By Matthew Continetti
Friday, April 2024
News broke Thursday evening of an Israeli strike inside Iran. In doing so, Israeli prime
minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the advice President Biden had given him
after Iran’s April 13 drone and missile attack on the Jewish state. At the
time, Biden told Netanyahu not to escalate. “You got a win,” Biden said to Bibi. “Take the win.”
Israel demurred. And was absolutely right
to. Whatever happens next, it is worth reflecting on the idiocy of Biden’s
comments.
Not only do Biden’s words capture the mindset responsible
for the chaos that has engulfed the world during his presidency. His comments
also raise the question of what a “win” against Iran would really look like —
and why America has not pursued that goal.
Yes, the technical and operational mastery of the
U.S.-led coalition was stunning. America, Israel, the United Kingdom, France,
and most significantly Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates
intercepted 99 percent of the weapons that Iran launched to kill Jews. Arab
pilots shooting down drones aimed at Israel is not something we have seen
before. The damage inside Israel was minimal. A severely injured Arab Israeli
girl, age seven, was the sole casualty. Ayatollah Khamenei and his goons look monstrous,
craven, inept, and isolated. Some of us knew that already.
Preventing loss is not a gain, however. A successful
defense is not a win. If you prevent the opposing team from scoring any points
but have no offense, the match does not end in a triumph. It ends in a tie. Or
consider a more violent analogy: Say you are shot while wearing a Kevlar vest.
The body armor may shield you from the bullet. What it can’t do is disarm and
disable your assailant.
President Biden holds a different view. He subscribes to
the idea that if you parry enough blows, eventually the man who is pummeling
you will recognize the error of his ways and move on. He believes that a
combination of economic penalties and shaming or embarrassing or chastising
rogue regimes in the fictional court of international public opinion will lead
to peace.
He is wrong. Biden’s reluctance to unleash our allies —
what the press calls his fear of escalation — has produced the disaster in
Afghanistan, the slow-motion advance of Russia in Ukraine, the standstill in
Gaza, and a Greater Middle East where Hezbollah, Iranian proxies in Syria and
Iraq, and the Houthis do as they please. And there are eight months left in his
term.
In statecraft, defense without retaliation is exceedingly
dangerous. It leads to a false sense of security. It emboldens the aggressor.
This isn’t academic international-relations theory. This is Hamas 2024.
For over a decade, Israel believed it could disengage
from the Gaza Strip by relying on its layered missile defenses and periodic
“mowing the grass” air campaigns to degrade terrorist capabilities. The
two-pronged strategy would hold Hamas in check. The promise of economic
integration, with Palestinian workers crossing from Gaza into Israel, might
even promote reform within the Strip.
Such was the logic behind the “Conceptzia” that governed Israeli policy toward Hamas.
The Conceptzia died on October 7. Land-based missile
defenses such as the Iron Dome and David’s Sling are remarkably effective. They
have saved lives. But they haven’t changed the nature, aims, and objectives of
Hamas. They changed its tactics.
To protect its personnel and weapons from the Israeli air
force, Hamas built a submerged state of tunnels and spider holes. Meanwhile,
Hamas’s leadership planned the surprise land, air, and sea attack that killed
1,300 Israelis, wounded thousands, and took hundreds captive.
You can shield your population from harm, but threats
will remain until the source of the attacks is neutralized. That was the lesson
of October 7. It should be the takeaway from April 13.
If Iran’s attack had gone unanswered, a new precedent
would be set in the region. Fire whatever you want toward Israel, and so long
as we intercept the projectiles, you won’t pay a big price. Such an outcome
would be a disaster. No sovereign state should be forced to accept such
vulnerability. Yet that is precisely what will happen if Israel takes the “win”
as President Biden suggests.
A real win would reestablish deterrence against Israel’s
and America’s enemies. It would make Iran think twice before launching any more
drones in Israel’s direction. And the way to reestablish deterrence is to
ignore the arms of the octopus and go straight for its head.
Take away something Iran’s leaders hold dear — their
nuclear program. By destroying Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, you not only
exact a heavy cost for the regime’s malign behavior. You guarantee Israel’s
security.
After all, why did America come to Israel’s defense but
not to Ukraine’s? Both nations are under assault. The difference is Israel’s
assailant has no nuclear weapons. Ukraine’s enemy has thousands.
Would America coordinate a similar operation to defend
Israel if Iran had nukes? Maybe a future president would do that. This
president would not.
I understand Netanyahu’s position. A superpower is not
easily dismissed. Especially when that superpower — despite counterproductive
rhetoric and diplomatic incoherence — continues to deliver unconditional
military aid for operations against Hamas. Especially when that superpower
helped Israel fend off the Iranian attack. Israel wants to keep America on its
side, where America belongs.
Yet lines must be drawn. Leaving Iran to fight another
day, and leaving Hamas intact in Rafah, weaken the state of Israel and diminish
the future of the Jewish people. Talk all you want, Mr. President. But if you
call this a win, God help us if we lose.
No comments:
Post a Comment