National Review Online
Tuesday,
February 27, 2024
If millions
of immigration-enforcement encounters are a statistic, the murder, by blunt
force trauma to the head, of one American young woman is a tragedy.
Negligent
enforcement policies set by the Biden administration, indulgent “sanctuary”
given to lawbreakers by our cities, and abusive appropriation of taxpayer
resources to aid aliens in their lawbreaking all likely contributed to the
killing of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old Georgia nursing student. Her death is the
result of United States policy enabling a criminally minded man who came here
to press a bogus asylum claim.
The
illegal immigrant, Jose Antonio Ibarra, who was arrested for her killing
crossed the border into Texas on September 8, 2022. He was sent to a processing
facility but was quickly “paroled” and released, as has become custom. He was
chauffeured — at your expense — by bus to New York City. He was arrested in
Queens for endangering the welfare of a child, his wife’s son, who had no
restraint or helmet as he rode on the back of Ibarra’s moped. Normally when
Immigration and Customs Enforcement learns that a removable illegal immigrant
is arrested, it requests that local law enforcement keep the person in custody
until he can be transferred to ICE and put in deportation proceedings. New York
City released Ibarra before his detainer could be issued.
Every
part of his story testifies to the barratry of the Biden administration and
Democrats. Normal visitors and tourists to the United States have their
backgrounds checked for criminal activity. But at the border, the Biden
administration has incentivized everyone who wishes to come to America, but has
no legal right to settle here, to claim asylum. Our lax enforcement encourages
so many to come claiming asylum that we overwhelm the court system that
adjudicates such claims. This overtopping of the system is then an excuse for
“processing” entrants via an asylum officer, most often not a lawyer, and
acting not upon the law but policies set by the Department of Homeland
Security. Ibarra’s own marriage was confected, according to his estranged wife,
to join and thereby strengthen their asylum cases. They were gaming the system.
At every turn, Ibarra discovered that law in the United States is not seriously
enforced.
Some
commentators will say that immigrants have a lower crime rate than American
citizens, and so in the Ibarra case we are dealing with a statistical outlier
here. Even if this were true, it is a non sequitur. The Biden administration
has a positive duty to defend our borders and to not incentivize lawbreaking.
False asylum seekers often break several laws — not just illegally crossing our
borders but working illegally, committing Social Security fraud, or obtaining
other false identification documents. The crimes of those who have no right to
be here should be counted against the authorities who knowingly enabled them to
come and to stay. That starts with the Biden administration and extends to the
cities.
Ibarra
had no right to be in this country. Authorities had ample chances to do what
the law of the land requires and bounce him back to Venezuela. They
deliberately failed to do so. The Biden administration, through its
malicious neglect and positive subversion of our immigration law, has made
itself in effect, if not by the letter of the law, an accessory to Laken
Riley’s murder.
No comments:
Post a Comment