Thursday, May 7, 2026

Katie Porter Gives California’s Game Away at the Debate

By Jeffrey Blehar

Wednesday, May 06, 2026

 

Some may ask why I’m following the race for California governor as closely as I am, given that President Trump’s endorsement of former Fox News host Steve Hilton effectively scotched the Impossible Dream: getting two Republicans through the all-party primary into November, thus forcing a 60 percent Democratic state to pick between quaffing two different flavors of conservative GOP hemlock. It was a dream too far for those National Review readers who remain locked behind the black gates of the Golden State — especially in 2026 — but alas.

 

No, the reason I’m invested in California is the comedy potential. For all its vast wealth, beauty, population, and cultural cachet, California feels like every bit as much of a failed state as Illinois or Minnesota — and all while lacking the ineffable international glamour and sparkling weather of Minneapolis or Chicago. Yet California’s political pistons still power the national Democratic engine: Most of the worst ideas and candidates you’re likely to encounter nationally still pump forth first from the bilge-pipe of the Left Coast and spread from there, because that’s where so many elite progressives still live.

 

California politics is inert, dense, yet also strangely unavoidable. Think of all the random highlights we’ve had out of the Golden State in the last calendar year alone, despite its solidly blue electoral irrelevance: the “notice me, senpai!” antics of anonymous Senator Alex Padilla, the pathbreaking horror-fiction career of Kamala Harris, the oleaginous omnipresence of unannounced presidential candidate Gavin Newsom — and all of this before we’ve even considered the brewing race to replace Newsom in Sacramento.

 

Yet it is that gubernatorial race that has really fired my coal-lump of a heart: Former Orange County Representative Katie Porter set the pace for public humiliation early on, by being the first to declare her candidacy, and also — fittingly enough — the first to dynamite her own political career with multiple on-air gaffes, including what must still rank as one of the worst major-media candidate interviews ever. But that was only the beginning, as the crabs in the California bucket reached up to pull one another down.

 

As the race drifted into the early months of 2026, it seemed as if Eric Swalwell might be the Democrat to separate himself from the pack to face off against Steve Hilton in November — that is, until Swalwell was revealed to be a depraved sex pest, known as such to all for decades. Now, the newly shaken-up field shows former California Attorney General (and Biden-era secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services) Xavier Becerra partially consolidating enough Democratic support to move forward to November, more or less by default.

 

So CNN’s gubernatorial debate from last night — perhaps the biggest forum these candidates will get before the June 2 vote — was a surprisingly entertaining vision of foreordained doom, as Becerra fell flat on his face after attacks from all sides, Tom Steyer ranted like the billionaire lunatic he is, and none of the other candidates distinguished themselves in any way. The reaction from the post-debate CNN panel was probably more entertaining than the debate itself; as Democrats talking about Democrats for a Democratic audience, their frank disappointment that these were the options on offer to Californians was palpable, and that much more sincerely delicious for it. (They seemed positively morose about the idea that Becerra would back his way into Sacramento.)

 

But it was Katie Porter who once again had the Moment of the Night, and hopefully placed the exclamation point on her failed career. Porter — always a bludgeoning know-it-all whose origin in academia manifests itself in condescending attempts at “let me tell you how it really works, kid” rhetoric — did it once again last night.

 

And it’s impossible not to notice that CNN’s panel chose not to highlight this moment, for Porter gave away far too much about the sorts of private calculations Democrats make in the state. When questioned about whether she would permit ICE to operate within the state as governor, Porter began self-righteously speaking down her nose to the audience:

 

It’s the job of the California governor to protect every single Californian. The “sanctuary state” policy is designed to make sure that our state resources, the taxpayer dollars, the public servants that we have are focusing on doing their jobs – which is not cooperating with the federal immigration authorities. These are Californians, they contribute to our economy, they pay taxes, and they’re one of the only ways our state has been growing in recent years. [Emphasis added.]

 

Just so. Leave it to Professor Katie to tell you what policymakers and pundits have known for years now: California is bleeding actual legal residents and becoming more dependent on illegal aliens — to maintain their population in the census, to maintain political pressure on other states, and to swing a bigger regulatory stick than their failing state would otherwise deserve. I congratulate Porter for being the one California politician to say the quiet part out loud about California’s changing focus — on illegal residents as opposed to legal ones. I don’t doubt they vote as well. But not for her.

No comments: