By Jonah
Goldberg
Wednesday,
June 07, 2023
Here, in
microcosm, is the dysfunction plaguing the GOP presidential field, thanks to
the Trumpian captivity.
As with
most Trumpian pronouncements, there’s no policy and no principle to be
found—other than the insinuation that Trump is courageous and his opponents are
cowards. Ron DeSantis gets the text—he’s “chicken”—Haley the subtext: She’s
simply following the Alpha Dog’s “lead,” as if the former South Carolina
governor and United Nations ambassador wouldn’t have had the fortitude to do a
CNN townhall without the benefit of Trump’s pathbreaking courage.
For what
it’s worth, the only thing that Haley’s Sunday night CNN townhall had in common
with Trump’s performance last month is that they were on the same network.
Haley was generally polite, polished, and coherent.
It’s all
so exhaustingly childish, made all the more exhausting because it works.
The
Trump campaign’s theory of the race is simply an extension of Trump’s
worldview—that politics isn’t primarily about ideas or policy but bullying and
intimidation. Trump acts like the Biff Tannen character from Back to
the Future (not entirely coincidentally as Biff’s character was
reportedly based on Trump), who dominates the nerds and
normal kids alike by his sheer willingness to be an immature jerk.
For
months now, Trump’s been testing out a slew of low-brow nicknames for Ron DeSantis, from “Rob”
to “Meatball Ron,” on the theory that name calling is more effective than
any policy position.
And, so
far, he’s right.
DeSantis’
announcement on Twitter may have been an unforced error, but it didn’t prevent
him from having a successful debut tour through Iowa and New
Hampshire. But, so far, the polls have not significantly budged.
DeSantis
is trying to take the high road. “I think it’s so petty. I think it’s so
juvenile. I don’t think that’s what voters want. And, honestly, I think that
his conduct, which he’s been doing for years now … that’s one of the reasons
he’s not in the White House now. Because I think he alienated too many voters
for things that really don’t matter. So I don’t get in the gutter for any of
that,” DeSantis said on a New Hampshire radio station.
DeSantis
is, of course, correct. If Trump could have showed a modicum of presidential
restraint and maturity when he was in the White House—particularly during the
pandemic—he probably wouldn’t have lost. That’s the subtext of DeSantis’ frequent refrain, about being a “winner” and the
need to ditch the “culture of losing.”
DeSantis
is working on the quaint assumption that Republican voters care more about
winning than about watching Trump’s schtick. Haley and most of the other
contenders have similarly endearing assumptions that base voters prioritize policy
or positivity about America and the future.
Even
Vivek Ramaswamy, who appeared on ABC’s This Week to trot out the insipid and
insidious idea that America should hand Russia a military victory, nonetheless
works on the assumption that appealing to ideas is a winning strategy.
It
reminds me of the old story about Adlai Stevenson’s remark about running for
president in the 1950s. When told “every thinking person in America will be
voting for you,” Stevenson reportedly replied, “I’m afraid that won’t do—I need
a majority.”
It’s not
that Trump voters don’t care about ideas—good or bad—or even winning. The
problem is their emotional attachment to Trump, an attachment that virtually
all of his opponents let fester and harden for years. The result is a deeply
ingrained and even more deeply debased conception of leadership and
masculinity, one that confuses boorishness for “winning.”
Mike
Pence, who filed the paperwork for his presidential bid on Monday, is a case in
point. As Trump’s vice president, Pence loyally defended his boss’ asininity
for four years—until he hit the breaking point on January 6, 2021. He nobly did
the right thing that day, but even when it comes to Trump’s effort to steal the
election—which torched America’s ability to boast about the peaceful transfer
of power—his tone has been more in sorrow than in anger.
Politicians are understandably reluctant to tell voters they’re wrong. But hinting at their wrongness isn’t very effective, either. It gets translated as deference to a high school bully and that’s disastrous for any candidate trying to seem like a leader.
No comments:
Post a Comment