By David Harsanyi
Wednesday, February 03, 2021
The other day, Karen Attiah, Global Opinions editor at
the Washington Post, one of the largest and most prestigious newspapers
in the world, reasoned
that “if America were another country, we would be talking about how post-Civil
War America is still in desperate need of a U.N.-sponsored Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) program for white supremacists and
segregationists.”
Well, perhaps “reasoned” is an overstatement. The idea,
of course, is as preposterous as it is juvenile, but more seriously, it betrays
a corrosive illiberalism and warped understanding of American life that’s
infected so much of the Left these days.
It’s alarming, to say the least, to see left-wing
punditry obsessed with limiting free expression — sometimes the speech of those
with genuinely reprehensible views, but often the speech of their political
foes, rationalized through collective guilt. Progressives have convinced
themselves, or pretend they have, that far-right extremism is rampant among
ordinary Americans. So much so, that if we weren’t weighed down by pesky
constitutional protections, we could use some international intervention
to straighten things out.
Of course, the chances of Slovakian or Peruvian special
forces — the U.N. has no standing army, after all — landing in Wyoming and
separating citizens accused of thought crimes from their AR-15s . . . let’s
just say, I’d put my money on Wyoming. Though perhaps Attiah envisions the
United Nations turning to more powerful nations such as China or Russia to
finish the job Abraham Lincoln started?
It should be noted that this brand of America-hating
make-believe sounds exactly like the conspiracies that anti-government
New World Order types believe people who run places like the Washington Post
editorial page are engaged in. Basically, every far-right extremist conspiracy
theory revolves around an international organization such as the United Nations
scheming to strip Americans of their freedoms and sovereignty. So good work.
We’ve gone from a country that papered over its past sins
to one where newspaper editors fantasize about putting the United Nations, an
organization teeming with tyrants, anti-Semites, racists, and terror states, in
charge of weeding out wrongthink. How can you take seriously someone who
believes the most pluralistic society yet invented, not to mention the most
stable republic in history, is no better than theocratic, tyrannical
pseudo-states such as the Central African Republic, the “Democratic” Republic
of the Congo, Mali, South Sudan, Burundi, Ethiopia, Haiti, Iraq, Libya,
Somalia, and Yemen, all of which, to one extent or another, are now under a
U.N.-sponsored Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration program?
“It says a lot about America that when I talk about
disarming violent white supremacists, white males in my mentions feel
personally attacked,” Attiah noted on
Twitter. I think it says more about the identitarianism of the contemporary
Left. “White males” — a massive group of human beings with a vast array of
experiences and ideas — feel attacked when spoken about as a kind of monolithic
group born in racial sin. Moreover, when the writer Chad Felix Greene pointed
out that Attiah doesn’t “see a difference between white males and white
supremacists,” she responded,
“If you’re not a white supremacist, the tweet doesn’t apply to you.”
Well, first of all, it doesn’t apply to anyone. White
supremacists and segregationists, even the real ones, have the same constitutional
protections as illiberal editors of global opinion sections at major
newspapers. If they act in a violent manner, or in any way illegally, they
should be prosecuted.
Second of all, who would decide such things? Is Ted Cruz
a white supremacist? Is Mitch McConnell? What
about the 70 million or so Donald Trump voters that Attiah claims “abet
racism and white supremacy?” Attiah believes
that Ben Shapiro, an Orthodox Jew with conventional right-center views,
empowers “white supremacy” merely by guest-writing a newsletter at Politico,
so you can imagine how expansive the definition of such a term would be when
the blue helmets roll in.
Attiah’s tweets regarding the U.N. accompanied an op-ed piece
headlined, “Guns are white supremacy’s deadliest weapon. We must disarm hate.”
Progressives are going to milk the Capitol riot for years, acting as if it were
a near democracy-destroying coup or junta rather than a rabble of violent and
seditious nuts. And they will treat every Republican as complicit in this act.
“Cleanse thyself!” they demand, so they can assign ownership to you, even if
you don’t share any of the ideas or goals of those who participated in the
madness that day.
Attiah and seemingly many other progressives believe that
we can simply divest citizens of their rights for holding unsightly views. But
such things would be possible only “if America were another country,” of
course.
No comments:
Post a Comment