By Noah Rothman
Monday,
February 05, 2024
Joe
Biden’s allies probably hoped that this weekend’s NBC News poll would show, as some other pollsters
have, that the president’s popularity was improving along with the economy and
consumer sentiment. Those hopes proved unfounded.
But
then, why would the administration convince itself that the president’s
relative standing with voters was an entropic phenomenon? It’s not just that
Biden’s policies (from immigration to crime and violence to the economy
broadly) are deeply unpopular. He is unpopular.
Biden’s job approval rating sank to a new low of just 37
percent. Moreover, Donald Trump maintained a 16-point advantage over Biden when
voters were asked to evaluate which of these leaders was a “competent and
effective” executive. When they were asked who has the “mental and physical
health” to be president, their answers gave Trump a significant 23-point lead
over the president.
Why
wouldn’t voters draw those conclusions? The president has given them no reason
to think otherwise. Indeed, Biden and his advisers seem to think that hiding
the president from the public would disabuse voters of their impression that
his physical condition is rapidly deteriorating. That’s a bizarre assumption,
but it’s one the president’s handlers have spent the last year
operationalizing.
In
a New York Times dispatch from February 2023,
reporters insisted that Biden would not wage the low-profile campaign he
mounted in 2020 even as they forecast a repeat of the last presidential
election cycle. The president, they noted, “intends to cut a lot of ribbons”
around the country, promoting projects funded by a 2021 infrastructure bill.
Departing from the pandemic-induced bunker mentality to which Biden’s 2020
campaign succumbed, the president would “travel frequently” and “deliver his
message” to diverse audiences. But Biden’s team would still be selective in how
they showcase the president to the public, and most of that showcasing would
occur during the president’s peak performance hours: 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Contrary
to his aides’ claims, the president’s recent conduct suggests the oft-derided “basement campaign” has made a comeback. For the second year
in a row, Biden will reportedly eschew an informal tradition of providing the
network broadcasting the Super Bowl with a pre-game presidential interview. We
must assume that is part of a deliberate communications strategy, given Biden’s
reluctance to address the nation on his decision to commit the country to a
series of dicey military ventures.
On
January 11, the U.S. and its coalition partners embarked on a sustained
campaign of retaliatory strikes on the Iran-backed Houthi militia in Yemen. On
Friday, Biden expanded that campaign with airstrikes on Iran-aligned Shiite
militias in Iraq and Syria following an attack on a U.S. outpost that took
three American lives. Given the scale of this mission and the risks associated
with a kinetic effort to reimpose caution on Iran via its proxies, the nation
deserved to hear the president make the case for this action. The consent of
the governed is a prerequisite for any sustained military campaign. But Biden
has not shown the voting public that level of respect, and voters are at
liberty to resent it.
It’s
hard to avoid the conclusion that Biden’s handlers do not want the president
overly exposed to the public. But that is an insane proposition. Biden does not
have the luxury of picking and choosing the moments when he can subject himself
to voters’ scrutiny. The basement campaign is an extravagance reserved for
those who can divorce themselves from the day-to-day business of the executive
branch. That obviously does not describe the sitting president.
Biden’s
low profile seems to have only reinforced the impression in voters’ minds that
he is unequal to the demands of the job he occupies. That is not their
impression of his challenger. If the president intends to change this
prevailing dynamic, he only has a few months left to do it. And that would
begin with the wholesale abandonment of the basement campaign 2.0 — that is, if
Biden’s physical state even allows for that possibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment