By Jeffrey Blehar
Tuesday, April 16, 2024
I imagine I’m in a distinct minority of National Review writers and readers
when I confess that I actually listen to National Public Radio on a
semi-regular basis. (I know of one other offender on staff, whose identity I
shall guard fiercely as a matter of personal honor.) What can I say? Maybe I
secretly enjoy having howlingly biased neutral-voiced progressives condescend
to me. Or maybe it’s because NPR’s truly comedic plunge into rote progressive
cant — from its already very liberal starting point — has been an endless
source for column ideas, as well as a handy whetstone against which I can
sharpen my sarcasm into a razor while stuck in traffic.
So it was with immense interest that I read a piece last week in Bari Weiss’s fine dissident
center-left outlet the Free Press by Uri Berliner, current —
as in, very much not former — senior business editor at NPR.
Titled “I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years — Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust,”
the essay is a damning and heartily recommended insider account of how NPR, an
organization already long-famed for catering to the sensibilities and political
tastes of upper-middle-class white progressives, truly ran off the rails during
the Trump years (and particularly post–George Floyd) into hard ideological
dogmatism.
When I read it, I had two reactions, one to the text and
one to the subtext. The text of Berliner’s piece was of course an eloquent and
sensitively written exposé of the accelerating editorial rot behind the scenes
at NPR. Berliner’s argument is not about bias — NPR’s liberal tilt is
structurally unavoidable given the kind of people who want to work there — as
much as it is about the complete internal corruption of journalistic ethics.
(To wit, his discussion of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal is the ultimate
confirmation of priors for suspicious conservatives: “I listened as one of
NPR’s best and most fair-minded journalists said it was good we weren’t
following the laptop story because it could help Trump.”)
The subtext of the piece, however, was
clear: “Now that I’ve aired our dirty laundry, I dare you to fire me before I
eventually resign.” This was, for all its eloquence, functionally a
career-terminating act. The various official responses from NPR, including a
defensive rebuttal from NPR’s standards & practices editor and a five-day suspension without pay for “freelancing
without permission,” indicate clearly that he is now persona non grata.
To be fair, Berliner either certainly expected this or should have. As Phoebe
Maltz Bovy aptly asks, “How many jobs are there where you could write
a big essay about your beef with your workplace and keep your job?” Berliner
was clearly dismayed enough about the situation at NPR that he was prepared to
leave, and since as an NPR liberal he is more genteel than Homer Simpson, he
chose to burn his bridges publicly and rhetorically, rather than literally.
And perhaps do something else as well. For I could not
help noticing one other thing about the piece as I read it last week, something
that immediately leapt out to me and which has made subsequent events feel like
they’re playing out entirely predictably: the final paragraph.
A few weeks ago, NPR welcomed a
new CEO, Katherine Maher, who’s been a leader in tech. She doesn’t have a news
background, which could be an asset given where things stand. I’ll be rooting
for her. It’s a tough job. Her first rule could be simple enough: don’t tell
people how to think. It could even be the new North Star.
In a profession where journalists and pundits read these
sorts of big dishy insider pieces differently than normal folks do — searching
for hidden implications, listening for dog whistles, and frankly sometimes
wearing tinfoil hats — that paragraph instantly sounded a blaring klaxon.
“PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THIS INCOMING BOSS WHO I WILL MENTION BY NAME AND WHO I
MIGHT ADD LACKS ANY JOURNALISTIC BACKGROUND WHATSOEVER.”
And, mother of God, look what turned up once people like Christopher Rufo did just that. You see,
it turns out that Katherine Maher is no ordinary ascendant progressive media
executive. No, this woman’s social-media history reveals her to be the Kwisatz
Haderach of white wokeness, presumably bred through generations of
careful genetic selection to be the supernaturally perfect embodiment of
Affluent White Female Liberalism. (As many have noted, she not only acts
but looks like Titania
McGrath.) It’s vaguely unreal: If there was a trendy progressive take
floating around on Twitter and popular within media circles, then you can
reliably bet she was there to voice it in the most preeningly insulting way possible.
I cannot possibly do justice to the comical depth and
breadth of her posting history. (Matt Taibbi has a fun summary here, framed as a journey through the
American holiday calendar with NPR’s incoming CEO.) This is a woman who loudly
condemns her own “cis white mobility privilege,” and I’m still not sure whether
she’s referring to her ability to quickly change jobs or her ability to roll
out of bed in the morning. Maher is so cringe-inducingly woke that she almost
reads like an intentionally cruel parody of wokeness from beyond the uncanny
valley — as if she were tweeting in the progressive equivalent of blackface,
her endless ultra-orthodoxy an act of desperate, sweaty-palmed minstrelsy. I
prefer an empathetic take myself: Don’t hate the player, hate the game. As a
rich white heterosexual woman from Connecticut in a world of brutally cutthroat
media identity politics, she needs to give a truly committed performance at all
times simply in order to survive.
Do you think Uri Berliner was unaware of any of this? Do
you think he failed to do research on the background of the new CEO before he
gave her a shout-out by name at the end of a piece savaging NPR’s decaying
ethical culture? I don’t. He might as well have wished her luck with a capital
“F.” He had to be aware of what would happen when he shot a giant signal flare
into the air at the end of a piece like this: People like me would notice, and
soon investigators would come a-calling. He basically scripted his own one-act
play: Waiting for Rufo. As it draws to its climax, I am left with
one overwhelming question: Why on earth are American taxpayers footing the bill
for any of this, again?
No comments:
Post a Comment