National
Review Online
Wednesday,
November 02, 2022
As new
reports of Iranian collusion with the Russian war machine trickle in, the White
House continues to undermine both the Ukrainian war effort and Iran’s
anti-government protesters through its reluctance to immediately walk away from
the nuclear negotiations with Iran.
The absurdity
of sticking with the talks over an arrangement that would net the Iranian
regime hundreds of billions of dollars should be obvious.
The
regime’s aid to Russia is of a piece with its long campaign of mayhem in the
Middle East and around the world.
Iran has
started shipping unmanned suicide drones to the Russian military by the
hundreds, enabling crippling attacks on the Ukrainian energy grid ahead of
winter. Now, according to a CNN report yesterday, Iran is expected to send
Russian forces precision-guided munitions. Previous reports have indicated that
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps now has a footprint in Crimea.
All the
while, the ayatollah’s security forces have mowed down anti-regime
demonstrators across the country. In one particularly bloody case, snipers let
loose on ethnic Baloch worshippers in the city of Zahedan, a massacre that will
not soon be forgotten.
Rather
than opting for a clean break from the forlorn talks, the administration has
come up with a clever way to hedge its bets. Top officials want you to believe
that Washington has ruled out a return to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action, without in fact repudiating the talks.
“It is
not on our agenda,” Robert Malley, Biden’s chief Iran negotiator and a
proponent of appeasing Tehran, said in an interview with Axios this
week. “We are not going to focus on something which is inert when other things
are happening . . . and we are not going to waste our time on it . . . if Iran
has taken the position it has taken,” he continued. For weeks, top U.S.
officials have offered up some version of that formulation when asked whether
the protest movement or Tehran’s collaboration with Russia should end the
nuclear diplomacy. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said recently that there’s
“no imminent agreement because the Iranians continue to inject extraneous
issues into the discussions,” adding that the administration continues “to
believe that a diplomatic resolution” to Iran’s nuclear program is best.
All of
this suggests that such negotiations might be taken up once again,
when any “diplomatic resolution” along the lines of the JCPOA should be
foreclosed. It’s also a mistake to silo off Iran’s atrocities from any
talks.
With the
sanctions relief that would come from an agreement, Iran will inevitably spend
more on weapons and equipment with which it can assist Putin’s war effort and
tighten its control at home. In the same Axios report, an
unnamed “senior Biden administration official” claimed that even if Iran were
to offer a more conciliatory position on the talks, the administration would be
unlikely to strike up a revived JCPOA at this point, given Ukraine
and the protest movement. We’ll believe that when we hear it from Malley and
Blinken.
The
JCPOA made no sense to begin with, and now is even less defensible. It’s time
for even its most fervent believers to finally let it go.
No comments:
Post a Comment