By Isaac Schorr
Friday, February 26, 2021
Let the word go forth from this time and place: The
filibuster — that Jim Crow relic — is to blame for the progressive defeat in
the “Fight for $15.”
On Thursday evening, Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth
MacDonough ruled that Democrats could not raise the federal minimum wage to $15
an hour as part of their $1.9 trillion spending jubilee masquerading as a
COVID-relief measure, which they are trying to pass through the budget
reconciliation process. Reconciliation allows the Senate majority to sidestep
the filibuster and pass bills that affect spending, revenue, or the federal
debt ceiling. There are limits on how it can be used, though. One is that at
maximum, three bills can be passed a year using the mechanism. Another is the
Byrd Rule, which states that certain kinds of provisions are “extraneous” and
therefore cannot be passed under reconciliation. These include
those that:
1.
Do not produce a change in outlays or revenues
2.
Produce changes in outlays or revenue which are
merely incidental to the non-budgetary components of the provision
3.
Are outside the jurisdiction of the committee
that submitted the title or provision for inclusion in the reconciliation
measure
4.
Increase outlays or decrease revenue if the
provision’s title, as a whole, fails to achieve the Senate reporting
committee’s reconciliation instructions
5.
Increase net outlays or decrease revenue during
a fiscal year after the years covered by the reconciliation bill unless the
provision’s title, as a whole, remains budget neutral
6.
Contain recommendations regarding the OASDI
(social security) trust funds
It is the Byrd Rule that has compelled MacDonough to rule
the minimum-wage hike out of order. Remember, she’s no GOP hack; MacDonough was
appointed to her position back in 2012 by Harry Reid.
But MacDonough hasn’t been the focus of Democratic
criticism, even if she has been come under some fire for her decision. No, the
talking points have gone out, and they are aimed squarely at the filibuster.
Hawaii senator Brian Schatz tweeted
that:
The filibuster was never in the
constitution, originated mostly by accident, and has historically been used to
block civil rights. No legislatures on earth have a supermajority requirement
because that’s stupid and paralyzing. It’s time to trash the Jim Crow
filibuster.
Newly minted California senator Alex Padilla weighed
in with more pith, stating simply “End the filibuster. Raise the minimum
wage.”
Massachusetts’ delegation to the upper chamber chimed in
as well. Elizabeth Warren suggested
that “It’s long past time to get rid of the filibuster. We must remove Mitch
McConnell’s veto power over broadly popular policies the American people want
to see passed,” while Ed Markey recommitted
himself to “abolish[ing] the filibuster.” And that’s just a small sampling of
the emerging party line. The problem with this formulation is that it’s not
really the filibuster that’s holding back Senate Democrats from raising the minimum
wage to the arbitrary and ill-advised $15 mark — a goal inspired by the
aforementioned “Fight for $15” slogan.
That distinction belongs to Democrats Joe Manchin and
Kyrsten Sinema, both of whom oppose such a drastic increase and would have
stood in its way even if the filibuster were done away with and reconciliation
were rendered unnecessary. Moreover, Schatz, Warren, Markey, and the rest of
the Democrats were not just quieter about the apparently racist legislative
tool when they were in the minority, they were complicit in its use. Just last
September, they used it to kill a more discerning COVID-relief bill. The
calculated moral panic over the filibuster has nothing to do with the relief
package being pushed or the call to remedy racial injustice in America, and has
everything to do with the Democrats’ desire to slowly lay the groundwork for
pushing through even more controversial legislation if they expand their
majority in 2022.
The Democrats are outright lying about an important
counter-majoritarian institution that they used without remorse when it suited
them by tying it to America’s racial history. Worse yet, they’re doing so not
on principle, but in the pursuit of power.
No comments:
Post a Comment