By Noah Rothman
Monday, April 20, 2026
The news over the weekend featured a blizzard of vaporous
claims about the status of a potential deal to extend the cease-fire between
the U.S. and Iran before it expires on Tuesday night. But each reported
breakthrough turned out to be ephemeral. In contrast to the non-events that
characterized the chatter around a second round of talks in Islamabad, however,
the situation on the ground inside Iran and in the Strait of Hormuz has proven
more dynamic.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps appears to be
attempting to seize control of the regime from the Iranian political figures
who presume to speak for it. “Bad and incomplete tweet by [Foreign Minister
Seyed Abbas] Araghchi and incorrect ambiguity-creation regarding the reopening
of the Strait of Hormuz,” the IRGC-linked Iranian outlet Tasnim reported on Friday,
scolding the foreign minister for entertaining proposals to reopen the Strait.
“Clearly, the IRGC is trying to take back control of the
talks in Pakistan,” one Jerusalem Post analysis of the emerging schism
concluded. “It is willing to make the regime look divided to achieve its
goals.”
Hours later, in one of the 27 interdictions the U.S. Navy
has conducted since it embarked on a maritime blockade of Iranian ports, U.S.
Marines conducted a hostile boarding of an Iranian-flagged cargo
vessel that evaded American ships. That vessel “is likely to have what
Washington deems dual-use items that could be used by the military onboard,” Reuters reported Monday.
In response to the seizure of its vessel, the disunited Iranian regime insisted that the Strait, which it had never
fully reopened to commercial traffic, was once again closed. What remains of
the Iranian Navy attempted to retaliate by reportedly targeting American and
U.S.-aligned ships with drones – again, according to the IRGC-affiliated Tasnim
news agency.
The Iranian regime’s inconstancy contrasts with the
apparent U.S. commitment to its blockade strategy – an undertaking that the
Pentagon reportedly plans to expand well beyond the Gulf of Oman.
“The U.S. military is preparing in coming days to board
Iran-linked oil tankers and seize commercial ships in international waters,
according to U.S. officials,” the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday.
Why not? After all, as the Brookings Institution scholar
Robin Brooks conceded, the blockade has so far succeeded in throttling Iran’s
vital exports, starving the regime of its primary economic lifeline to the
world:
In addition to the blockade, in what it’s calling Operation
Economic Fury, the Treasury Department is augmenting the financial pressure
the blockade has placed on the Iranian regime by expanding the list of
sanctioned Iran-linked vessels and targeting the foreign firms that benefit
from the illicit sale of Iranian energy exports – including Chinese banks.
The Chinese played a leading role behind the scenes in
compelling the Iranian regime to submit to talks in Islamabad in the first
place. It is possible that the U.S. blockade is sapping Beijing of its resolve
to stand with the Islamic Republic indefinitely:
In his first public remarks on the status of the Strait,
Chinese President Xi Jinping told his Saudi counterpart, Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Salman, that Hormuz should “remain open for normal passage.” In
his remarks, Xi did not single out either the U.S. or Iran as the primary
obstacle to commercial traffic.
Cynics can call the U.S. decision to blockade Iranian
ports in the middle of a ceasefire improvisatory. But one man’s improvisation
is another’s adaptiveness. Whatever else one might say about the blockade, it
has stopped Iran from dictating the tempo and terms of events in global energy
markets — the last point of Iranian leverage over the West.
Maybe that helps create the conditions for a satisfactory
cessation of hostilities. Perhaps it sets the stage for the fighting to resume
when the cease-fire sunsets on Tuesday night. What is certain is that the U.S.
is once again in control of the rhythm of events in the Strait of Hormuz.
No comments:
Post a Comment