By Noah Rothman
Monday,
March 11, 2024
There’s
nothing remarkable about a commercial interest resisting the prospect of
congressional regulation by using its influence to lean on legislators. For all
the populist hostility toward the practice, lobbying is a constitutionally
protected activity for good reason. But the way in which the Chinese-owned
social-media app TikTok went about trying to convince lawmakers to leave it
alone was unique. It sicced its youthful users on Washington in a campaign of
intimidation and emotional blackmail, confirming that the air of menace the app
has cultivated for itself is no accident.
As Jimmy Quinn chronicled, TikTok users resisted a
proposal in Congress that would force TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to
divest its holdings in the user-generated video content company. If it did not,
the bill would compel American app stores to restrict access to TikTok. When
the company mobilized its users to resist that legislation, they did so with
all the vigor of an addict about to be cut off.
Members
of Congress reported receiving threatening calls from incensed TikTok fans,
some of whom threatened to kill themselves if the proposed bill advanced
out of committee. Some promised to mete out violence against sitting members of Congress.
Many sounded as though they were in their preadolescence — indeed, the sound
of school bells could be heard in the background as they sought to
cajole their representatives.
The
campaign was a disaster. It presented tangible evidence to lawmakers not only
that TikTok’s capacity to track the data and locations of their users was quite
robust but also that those users were in the throes of a deep dependency. The
application’s users made the case against TikTok better than its detractors
ever could. That surely contributed to a rare consensus verdict of the House
Energy and Commerce Committee, which sent the bill to the House floor by a
unanimous vote of 50 to 0.
But
it would seem that TikTok only has one mode, and it is not nimble enough to
deviate from the disastrous course on which it has set itself. Even today,
members of Congress are still receiving threats on TikTok’s behalf. “One
lawmaker told Semafor they’d been personally threatened that a ‘yes’ vote could
result in political retaliation: ‘They said that it would be bad for your
future — you will get millions of dollars dropped on your head,’” Semafor’s Kadia Goba reported.
Indeed,
legislators can see the manifestations of this well-funded effort on TikTok’s
behalf all around them. Backed by the Club for Growth, longtime Trump
adviser Kellyanne Conway has been making the rounds on Capitol
Hill attempting to allay fears of the social-media application. Over the
weekend, Donald Trump and his acolytes sang TikTok’s praises
and warned the MAGA movement that the real threat to America’s domestic
freedoms wasn’t the Chinese Communist Party’s Trojan horse but Facebook and its
American owner, Mark Zuckerberg.
It’s
a rare instance in which the far Left has found common cause with the MAGA
Right. Congressman Jamaal Bowman, for example, has long insisted that the
“scapegoating” of TikTok is a species of Luddism. James Goodale, the former
vice chairman of the New York Times, agrees. “A better approach
might be achieved with legislation covering ownership provisions as to
foreign-owned websites which keep the ownership in the hands of Chinese,” he advised.
Democrats
have long warned that curtailing young people’s access to the application would
be seen as a “slap in the face” to young people, threatening the party’s
bottom line with this crucial demographic come November. Yet, the panic induced
by bipartisan legislation that threatens China’s control over the application
has exposed the commercial incentives at the root of this campaign. There
is a lot of money at stake in this venture — an incentive
to which Democrats and Republicans alike are duly sensitive. The starkness of
the choice before them has, however, never been clearer.
If
TikTok survives as a CCP-controlled entity despite the clear evidence of not
just the psychological damage it is doing to the American public but the peril
it presents to American national security, we will know why. It will be the
culmination of this intimidation campaign, in which a well-funded effort to
hold America’s children hostage succeeded. If that is the ultimate outcome, it
won’t be the last time Beijing puts a gun to Washington’s head.
No comments:
Post a Comment