,” the report added — a level of growth that would
keep pace with the United States and eclipse its industrialized European
neighbors, like France and Germany.
Even more impressive is what Sweden is doing with its
newfound wealth: shrinking the size of the state. Stockholm has lowered its
overall tax burden, reduced its health care and welfare expenditures, and
created incentives for private-sector actors and charities to take on what were
once government mandates.
Fairless’s report might come as a shock to American
progressives, many of whom still hold up the Scandinavian social compact as the
model of what state-dominated capitalism should look like. The Scandinavian
states, Bernie
Sanders said earlier in the decade, observe “strong democratic socialist
principles,” and they have some of the “best” and most accessible public
services in the world as a result. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, too, advocated importing the
Swedish model — at least, their confiscatory tax rates on their highest
earners. The 2018 PBS documentary “Sweden: Lessons for America?” found a striking number of Americans who believed both that the
Swedish model was socialist and that it was superior to America’s.
This misconception about the relative level of socialism
that prevails in Scandinavia has long vexed economists. Indeed, it has frustrated plenty of Scandinavians, too. When Senator
Elizabeth Warren ran for president on a platform that she claimed would emulate
the Nordic experience, onetime Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said her “protectionist impulses are not
reassuring from a European perspective.”
What America’s democratic socialists are praising is a
bygone era in Swedish politics that the Swedes themselves remember as the bad
old days. When the Social Democratic Party was in power in the middle of the
20th century, it sharply increased public spending and taxation rates. “The
changes triggered a long period of weak growth, stagnant after-tax incomes, and
ballooning budget deficits and debt that culminated in a banking crisis in the
early ’90s,” Fairless observed.
Today, however, the wealthy are flocking back to Sweden,
and they’re taking their capital with them. Swedish per capita GDP is the envy
of the European Union, and the country has become a hub of tech and telecom
innovation. Its public services have not suffered as a result of increased
privatization. Indeed, reduced public-sector costs for services like health
care create “efficiencies” that allow providers to “serve more patients.”
Students are flocking to privately operated schools, and “school choice is now
deeply entrenched in Sweden.” Even the Social Democrats, now relegated to the
opposition, support it.
With even the Scandinavians running away from their
unearned reputation as diehard collectivists, it’s not clear where America’s
democratic socialists will turn to for guidance. At least they still have Cuba.
No comments:
Post a Comment