Sunday, March 8, 2026

Washington’s Chance to Force Qatar and Iran’s Breakup

By Natalie Ecanow

Sunday, March 08, 2026

 

For years, Qatar has tried to dance at two weddings. America’s launch of Operation Epic Fury is forcing Doha to choose one.

 

Within the first 24 hours of the combined U.S.-Israel campaign that began on February 28, Iran fired 65 missiles and twelve drones at Qatar, according to the Qatari government. By March 1, Al Udeid Air Base, the largest American military installation in the region, was reportedly hit twice. Iran subsequently targeted Qatar’s energy infrastructure, prompting Doha to suspend liquefied natural gas (LNG) production. On March 2, Qatar said it shot down two Iranian jets. Qatari spokesman Majed al-Ansari told the press on March 3 that “there were attempts to attack Hamad International Airport” in Doha.

 

Rather than pressuring the United States to de-escalate, Iran’s attacks are driving a wedge between Qatar and the Islamic Republic. The United States now has an opening to push Doha and Tehran apart, further isolating the Iranian regime from its former friends.

 

Qatar has come under fire before, but its degree of diplomatic alignment with Washington is new. After the United States struck Iran’s nuclear program in June 2025, Iran retaliated by targeting Al Udeid Air Base. Qatar condemned the Iranian attack and “called for an immediate cessation of all military actions.” At the time, Doha was serving as a mediator in the ongoing Israel-Iran war and had expressed “grave concern” about the U.S. “attacks on the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran.”

 

Qatar’s expression of familial affection was not shocking. Doha spent the first several days of the June 2025 Israel-Iran war exploring ways to deepen its relationship with the Islamic Republic. Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani phoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on June 14 to discuss “ways to support and strengthen” bilateral relations. Days later, the emir received a letter from Pezeshkian about ways to “enhance” their “bilateral ties.”

 

The tone is dramatically different today. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi called Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed Abdulrahman Al Thani on March 4, and what followed was seemingly a heated exchange: the prime minister “categorically rejected” Araghchi’s claim that Iranian strikes only targeted “American interests” and accused Tehran of goading Gulf states “into a war ‘that’s not theirs.’” By Saturday, staff at the Iranian embassy in Doha reportedly received instructions to vacate Qatar within one week.

 

Qatar and Iran share the world’s largest natural gas field, which means their partnership is in part a function of geography. “Iran is my neighbor,” Sheikh Mohammed said last year. “I share with them the largest gas field in the world . . . and I have to deal with them.” But as my Foundation for Defense of Democracies colleague Saeed Ghasseminejad has written, their shared reservoir gives Qatar reason to lobby for the Islamic Republic’s survival. The regime’s incompetence leaves Qatar free to produce and profit from LNG exports without rival. Should the regime collapse and a new government take its place, Qatar could quickly find its energy dominance threatened.

 

Jockeying to keep the Islamic Republic afloat is one thing. Enabling the regime to go against the grain of U.S. policy is another. Qatar opposed the first Trump administration’s maximum pressure campaign and criticized Washington’s decision in 2019 to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization. Two years later, outgoing Israeli President Reuven Rivlin reportedly shared intelligence with the Biden administration indicating that Qatar had provided the IRGC with funding. Qatar later allowed the IRGC to showcase its arsenal at the 2024 Doha International Maritime Defense Exhibition. Among the technologies that the IRGC advertised were antiship cruise missiles like those that the Iran-backed Houthis fired at American vessels in the Red Sea.

 

A distinct sign that the war is creating fault lines between Qatar and Iran is the recent crackdown on IRGC operatives inside Qatar. Doha announced on March 3 that Qatari authorities dismantled two IRGC cells, arresting ten individuals allegedly “tasked with espionage missions” and “sabotage activities.” Of course, no government is expected to tolerate domestic threats. But Qatar’s move is noteworthy considering its prior ambivalence toward, if not financial support for, the IRGC, not to mention its long-standing tolerance for terrorist groups openly living and working on its soil.

 

The question is whether these fissures will widen or whether Qatar and Iran will patch their relationship once the fog of war clears. This is precisely the question that arose after Israel struck Hamas operatives in Doha in September 2025. Commentators rightly observed that Qatar “changed course” after landing in the crosshairs of the Israeli Air Force. After decades of support for Hamas and months of foot-dragging at the negotiating table, Qatar agreed to the Trump administration’s proposal for Gaza, turned the screws on Hamas, and a new hostage deal landed within weeks. Israeli jets created a rupture — the question was whether Qatar would decide that its strategy of playing both sides had run its course and maintain pressure on Hamas.

 

Whiffs of an answer emerged quickly. In October, Qatar’s emir accused Israel exclusively of violating the Gaza cease-fire. In December, al-Ansari suggested that Hamas shouldn’t fully disarm “under the thumb of occupation.” If the Israeli strike pushed Qatar to step back from Hamas, Doha’s retreat was short-lived.

 

The lesson is that cracks do not inevitably lead to tectonic shifts. Washington missed an opening to drive Qatar and Hamas apart. The Iran war has created a new opportunity for the United States to draw Qatar away not from an Iranian proxy, but from the Islamic Republic itself. It’s up to the Trump administration to seize the moment and drive a nail into the coffin of the Qatar-Iran relationship.

No comments: