National Review Online
Wednesday, May 12, 2021
This week, well over 1,000 rockets have been launched
into Israel by Palestinian terrorists operating out of Gaza. The rockets
have been aimed at schools, at Israeli civilians in the highly populated Tel
Aviv area, and — in a major escalation — at Ben Gurion Airport, which connects
Israel with the outside world.
Due to the incredible performance of its Iron Dome
missile-defense system, Israel has been able to minimize its casualties. But
because no system is perfect, and with Hamas and Islamic Jihad launching
hundreds of missiles simultaneously, some have managed to slip through, doing
damage to property and killing several Israelis, including a father and
daughter in the city of Lod and a five-year-old boy in Sderot.
Understandably, Israel has responded with air strikes
targeting terrorists in Gaza and their infrastructure. Israelis go to great
lengths to minimize civilian casualties. They have notified Gazans of impending
attacks and have employed the practice of “roof knocking,” whereby they drop
nonexplosive devices on buildings to alert residents that it is about to be
targeted by an air strike so they have time to vacate.
The terrorist groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad routinely
fire and store rockets in civilian areas. This tactic has naturally put more
Palestinians in harm’s way. Indeed, this is part of the strategy, as civilian
casualties in Gaza help the groups to gain support among the international
community, and on the American left.
The latest wave of rocket attacks came after escalating
Palestinian riots in Jerusalem, which related to two separate issues, both of
which have been completely distorted by the media.
One involves a legal dispute over several properties in
Sheikh Jarrah, where Palestinian tenants with expired leases (or no leases at
all) have been living. Israel’s lower court has ruled that Jewish owners had
valid title to these properties, in which Jews lived prior to being driven out
by Jordan during the 1948 war. The dispute, which is set to go before Israel’s
supreme court, was one trigger for recent rioting by Palestinians.
The other trigger was COVID-19 restrictions that
prohibited Muslims from visiting Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem during Ramadan.
When the restrictions were announced, the Jordanian Muslim council overseeing
the Islamic sites said the move was “painful” but that it was “in line
with legal fatwas and medical advice.” The clerics advised that Muslims should
“perform prayers in their homes during the month of Ramadan, to preserve their
safety.” One could argue about whether COVID-19 considerations should be put
aside in this case, but they are consistent with many restrictions that people
throughout the world have had to put up with over the course of the pandemic.
Yet this issue combined with the Sheikh Jarrah dispute
and led to massive rioting around Jerusalem, with Palestinians throwing rocks
and launching fireworks at Jews praying at the Western Wall. Al Aqsa itself
ended up being used not for praying, but as a storage depot for other rocks and
weapons to be used in clashes with Israeli police.
Hamas, publicly egged on by its sponsor Iran (including
on Twitter), decided to exploit this opportunity to begin its barrage of rocket
attacks.
It is worth noting that while these may have been the
triggers of the most recent wave of violence, they do not explain everything.
At any given time, there are always incidents that Iranian-backed Palestinian
terrorists could use as an excuse to launch missiles at Israel. Why has this
resulted in the most ferocious barrage since 2014?
One good guess is the occupant in the White House.
For four years, Israel had a reliable ally in the White
House. Donald Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, recognized Israeli
sovereignty in the Golan Heights, made it clear that the U.S. supported
Israel’s right to self-defense, and cut aid to the Palestinians that has been
traditionally used to incite terrorism. He also recognized that Iran was a
significant threat, and ratcheted up sanctions as part of a “maximum pressure”
campaign. While Democrats howled that these actions would set the region in
flames, it actually led to historic peace deals between Israel and Arab states.
Biden has sent the actual opposite signals. He restored
the incitement money to the Palestinians to signal closer ties and at the same
time has shown a desperation to return to the disastrous Iran deal. His
administration has signaled a willingness to even lift sanctions aimed at its
sponsorship of terrorism.
Against this backdrop, it is no surprise that
Palestinians have felt emboldened to step up attacks against Israel, and that
Iran has been so ready to call on its proxies to carry out these attacks.
During the Obama administration, the race to sign on to a nuclear deal meant
that the U.S. ignored Iran’s malign influence on the rest of the region, and
the terrorist regime has every reason to believe that the same would be the
case with Biden.
For days, as violence escalated, Biden hid behind lazy
both-sides language in statements conveyed through his press team before
finally acknowledging in person on Wednesday afternoon, in response to a
reporter’s question, that “Israel has a right to defend itself when you have
thousands of rockets flying into your territory.” This was a welcome
development, but if Biden seeks to change the dynamic in the Middle East, he
needs to more emphatically convey to Iran and its terrorist proxies that they
will get nowhere through targeting innocent civilians.
No comments:
Post a Comment