National
Review Online
Thursday,
October 05, 2023
No one on
the right had high expectations for California governor Gavin Newsom’s
selection of the replacement for Senator Dianne Feinstein. The selection was
inevitably going to be a progressive Democrat, and was likely to bring to the
chamber some combination of the eloquence of Kamala Harris, the bipartisan
goodwill of Barbara Boxer, the sparkling personality of Gray Davis, and the
fresh face of Nancy Pelosi.
But
somehow Newsom managed to dive below the low expectations and make a hash of
things every step of the way.
Back in March
2021, when
Feinstein was still insisting she intended to finish her term, Newsom pledged
to select a black woman to replace her someday, making clear that his top
requirements for the selection were skin color and gender. Even some of
Newsom’s usual allies found this pandering ham-fisted, and more than a
little insulting to Feinstein, just short of talking about her in past tense.
Then
this September, Newsom promised that the person he selected would be an interim
appointment and that the appointed senator would not run for a full term. “I
don’t want to get involved in the primary,” Newsom told
Chuck Todd on Meet the Press. “It would be completely unfair to the
Democrats that have worked their tail off. That primary is just a matter of
months away. I don’t want to tip the balance of that.”
But one
of the three top Democrats running for the seat in 2024, Representative
Barbara Lee, objected:
“I am troubled by the governor’s remarks. The idea that a black woman should be
appointed only as a caretaker to simply check a box is insulting to countless
black women across this country who have carried the Democratic Party to
victory election after election.”
That
warning of his “insulting” stance must have made the governor nervous. A few
days ago, Newsom backed away from his previous stance. His spokesman Anthony
York told the Los
Angeles Times,
“If that person decides she wants to seek a full term in 2024, then she is free
to do so. There is absolutely no litmus test, no promise.”
This
weekend, Newsom announced he was picking Laphonza Butler, president of the
national organization EMILY’s List, an organization that aims to elect
Democratic women who support taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.
Newsom’s
selection is almost a parody of a pandering politician; instead of merely
attempting to placate or satisfy a key Democratic Party interest group, he’s
putting the head of a key Democratic Party interest group in the Senate. Still,
give Newsom credit for perhaps the lone example of government efficiency in his
reign. No more need for the middlemen of Democratic politicians; EMILY’s List
now gets its own Senate seat directly.
Conservatives
dreaded that Newsom would fill the seat with just another California
progressive. Ironically, Butler is not really a California progressive.
She has
lived in Silver Spring, Md., for at least the past two years and registered to
vote in California only this week. As the perfectly absurd headline at
the Maryland-based Daily
Record put
it, “California governor names Maryland resident Laphonza Butler to Feinstein
Senate seat.” It’s more than a little ironic that, after years of Democrats
complaining that California is
underrepresented in the U.S. Senate, Newsom chose to effectively give Maryland a
third senator.
But as
our John Fund
explained, if you
see the process of governing as simply a matter of pleasing Democratic interest
groups, Newsom hit a grand slam. His press release emphasized that Butler is a
“black lesbian,” used to be president of the California Service Employees
International Union, and, of course, was the president of EMILY’s List.
I mean,
sure, the overwhelming majority of the Californians she’s going to represent
have never heard of her, and she’s not really a Californian, but details,
details. Her swearing-in was a great day for Maryland.
With one
swift stroke, Newsom has ensured that the activist groups of the Left shall
have a new birth of influence, and that government of the progressive
lobbyists, by the progressive lobbyists, and for the progressive lobbyists
shall not perish from the earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment