By Isaac Schorr
Thursday, May 20, 2021
At National Review Institute’s Ideas Summit on Thursday, Secretary Betsy DeVos
defended her record at the Department of Education while critiquing her
successors in the Biden administration.
In a wide-ranging discussion with National Review editor-in-chief
Rich Lowry — who called her a “courageous, principled, and effective public
servant” — DeVos touched on a number of subjects including school closures,
Title IX, critical race theory, and student debt.
Diagnosing why so many schools remained closed during the
pandemic even while the research and experience of other countries made it
clear they were not a significant driver of transmission was easy for DeVos:
“It all falls at the feet of the teachers’ unions and all of their allies.”
Castigating them as “defenders of the status quo,” DeVos
identified these groups’ motivations as “money, resources, and control.” As an
example, she pointed to teachers in Los Angeles refusing to go back to work
until unrelated (and far-fetched) progressive political priorities such as
police abolition were achieved. She also argued that closures have made
educational disparities worse, as low-income students have fewer options when
they’re forced into a subpar virtual education.
On a brighter note, DeVos believes that Americans are
waking up to the deleterious impact teachers’ unions have on the educational
system and think the unions are nervous, citing American Federation of Teachers
president Randi Weingarten’s “circling back” and pretending that she is and
always was for reopening.
“Too little, too late,” said DeVos, who touted the fact
that ten states have started or expanded school-choice programs in the first
half of 2021.
Critical race theory and the 1619 Project were also
targets. The Biden administration’s push to include these ideas and materials
in curricula across the country is “very disturbing,” according to DeVos. “This
last year has revealed to a lot of families across the country what their kids
have actually ben taught,” she observed, suggesting that engagement on the
local level will be imperative to pushing back.
Lowry deemed DeVos’s reforms to Department of Education
guidance relating to Title IX of the Civil Rights Act perhaps the most notable
accomplishment of her tenure as secretary. DeVos concurred, calling them
“hugely important.” “We knew this was going to be something that was tough, but
necessary” she explained, panning the Obama administration’s discarding of
due-process rights for those accused of sexual assault on college campuses as
“insidious.”
The Biden administration is trying to roll back DeVos’s
reforms, but because she went through the proper administrative rule-making
process, she doubts that it will be successful.
Expressing her disagreement with the Biden
administration’s support for “free” college, DeVos described America’s public
K-12 education system as “at best . . . middling” and submitted that to make
higher education more like it would be to hinder innovation in the industry.
“Two out of three people in this country haven’t gone to
a four-year college or university,” she reminded the audience, urging them to
consider that there are “lots of good opportunities that don’t require a
traditional four-year” degree program. She called subsidizing the wealthiest
and most privileged third of society “fundamentally wrong.”
As for solutions to the growing student debt problem,
DeVos proposed less-stringent accreditation standards to drive competition and
provide students with more options. She also spoke to the importance of keeping
them informed and ensuring they understand the costs of college as well as how
much the average graduate from every program earns.
Asked how she dealt with the flood of vitriolic attacks
against her, DeVos shrugged.
“To be very honest, it did not bother me personally at
all,” she responded, going on to say she was “very comfortable” knowing she was
doing her best for students across the country.
“K-12 education is the least disrupted industry in our
nation, and it must be disrupted for the future of our country and for the
future of individual kids.”
No comments:
Post a Comment