Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Trump’s Muddled Messaging on the Iran War

By Jim Geraghty

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

 

I’m going to choose to be an optimist and believe that the contradictory statements from administration officials are a deliberate, brilliant strategy to ensure the remaining leaders in the Iranian regime have no idea what the U.S. actually wants to do or intends to do.

 

A post on X from the U.S. Department of Defense, 2:25 p.m. Eastern, Sunday afternoon: “We have only just begun to fight.”

 

President Trump, Monday afternoon, in an article on CBSNews.com posted at 4:58 p.m. Eastern:

 

“I think the war is very complete, pretty much,” the president said, speaking from his Doral, Florida, golf club.

 

“[Iran has] no navy, no communications, they’ve got no air force. Their missiles are down to a scatter. Their drones are being blown up all over the place, including their manufacturing of drones. . . . If you look, they have nothing left. There’s nothing left in a military sense. . . . We’re very far ahead of schedule.”

 

At 4:35 p.m. Eastern, Trump addressed House GOP members at their Issues Conference in Florida and said, “We’ve already won in many ways, but we haven’t won enough. We go forward more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long running danger once and for all. . . . We will not relent until the enemy is totally and decisively defeated.”

 

The term “totally and decisively defeated” sounds more like Trump’s Friday morning declaration on Truth Social that the only acceptable end to the war is Iran’s “unconditional surrender.” But later that day, the president told Axios, “Unconditional surrender could be that [the Iranians] announce it. But it could also be when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with.”

 

Shortly after the interview with CBS was published, President Trump held a press conference at Mar-a-Lago. There, he again made it sound like the military operations against Iran could wind down soon:

 

While we’re doing all of these things, we’re achieving major strides toward completing our military objective. And some people could say they’re pretty well complete. We’ve wiped every single force in Iran out, very completely. Most of Iran’s naval power has been sunk.

 

But a few moments later, the president added:

 

We’ve struck over 5,000 targets to date, some of them very major targets and we’ve left some of the most important targets for later in case we need to do it.

 

The president did not elaborate on why “some of the most important targets” have been “left for later.” When the president took questions, he said the war would end “very soon,” but not this week:

 

Q: Thank you, Mr. President. On Iran, you called it an excursion. You said it would be over soon. Are you thinking this week it will be over? Are you talking about days?

 

President Trump: No. But I think soon. Very soon. Look, everything they have is gone, including their leadership. In fact, there are two levels of leadership and even actually, as it turns out more than that, but two levels of leadership are gone. Most people have never even heard about the leaders that they’re talking about. So it’s obviously been very — very powerful, very effective.

 

But Trump said that if Iran kept up its attacks on ships in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, U.S. forces would hit Iran “at a much, much harder level”:

 

I will not allow a terrorist regime to hold the world hostage and attempt to stop the globe’s oil supply. And if Iran does anything to do that, they’ll get hit at a much, much harder level. . . . So, the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain safe. We have a lot of Navy ships there. We have the best equipment in the world, inspecting for mines. Again, most of their ships are down at the bottom of the sea, but we will, uh, we will hit them so hard that it will not be possible for them or anybody else helping them to ever recover that section of the world.

 

U.S. Central Command said that American forces have struck more than 5,000 targets in Iran since the war began, indisputably an incredible pace of sorties, and probably a near-unprecedented display of military might.

 

But the Iranian ability to strike targets in other countries remains degraded, not eliminated. From the Associated Press:

 

Sirens warned of incoming missiles in the futuristic business hub of Dubai, and in Bahrain, authorities said an Iranian attack hit a residential building in the capital, killing a 29-year-old woman and wounding eight others. Saudi Arabia said it destroyed two drones over its oil-rich eastern region and Kuwait’s National Guard said it shot down six drones.

 

Later in the morning, sirens also sounded in Jerusalem and sounds of explosions could be heard in Tel Aviv as Israel’s defense systems worked to intercept incoming fire, not long after the military said it detected an Iranian missile launch.

 

“We are definitely not looking for a ceasefire,” Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, wrote on X. “We believe that the aggressor should be punched in the mouth so that he learns a lesson so that he will never think of attacking our beloved Iran again.”

 

At another point in yesterday’s press conference, Trump emphasized how the U.S. military operation is benefiting China:

 

I mean, we’re doing this for the other parts of the world, including countries like China. They get a lot of their oil through the straits. So, we’re doing this. We have a very good relationship with President Xi and China. I’m going there in a short period of time. And we’re protecting the world from what these lunatics are trying to do, and very successfully, I might add.

 

So, just to clarify, the president who ran on “America first” and ending “forever wars,” and who once said “we can’t continue to allow China to rape our country,” is emphasizing how much his directed military intervention is helping protect Beijing’s access to oil.

 

As mentioned yesterday, at least a few Chinese ships — or at least ships claiming to be Chinese — have passed through the Strait of Hormuz unmolested since the conflict began:

 

But by claiming to have an “all-Chinese crew” aboard, or changing their destination to “Chinese owner”, vessels are linking themselves to Iran’s most important economic partner, Beijing.

 

“These appear to be precautionary signals used by ships attempting to reduce the risk of being targeted,” according to Ana Subasic, trade risk analyst at Kpler, which owns Marine Traffic.

 

That “does not always signal direct Chinese ownership,” she told AFP.

 

On Monday, Panama-flagged cargo ship Guan Yuan Fu Xing was the latest to make it safely through the Strait of Hormuz, two days after changing its destination to “CHINA OWNER” via its AIS transponder. . . .

 

The Iron Maiden, registered in the Marshall Islands, and the Liberia-flagged Sino Ocean, brandished China links while sailing through the strait, then removed them once they were out.

 

Others broadcast similar messages, sometimes for only a few minutes, while stationary.

 

At least two ships have broadcast signals indicating Turkish ownership and crew members, or in one case the day the war broke out, declaring itself “Muslim”.

 

But despite those efforts to identify as Chinese ships, very few ships are passing through the Strait of Hormuz, according to the maritime news site Windward:

 

Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz fell to its lowest level of the conflict, with only two outbound Iranian-flagged vessels recorded and no inbound crossings.

 

Evidence suggests that at least one tanker may have completed a dark transit through the Strait, reappearing after several days with AIS disabled.

 

Oil prices came down from the peak of their spike on Monday, leading some of the usual suspects to scoff that the concern about gas prices had been an overreaction from “panicans.” But the price per barrel of crude oil and Brent is still way higher than in mid-to-late February, as are heating oil and gasoline. (More on gas prices in a moment.)

 

Call it a panic if you want, but the people who make their living shipping and selling oil sure sound genuinely concerned:

 

The Iran war threatens “catastrophic consequences” for the global oil market, the CEO of Saudi oil giant Aramco has warned.

 

Amin Nasser told an earnings call on Tuesday that the war had caused “a severe chain reaction” and “a drastic domino effect” beyond shipping, “on aviation, agriculture, automotive, and other industries.”

 

“There will be catastrophic consequences for the world’s oil market. The longer the disruption goes on and the more drastic the consequences for the global economy,” he said, adding that it was “by far the biggest crisis” faced by the region’s oil and gas industry.

 

Aramco’s Ras Tanura refinery was hit by a projectile last week, amid widespread Iranian drone and missile attacks on the Gulf states in response to U.S. and Israeli strikes on it.

 

Esmail Baghaei, spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry, appeared on CNBC International yesterday:

 

As long as the situation is insecure, I think all tankers, all maritime navigation must be very careful. Again, this doesn’t mean that we want to harm the tankers, we want to target the tankers, not. The situation is because of the aggressions by the United States and Israel. . . .

 

As I said, we are not responsible for this situation. Come on. Did we start this war? Don’t you agree with me that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz is all because of this war? And if you agree with me, this war was not started by Iran. They started this war. The United States and Israel and all those countries that are helping the aggressors through giving them territory, giving them logistics, giving them their assets and installations.

 

If you’re looking to measure the political fallout, I would keep my eyes on the prices at the local gas station. Yesterday morning, the average national price according to AAA was $3.47; this morning, it is $3.53.

No comments: