By Kevin D. Williamson
Wednesday, February 14, 2024
My
old National Review colleague Michael Brendan Dougherty is an
horological enthusiast, as am I, which is nice in that it gives us something to
talk about other than his wretched political opinions, which are getting worse
by the day. E.g., he tweets: “All the
Russian girls that work at the watch boutiques in NY also complain that NYC is
unbelievably dirty and smelly compared to their home cities.”
Q:
Why are those nice “Russian girls” selling Breguets and Vacherons in New York,
I wonder?
One
possible answer is found in a report that is a little old but the most recent
we have:
Russia leads the developed world with the
worst sanitation record, according to
the London-based WaterAid NGO. A 2012 estimate citing official data placed the
number of Russians whose households are only equipped with outhouses at 35
million, or roughly a quarter of
the population. Of the 22.6 percent of households without a centralized sewage
system, 16.8 percent use a system of pipes connected to pit toilets, RBC cited
the State Statistics Service, Rosstat, as saying. The other 5.8 percent lack a
sewage system altogether. In rural Russia, almost two-thirds have no access to
indoor toilets, 48.1 percent of whom use outhouses and 18.4 percent do not have
a sewage system.
So reported
the Moscow Times in 2019. The Moscow Times,
being a news organization, is of course now
banned in Moscow and in the rest
of Russia.
When
that report was published, Russia was riding a gusher of oil-and-gas money.
What happened to it? Where did it get spent? Not
on the necessary things:
A
terrible accident happened in the provincial Russian city of Bryansk
when a mother, who was walking with her young child along public sidewalks,
fell into a portion of the walkway that had collapsed due to the stress of an
unmaintained sewer pipe in January 2012. The 1.5-year-old boy was swept away by
the force of the water and died. The court found the
director and the chief engineer of the Water Supply Authority guilty of
negligence, allowing the pipes to go unrepaired and thus putting citizens in
danger. It was somehow forgotten that one of the “culprits” behind the pipe
failure had been ringing the alarm on the subject for years, asking the
authorities to take immediate measures to repair the main sewage and water
collectors (which had been built in
the 1950s and 1960s) and advocating for modernisation, expansion and
maintenance since 1987.
However, no repairs were carried out in the
late Soviet times or during perestroika—and not even in the “golden early
2000s,” when Russia’s economy was abounding in oil gold. Since the
aforementioned child died as a result of falling into the collector in 2012, a
number of reports have surfaced saying that several other people in Bryansk
have also fallen into the sewer system at different locations. Some of the
victims literally sunk
into the ground beneath their feet.
Which
is to say, Russians are neck-deep—or deeper—in whatever it is Tucker Carlson is
producing these days.
Carlson,
who is doing a fantastic impersonation
of Walter Duranty—the disgraced New York Times correspondent
who treated American readers to tales of the glory of life in Joseph Stalin’s
Russia—reports
that the experience of seeing how clean and orderly Moscow is was
“radicalizing” for him. I suppose that everything in the ordinary world looks a
little dingy after La
Jolla Country Day School and that Swiss boarding school that expelled
him. And American cities can be pretty awful, it is true, a consequence
of Americans’
general contempt for public spaces. Many American tourists have had
the experience of being shocked and shamed by how spruce and lovely things are
in Amsterdam, for example—but not as many have seen the housing projects and
sprawl beyond the parts of the city tourists frequent. The difference is real,
but it is easy to exaggerate, too: You could spend a fortnight in London
without seeing the city’s unlovely side, but the same is true of Philadelphia
and Dallas.
The
irony of the Putinism and near-Putinism we see on the contemporary right—one of
the ironies, anyway—is that Moscow represents precisely what they believe
(wrongly, for the most part) Washington to be: an imperial city in which a
coddled, politically connected, decadent urban elite enrich themselves through
official influence and off-the-books relationships while scouring the
countryside for young men to recruit into their vicious wars of imperialism and
conquest. Of course the “Russian girls” MBD encounters in Manhattan boutiques
do not have a lot to say about that: If they know, they may not be inclined to
say, and if they are inclined to say, they are—or should be—terrified to do so.
That’s what terror states do: They terrorize.
They
are also pretty good at faking things. Duranty fell for it, because he wanted
to fall for it. Progressive hero Lincoln Steffens, too, who famously observed
of the Soviet Union: “I have seen the future, and it works.”
Does
it?
An
interesting metric: The poor Mexicans who are coming to the United States are
fleeing a country that is, as the IMF runs the numbers, slightly
wealthier than Vladimir Putin’s Russia, with a GDP/capita of $13,804
compared to Russia’s $13,006. And, indeed, if you visit the nice parts of
Mexico City, you will be surprised how well they compare to much of New York
City, Los Angeles, or Houston. You can have the same experience in lots of
places, some of them surprising. Much of this is just rank Thomas
Friedman-ism, mistaking the simple newness of recently developed
infrastructure in Hong Kong or Dubai for evidence of a better and more
effective social system. Newark Liberty is not much compared to the airport in
Madrid, true—but it isn’t much compared to the airport in Salt Lake City,
either. I don’t suppose there’s a doctoral thesis or a presidential campaign to
be made out of the fact that new airports are, generally speaking, nicer than
old ones, though some older airports are pretty nice, too: Palm Springs,
Zurich, Schiphol, etc.
There’s
a reason for that, too. Or reasons.
It
isn’t just about money: Aspen’s little airport isn’t really very nice or
well-run at all. Infrastructure is complicated. Cities are complicated. In the
same way you can never have the same party twice, you never have the same
traffic jam twice. There are a lot of reasons Stuttgart is so much nicer than
Detroit—and I don’t think German automotive-industry protectionism is in the
top 10. But if what you want is protectionism, then everything you see is a
case for protectionism. If what you want is Putinism, then you see evidence for
the virtues of Putinism. But don’t look too hard.
That grandiose
metro station in Moscow has long been famous in the West. The Russian
secret police arrested a number of the British engineers who built the Moscow
metro—you didn’t think Russians built that, did you?—and held an
espionage show trial for them. Lovely space, though, and, if you look,
you can still find recordings of “Songs of the Joyous Metro Conquerors.”
Hooray. New York’s subway system is a mess, and the $4
billion per mile price of the Second Avenue project is a scandal. Does
anybody think the answer is a more Putinist approach? The question is almost
too silly to ask.
I
understand not liking the United States—I really, really do understand: As I
have written before, I still love my native country, but I think we should
start seeing other people. Ours is an often ugly, often vulgar, spiritually
sick society. But turning instead for inspiration to a brutal police state in
which 1 out of 5 families do their necessary business in a hole in the ground
is—counterintuitive! Finding inspiration in the gulag where Wall
Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich currently
is held as a political prisoner—a real political prisoner, not the
victims of the “patriot purge” of Tucker Carlson’s daffy
imagination—is also counterintuitive. But, then, what Carlson was up
to in Moscow wasn’t journalism—journalism is what Evan Gershkovich did, and
what Tucker did was, at best, tourism. It is tempting to call him a
useful idiot, but he isn’t an idiot. He knows what he is doing. I myself don’t
speak Russian, but I think I could read the look on Putin’s face, which said:
“Good doggie.”
Carlson
no doubt saw the best that Moscow has to offer. But the average Russian is
worse off than the average Mexican, Bulgarian, or Panamanian. I am reminded of
our Viktor Orbán-admiring friends who see only the finest bits of Budapest,
never mind that Orbán and his ilk talk about Budapest the way his American
counterparts talk about San Francisco. I don’t think those Americans swanning
around the restaurants and nightclubs of the capital would very much enjoy life
in the parts of the country that the Orbánists celebrate. But, then, I don’t
think they’d like using a latrine pit out there in the real Russia, either.
At
what point do we just admit that these guys admire Vladimir Putin’s gulag state
for reasons other than its public hygiene? Because it sure looks to me that
Tucker Carlson and Michael Brendan Dougherty and a lot of Republicans have
something in common with Walter Duranty’s clip file and the underplumbed
Russian countryside: They’re all full of s—.
No comments:
Post a Comment