By Noah Rothman
Wednesday, April 17, 2024
You’re likely to hear a lot about the polls showing that
Americans are growing impatient with Israel. Democrats and their media allies
seem to have concluded that this sentiment will grow along a straight-line
trajectory until a majority have become intractably hostile toward Israel’s
defensive war against Hamas. But straight-line trajectories are inherently
fallacious. They take no account of exogenous events, such as, for example,
Iran’s brazen, multilayered missile and drone attack on Israeli population centers. Indeed, even
before that attack, Democratic and media elites had already internalized a
misreading of this war and voters’ perceptions of it.
For example, a Pew Research Center poll from late March showed that, while the public is
growing weary of watching Israel zealously prosecute its right to self-defense,
those same voters also understand that Israel’s casus belli is just while
Hamas’s is not. That survey found that only 15 percent of respondents believe
that Israel’s reasons for fighting Hamas are “not at all” or “not too” valid.
By contrast, 49 percent of respondents don’t believe that Hamas’s aims or cause
are valid. Although 34 percent said Israel’s conduct on the ground in Gaza is
“completely” or “somewhat” unacceptable, the October 7 massacre that begat this
war was seen as an “acceptable” response to Israel’s actions by precisely 4
percent of American adults. Nearly three-quarters of the Americans surveyed
rejected the notion that the barbarity unleashed on 10/7 was a legitimate
response to the conditions that prevailed in the Gaza Strip.
This dichotomy is something on which America’s
center-left elites should reflect amid their ongoing efforts to coddle and
mollify what can only be described as a pro-terrorism
constituency. That description will surely rankle Israel’s critics, but
what else are you supposed to call a protest movement that burns the American
flag while flying Hezbollah’s banner high? How else should we regard
demonstrators who adorn themselves with keffiyehs and “Hamas-style headbands”? Terrorist groups such as Hamas kill
Americans. What are we to conclude about the intentions of those who praise and
mimic them?
Do the demonstrators who block major thoroughfares, bridges, and airports,
thereby frustrating attempts to address medical emergencies and even risking
the prospect of a disaster on a flight takeoff, only want to be heard by their
elected officials? Or are their intentions far darker than that? Are we to
believe that, when these malcontents chant “Death to America,” what they really mean is that Congress
and the president should recalibrate America’s posture toward Israel to strike
a finer balance between human-rights concerns and the West’s security
priorities in the Middle East? Of course not. When they chant “Death to
America,” they mean “Death to America.”
Whose constituency is this? To its credit, the Biden
campaign has distanced itself, albeit gingerly, from the antics of the
anti-American left. But it remains beholden to a theory of the 2024 campaign
that ensures it can only back away so much lest it sacrifice the crucial State
of Michigan and, with it, the White House. His party, meanwhile, plays host to
federal elected officials who bend over backward to popularize the
slogans that reliably precede the murder of Jews. When it placates this wholly
unsympathetic and objectively marginal constituency, does the Democratic Party
expect the rest of us not to notice?
It’s simply not good enough for Biden and his fellow
Democrats to gently chide the anti-American left and move on. Throw them under
the bus. Pick one — any will do, as this is a target-rich environment — and
make an example of him or her. Democrats are clearly afraid of how America’s
restive students would react to that sort of banal majoritarianism. Whatever
backlash that effort engenders among the young, indolent, and miseducated —
however violent and disruptive it may be — will not come back on the Democrats
who were bold enough to express their affection for the United States.
Indeed, such an outcome might even redound to Democrats’
benefit, even if it risks furthering the sense that the party’s governing style
invites the chaos and lawlessness that Biden’s presidency was supposed to
remedy. This anti-American cohort has made it its intention to physically attack the symbols of Democratic governance. It’s high
time the president and his allies summon the courage to defend themselves. In
doing so, they might convince their dispirited supporters that the president’s
party is not a spent force bereft of self-confidence and a healthy sense of
patriotism. The alternative is to allow the provocateurs and agitators in
America’s streets to set the terms of the debate and dictate the tempo of
events. To allow that to continue is politically suicidal.
No comments:
Post a Comment