By Abe Greenwald
Friday, April 24, 2026
Last week, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani made a
video announcing his proposed new pied-a-terre tax, which targets part-time
apartments valued at or above $5 million. In the video, Mamdani stood on the
street, pointed up to a penthouse owned by Citadel CEO Ken Griffin, told
viewers that Griffin paid $238 million for the place, and scolded him for this
supposed sin.
As ever with Mamdani, his terrible policy gets the
headlines while the terrible intention behind it is surely the bigger story.
Yesterday, Citadel responded with a statement denouncing
Mamdani’s stunt and hinting that the company might pull out of developing new
office space in New York, a project that’s expected to contribute $4.5 billion
to the city’s economy.
Yes, we know that slapping wealthy job creators with
punishing taxes is bad for the city because it drives them to other locales
that will enjoy the infusion of jobs and tax revenue.
But Mamdani isn’t doing this because he thinks it will
provide jobs or raise revenues for the city. The goal is to demonize and punish
CEOs, both as a class and, more egregiously, as individuals. The goal, in fact,
was achieved by the video itself.
What kind of policy announcement calls out a single
individual by name, shows the world where the man (sometimes) lives, and
broadcasts what he paid for his penthouse? Mamdani wanted to establish Griffin
as an enemy of the left-wing mob, and surely he accomplished that.
The politics of left-wing vengeance never take into
consideration the downstream effects of policy. It doesn’t matter whether
defunding the police gets more black people killed or whether supporting Hamas
dooms Gazans. So it certainly doesn’t matter whether a pied-a-terre tax helps
or hurts New York City. All that matters is that the enemy is made to fear the
mob.
So, in the same city where UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian
Thompson was shot and killed by a radical activist less than two years ago, the
new radical mayor targets a hedge fund CEO as a villain who’s ripping off the
little guy. And at almost exactly the same time, we’ve got Mamdani’s friend and
supporter Hasan Piker appearing on a New York Times podcast talking
about revolutionary violence as it applies to CEOs committing “social murder.”
It’s not hard to see where this kind of thing leads.
Because we’ve already seen it go there.
If I were Ken Griffin, not only would I never give
another red cent to New York City. I’d consult a lawyer about hitting Mamdani
with a suit for incitement or reckless endangerment or some similar charge. He
may not have a case, but it’s worth sending a warning shot, nonetheless.
When Republicans publicly focus their ire on private
citizens, liberals take great offense. And they should.
The social-justice left loves to talk about feeling
“unsafe”? Mamdani has more than 10 million social media followers. He’s a hero
to left-wing revolutionaries around the world. How safe would you feel being
singled out by name and address in one of his vengeful Instagram videos?
What happened to that national conversation we were supposed to have about
turning down the temperature of political debate? This was a strange and
sickening week for American politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment