By Noah Rothman
Tuesday, April 02, 2024
Onetime Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton
displayed all the political skill for which she is famous in a Monday night
appearance on NBC’s The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon. There, she
was asked how Democrats could overcome voters’ dissatisfaction with the two
likeliest presidential nominees, but Clinton summarily rejected the premise.
“What do you say to voters who are upset that those are
the two choices?” Fallon asked. “Get over yourself,” Clinton responded. “Those are the two choices.” She went on
to heap scorn on the muddled thinking that has led millions of Americans to
reject both major party’s nominees. “I don’t understand why this is even a hard
choice,” Clinton remarked. “Really. I don’t understand it.” Indeed, she didn’t
seem to have any interest in or desire to clear up her own confusion. If
Clinton retained an ounce of intellectual curiosity, it was not in evidence in
this segment.
If this tactic seems unlikely to transform potential
Democratic voters into active Democratic voters, it’s probably because that
isn’t the goal. The design is to reinforce the faith in a congregation of true
believers. Reducing something as banal as just one more quadrennial election
cycle into what Clinton called an “existential question” renders debate on the
relevant issues obtuse. After all, she said, Donald Trump and his ilk are
“pretty clear about what kind of country they want.” What’s there to debate?
Indeed, to even countenance the notion that persuasion might be valuable is to
concede the legitimacy of the other side’s arguments. It’s beneath the dignity
of one so august as Hillary Clinton to entertain the solicitations of Americans
who haven’t yet made up their minds.
This performance may be unsurprising from a candidate who
deemed her opponents “deplorables” and was subsequently confused by her torpid standing in the
polls, but Clinton’s distaste for the art of persuasion isn’t unique. Joe
Biden, too, is loath to behave in ways that would confirm to Democratic voters
that he’s interested in expanding his voting base to include the people
Democrats dislike.
The Biden campaign recently produced a 30-second spot allegedly targeting disaffected
Republicans who backed Nikki Haley in the primaries, which is composed
exclusively of comments from Donald Trump disparaging her and her supporters.
The president’s campaign has put a little money behind it, too. One-thirtieth
of the $30 million ad buy has been devoted to the spot, which
will run for three weeks in select battleground states. But the audience for
this advertisement isn’t voters; it’s the political press, which has given the
ad a far broader airing than the one the Biden campaign purchased. The
objective is to create the impression in voters’ minds that the president and
his campaign are making substantive overtures to a broader universe of voters
beyond the Democratic base without actually making any substantive commitments
to those voters.
What other overtures have the Biden campaign made to
disaffected Republicans and GOP-leaning independents? Well, there was that one
statement: “Donald Trump made it clear he doesn’t want Nikki Haley’s
supporters,” read a presidential statement upon Haley’s exit from the
Republican nominating contest. “I want to be clear: There is a place for them
in my campaign.” That’s about it. No policy concessions. No meaningful efforts
to fold non-progressives into either the campaign apparatus or the
administration. No “Sister Souljah” moments to exile from respectable
Democratic politics those who promulgate the fashionable bigotries that enchant
the activist left. Only this, a slightly more elevated version of “get over
yourself.”
Joe Biden might be convinced to do more to court centrist
Republicans and independents in the coming weeks, but it would be foolish to
bet on it. The president seems content to outsource the presidency he won by
rejecting progressive policy prescriptions to the very progressives he
defeated. They’ve been running the show ever since. The slightest deviation
from ever-shifting leftwing orthodoxy so profoundly discomforts this White
House that they cannot maintain a posture of independence for
long. Those Democratic voters, donors, and advocates resent the notion that
their preferences even need to be argued. To submit to being just a part of an
ideologically heterogeneous coalition is an affront — one they need not
tolerate if the arc of history inexorably bends in their direction anyway.
The muscles Democrats once exercised in the effort to
persuade voters to their cause have atrophied to the point of uselessness. All
that remains is the impulse to hector and morally blackmail the holdouts.
Democrats may successfully convince themselves that they don’t need to stoop so
low as to address voters’ concerns about their records, but “get over yourself”
works both ways. If the party in power leans into the idea that persuasion is
beneath them, leaving it to the electorate to assess its own best interests and
vote accordingly, Democrats may not like the verdict the voting public reaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment