By Noah Rothman
Friday, May 28, 2021
It doesn’t take much to establish and enforce a consensus
around a pearl of conventional wisdom these days, and we have been woefully underserved as a result. Today, another
critically unexamined but fashionable opinion is upon us. It is leading the
Biden administration toward the vigorous execution of one of its chief policy
priorities: That is the idea that Americans want out of Afghanistan, and they
want it yesterday. They don’t care how we get to that preferred outcome; they
just want out. And they’re willing to absorb any costs along the way.
In April, Joe Biden announced his intention to seek the
withdrawal of all U.S. and NATO forces from Afghanistan by an auspicious date,
September 11, 2021. Withdrawal would be entirely unconditional, independent of
the conditions on the ground. American military commanders objected. A pullout that dramatic would
risk U.S. gains and force local interests to accommodate the Taliban as it
seeks a return to power. But Biden held firm. This month, the president
accelerated the timetable for withdrawal. All American troops are now on track
to leave this Central Asian nation no later than mid-July.
But the Pentagon was right to worry. As the New York Times reported, since U.S. forces began
their withdrawal, the Taliban has filled the vacuum that’s been left behind.
Since May 1, at least 26 outposts in four Afghan provinces have surrendered to
fundamentalist insurgents, taking government forces hostage and securing
critical intelligence along the way.
The restoration of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
seems a foregone conclusion now. America’s allies are shutting down their diplomatic missions in Kabul, and
the Afghans credulous enough to trust America’s commitment to their safety
are scrambling to get out before the old guard returns to
kill them. Administration officials still have no clear idea how to prevent
Afghanistan from once again incubating the kind of terrorists that attacked the
U.S. 20 years ago, or even whether the U.S. will provide air support for the
Afghan forces still capable of fending off the Taliban.
Make no mistake, this is an American defeat. But the
unduly self-confident arbiters of America’s political discourse are convinced
that the voting public will be just fine with it.
Americans are exhausted from the Afghanistan
conflict, the polls suggest, even if they’re not following the
situation all that closely. Many–Democrats, primarily–are convinced that the
conflict had been a costly error from the start, and few could tell you what
has really been accomplished by our presence there. At least, that’s how those
who favor withdrawal justify their own predilections.
But those polls could be misleading. As Brookings’
researchers, Madiha Afzal and Israa Saber, recently observed, fewer and fewer
Americans even respond to questions involving the troop presence in
Afghanistan. “In previous polls, one conducted by the University of Maryland in
October 2019 and the other by YouGov in 2018, approximately one-fifth of
respondents opted not to answer questions about troop levels in
Afghanistan,” they noted.
And those who do choose to weigh in on the matter are
more ambivalent about it all than you might think. In 2019, one poll found that only one-third of Americans backed
“a rapid and orderly withdrawal of all troops from Afghanistan.” Last fall,
another poll found that just 34 percent supported troop withdrawals, as long
as they were buttressed by a counterterrorism agreement with the Taliban (which
has since failed to materialize).
Sure, public opinion may be more ambivalent than you’ve
been led to believe. But the time has come to get out, with or without public
support, right? The blood and treasure invested in Afghanistan over 20 years
are more than enough, a familiar refrain contends. But the public’s growing
ambivalence toward the conflict reflects the declining costs associated with
America’s advisory commitment to Afghan security.
Since 2001, the number of U.S. deaths in Afghanistan
totals just over 2,300, with about 20,000 soldiers wounded. Combat-related
casualties suffered by the tiny 2,500-solider U.S. footprint in Afghanistan are
relatively rare today. And as for treasure, U.S. military operations over the
20 years we’ve spent in Afghanistan total roughly $825 billion. Not exactly
small change, but the federal government today talks about spending $1 trillion
over the course of a weekend like it’s nothing, much less 20 years–and on
projects with prospects for success not nearly as defined as the West’s mission
in Afghanistan.
Ultimately, what keeps those invested in American
geopolitical hegemony and domestic security up at night is the prospect that we
won’t be gone from Afghanistan for long. We’ll be back, at a time and place not
of our choosing, when it once again becomes a terrorist haven. After all,
that’s what happened in Iraq in 2014, the last time Washington deemphasized
strategic goals in favor of political narratives. “We’ve seen this movie
before,” said Defense Sec. Lloyd Austin. And we know how it
ends.
Those who refuse to question their own certainty about
how the future will unfold don’t seem all that concerned about the political
fallout that will settle over the American landscape following our capitulation
in Afghanistan. They seem to think voters are in the mood to be defeated. They
have not considered the potentially far-reaching psychological effects that may
follow from watching the collapse of everything Americans spent a generation
working toward in Central Asia. They don’t believe there will be any repercussions
when the Taliban forces women and girls back into the shadows, tortures the
Afghans who worked with American forces but couldn’t get out in time, and
overruns American outposts and diplomatic missions. They don’t think anyone
will care when the instruments of American power are foisted over the shoulders
of jihadists as trophies—forcing us to confront the symbols of America’s
inexorable decline.
And maybe they’re right. But what if they’re wrong?
No comments:
Post a Comment