By Kevin D.
Williamson
Tuesday, May 04,
20221
Mike Wood has done harder things than
running for the House of Representatives, and some of those hard things he did
in Afghanistan, where he won two Purple Hearts and a Navy Commendation Medal —
which made it especially irritating for him to listen to fellow Republicans
describe him as a “traitor” during his recent campaign in Texas’s 6th District.
Wood has a direct, unadorned way of communicating (one section of his campaign
bio begins, “After getting shot . . .”), a refreshingly stoic style in our age
of hysterical politics. Emotionally incontinent displays are not his thing, but
there is some tension in his voice when he sets that scene.
“Not a whole lot gets to me, but when some
of these nut-jobs called me a ‘traitor,’ it got to me more than it should. I
have scars on all four limbs from fighting for this country, but — because I
refused to bend the knee to Donald Trump — I’m some sort of Benedict Arnold character.
But that’s where our politics are right now.” Hearing about the Utah GOP’s
treatment of Mitt Romney — the senator was denounced as a “traitor” and, of all
things, a “communist” — Wood saw it as more of the same: “Disgusting.”
Wood, whom I first met when he was a
National Review Institute Regional Fellow in Dallas, is the sort of
candidate conservatives used to dream about: under 40, a decorated veteran,
articulate, educated (bachelor’s from NYU and an MBA from SMU), a business
owner with a big, photogenic family, he had everything going for him with the
exception of one thing: apostasy.
Wood is one of a surprisingly large number
of conservatives who opposed Trump in 2016 but supported him — voted for him,
anyway, with whatever other qualifications or hesitation — in 2020. But he also
has been plainspoken about the Trump movement, which he accurately describes as
a “cult of personality” in thrall to loopy conspiracy theories. It was Trump’s
post-election performance leading up to the events of January 6 that most
troubles Wood, who calls Trump’s conduct “disqualifying.”
Some very wise political insiders in Texas
advised Wood to tamp down the anti-Trump rhetoric, on the theory that while the
GOP may be — may be — ready for post-Trump leadership, it is
not ready for anti-Trump leadership. And those voices of caution
probably were right as a matter of pure political calculation — Wood came in
fifth among Republicans and ninth overall in the 23-candidate, bipartisan
goat-rodeo of an election — but there is more to life, and more to political
life, than calculation.
“I want to serve in elected office,” he
says, “but I don’t want to go to Congress if that means I have to act like
Madison Cawthorn or Lindsey Graham. If the cost of entry into Republican politics
is that you have to pretend to buy into lies, then I don’t want to do that.”
Wood’s anti-Trump stance won him national
media attention and the endorsement of the Dallas Morning News, but
it did not win him a lot of support in the Republican rank-and-file. After the
election, noted QAnon kook Marjorie Taylor Greene ridiculed Wood and
Representative Adam Kinzinger, one of his political allies. The nice lady who
thinks that California wildfires are caused by Jewish space lasers wrote that
Wood and his backers are “clueless about what Republican voters think and feel”
and that what Republicans demand is “America First and loyalty to Trump.” And,
as strange as it is to write, the nice lady who thinks that California
wildfires are caused by Jewish space lasers is almost correct: Wood is far from
“clueless” about the Republican demand for “loyalty to Trump” — he is keenly
aware of what Republican voters think and feel, but he believes that these
thoughts and feelings are grounded in falsehood and paranoia that ultimately
will destroy the Republican Party and do great damage to the country itself.
And, to the detriment of his electoral prospects, he says so.
The race in the 6th will be resolved in a
runoff, and the candidate expected to win is a Trump-endorsed member of the
State Republican Executive Committee (Drain
that swamp!) whose main claim to the seat is that she is the widow of
the man who most recently held it.
It is a sign of the Republican times that
the standout moment from Wood’s campaign was a confrontational talk-radio
interview. DFW-area right-wing radio host Mark Davis, a presumably smart guy
who hosts a multidimensionally moronic radio program, complained that Wood’s
assertions about the facts of the presidential election were
“condescending” in that they did not match up with how many members of his
audience “feel.” Wood, exasperated, said: “This is one of the worst parts of
what Trump has done to the Right — he’s turned us into a bunch of whiny little
lefties. It’s all about ‘feelings.’ It’s all about ‘Well, you’ve got your
truth, I’ve got my truth.’ ”
Davis, obviously caught off guard, fumbled
around for a bit and then declared the exchange “wonderful radio.”
But it wasn’t wonderful radio — it
was idiotic radio elevated only by the fact that one of the
parties in the conversation understood it to be idiotic and had the guts to say
so. It was also a textbook illustration of what ails the entertainment wing of
the Republican Party at this unfortunate moment in time: cowardice. Davis and
his kind are plainly terrified of their audiences and afraid to say anything
that might make them uncomfortable, even if that means going along with B.S. so
unmistakable that you can practically smell it through the radio.
One of William F. Buckley Jr.’s great escapades
was his doomed 1965 campaign for mayor of New York City. He knew he wasn’t
going to win. (“What is the first thing you will do if you win?” a reporter
asked. “Demand a recount,” he answered, maybe the most famous bon mot in his
extensive catalog.) But getting elected mayor wasn’t the point. There are those
who can understand what the point was and those who can’t. The same is true of
Mike Wood’s eight weeks as a politician. Let him with eyes see.
It is not clear to me that such a man as
Mike Wood has a future in the Republican Party. If he doesn’t, then that is
going to be a lot less of a problem for him than it is for the GOP.
No comments:
Post a Comment